Vinny Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 21 minutes ago, royalfan said: If we have less to spend, it is very important to spend it on the starting lineup and get creative to fill in the rest of the roster. If we had an extra million say, would you go get a $1 mil player, or swap say three 400k guys for three 700-750k guys? Quote
cornfed24-7 Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 25 minutes ago, Vinny said: If we had an extra million say, would you go get a $1 mil player, or swap say three 400k guys for three 700-750k guys? Easy choice for me. Swap for three 750k guys. Vinny 1 Quote
millerhusker Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 Kansas State has one of the highest paid rosters in the country. Hawkins ($2mil), Onyenso and Achor combined to make $4+ million, according to Shams Charania. McDaniel made $800k. So that’s a $6+ million dollar roster. And they finished below .500. Would be interesting to know what Wisconsin’s NIL budget is for basketball. I would guess AJ Storr and Chucky Hepburn’s combined earnings this year were almost as much as Wisconsin’s entire roster. basketballjones 1 Quote
basketballjones Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 4 hours ago, cornfed24-7 said: I don't disagree with this. But then (1) how many did we win on the road that they had a better record than us or (2) spent more on than we do in NIL? That doesn’t matter. You guys are all insinuating coaching/X’s and O’s just does not matter anymore. Spend the most money = winning. That’s what you’re all saying. Even by all your logic who are so obsessed with NIL/1890/Spending money - we should have, at the very minimum - been in the big 10 tourney. I doubt we’re bottom 3-4 in spending in the conference. Especially if you do any “cost of living” adjustments. I mean, if we are, then F me I guess. But I don’t think we are. millerhusker, The Polish Rifle, cornfed24-7 and 1 other 1 3 Quote
B-town hoopsfan Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 Evaluate better and be more flexible on what we do defensively….NIL be damned….stop redshirting guys that could contribute too cornfed24-7 1 Quote
basketballjones Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 1 hour ago, royalfan said: If we have less to spend, it is very important to spend it on the starting lineup and get creative to fill in the rest of the roster. Maryland would agree, ha. huskerkid21 1 Quote
basketballjones Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 4 minutes ago, B-town hoopsfan said: Evaluate better and be more flexible on what we do defensively….NIL be damned….stop redshirting guys that could contribute too Fwiw, and @hhcmatt has convinced me on this, I highly doubt those guys redshirted because they were told to. In 2025 you gotta imagine they directly chose to. millerhusker, HuskerMB and hhcmatt 1 2 Quote
B-town hoopsfan Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 1 minute ago, basketballjones said: Fwiw, and @hhcmatt has convinced me on this, I highly doubt those guys redshirted because they were told to. In 2025 you gotta imagine they directly chose to. Burn the redshirts halfway through the year then when it was painfully obvious we had no bench to speak of….the chances that 5th year is spent here are so small IMO that redshirting them did nothing for us. roscoe and B1G Red 2 Quote
hhcmatt Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 4 minutes ago, B-town hoopsfan said: Burn the redshirts halfway through the year then when it was painfully obvious we had no bench to speak of….the chances that 5th year is spent here are so small IMO that redshirting them did nothing for us. We had a very deep bench, it's just that the options weren't very good. If they guys redshirting were better options, they wouldn't have redshirted. throwback, thrasher31 and Red Rum 3 Quote
cozrulz Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 21 minutes ago, B-town hoopsfan said: Burn the redshirts halfway through the year then when it was painfully obvious we had no bench to speak of….the chances that 5th year is spent here are so small IMO that redshirting them did nothing for us. It doesn't seem like many freshman across the league are getting very many minutes. So redshirt or maybe get 6 minutes a game? It would be different if we didn't have the guys in front of them. Quote
Faux Mike Peltz Posted March 14 Author Report Posted March 14 I think Janowski would’ve helped us this year. To what extent? Not sure. Quote
Navin R. Johnson Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 2 hours ago, royalfan said: If we have less to spend, it is very important to spend it on the starting lineup and get creative to fill in the rest of the roster. The trouble with that philosophy is that Sam H will run out of eligibility soon! Quote
AuroranHusker Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 33 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said: The trouble with that philosophy is that Sam H will run out of eligibility soon! Justin Bolis has a lot of eligibility remaining, though. Quote
Navin R. Johnson Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said: Justin Bolis has a lot of eligibility remaining, though. I would be happy if Bolis gives us Sam's production. Trouble is he would probably want more NIL money. Quote
AuroranHusker Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said: I would be happy if Bolis gives us Sam's production. Trouble is he would probably want more NIL money. Fred needed a few 6'-4"+ sons. Nebrasketball1979, NUtball and Shawn Eichorst's Toupee 2 1 Quote
Navin R. Johnson Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 7 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said: Fred needed a few 6'-4"+ sons. If I run into him I will randomly ask him to get on that Quote
AuroranHusker Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 4 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said: If I run into him I will randomly ask him to get on that It prolonged Fran McCaffrey's coaching career, why not..... NUtball 1 Quote
cornfed24-7 Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 18 hours ago, basketballjones said: That doesn’t matter. You guys are all insinuating coaching/X’s and O’s just does not matter anymore. Spend the most money = winning. That’s what you’re all saying. Even by all your logic who are so obsessed with NIL/1890/Spending money - we should have, at the very minimum - been in the big 10 tourney. I doubt we’re bottom 3-4 in spending in the conference. Especially if you do any “cost of living” adjustments. I mean, if we are, then F me I guess. But I don’t think we are. Not at all. But I think it's foolish to think we will get a coach with such superior X's and O's capability it negates a 2-3 million dollar short fall in relations to what other teams spend to be competitive to be in the top 25. Does that absolve Hoiberg from his failures? Nope. Do I think if we switch him out with another coach we will get better results? Nope. Not with that desparity in spending. The first thing a potential new coach is going to ask is what is our NIL budget? What quality coach wants to sign here with that kind of shortfall? Now if you frame it as Hoibergs definitely not the guy and I want to buy a Powerballs ticket chance of hitting the jackpot in hiring a coach fine. I mess with the lottery. Quote
Vinny Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 48 minutes ago, cornfed24-7 said: The first thing a potential new coach is going to ask is what is our NIL budget? What quality coach wants to sign here with that kind of shortfall? This is my stance exactly. If we’re so far behind in NIL, we better not fire the guy who took us to the tourney for the first time in a decade last year, and almost got us there again this year. No one would come here as things stand. cornfed24-7 1 Quote
The Polish Rifle Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 4 minutes ago, Vinny said: This is my stance exactly. If we’re so far behind in NIL, we better not fire the guy who took us to the tourney for the first time in a decade last year, and almost got us there again this year. No one would come here as things stand. That’s negotiable. Iowa this year is a perfect example. NIL funds for Fran dried up. Devries and McCollum will demand a level of NIL investment and I’m guessing donors will line up to back it. Fred seems like a good dude but I can’t see him being the “rally the donors” type like Matt Rhule is. B1G Red 1 Quote
Huskerpapa Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 11 minutes ago, The Polish Rifle said: That’s negotiable. Iowa this year is a perfect example. NIL funds for Fran dried up. Devries and McCollum will demand a level of NIL investment and I’m guessing donors will line up to back it. Fred seems like a good dude but I can’t see him being the “rally the donors” type like Matt Rhule is. Hmm. I wouldn't undersell his ability in that realm. Quote
The Polish Rifle Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 8 minutes ago, Huskerpapa said: Hmm. I wouldn't undersell his ability in that realm. I’m sure he is well liked and hits the links with donors from time to time. But Rhule seems like the type that will grind away for an extra dime. There’s also human nature of giving attention to the shiny new toy. Fred’s been here for 6 years, we’ve been bad to okay - hard for me to believe donors are lining up to donate to basketball NIL. Quote
Vinny Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 Am I hearing that Fred might be some sort of energy vampire? Quote
Faux Mike Peltz Posted March 15 Author Report Posted March 15 Loesner brings the energy. Fred’s demeanor is calm and steady, except when it’s not. Just ask the whiteboards Quote
HB Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 hour ago, The Polish Rifle said: I’m sure he is well liked and hits the links with donors from time to time. But Rhule seems like the type that will grind away for an extra dime. There’s also human nature of giving attention to the shiny new toy. Fred’s been here for 6 years, we’ve been bad to okay - hard for me to believe donors are lining up to donate to basketball NIL. We have donors very willing to donate to basketball NIL. The problem there aren't enough of them, and many of them are constantly getting hit up on all fronts--football, facilities, etc. It's "hey , we have an interior lineman from Notre Dame and we need a hundred grand from you (or your business) to get him." Then it's "hey, we have a post defender we can get but we need a hundred grand from you to do it." These relatively few individuals and entities are the "usual suspects", who do pretty darn well and resist donor fatigue pretty staunchly. Fred has the support of these folks. We just need more of them, as there's only so much they can do. hhcmatt and thrasher31 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.