Jump to content

In 20 games against last year's squad, this year's team would win ...  

60 members have voted

  1. 1. In 20 games against last year's squad, this year's team would come away with ...

    • 7 wins or fewer
      2
    • 8 or 9 wins in 20 games
      4
    • 10 wins/10 losses
      4
    • 11 or 12 wins in 20 games
      9
    • 13 or 14 wins in 20 games
      18
    • 15 wins or more
      23


Recommended Posts

Posted
38 minutes ago, Norm Peterson said:

 

Would that affect your answer?

 

Yes because it sounds like this year's team shoots it well in practice but nut up in games.  So I would expect this team to dominate in a scrimmage but a regular game might play out more evenly.

Posted

I’d say this years team is 15 or more. 
 

Hard to compare because the Big Ten is far more difficult this year AND last years team had the luxury of playing in front of a crown at PBA. 
 

Id argue that for teams with less talent the no crowd factor is a major blow. And unfortunately we are going to be the less talented team ever night in the Big Ten this year. 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Handy Johnson said:

The Banton/Mack matchup illustrates how lopsided the Wins could be for this years squad... though Burke is always the wildcard.

Wrong.  Banton is no point guard.  

Edited by HB
Posted
2 minutes ago, uneblinstu said:

If this year's team plays like they did tonight, they might win all 20 going away.

I guess time will tell if we get more than the 2 conference wins we got last year.  

Posted
1 minute ago, thrasher31 said:

I said 13/14, but it could easily be more. The talent difference is noticable in my eyes 

 

talent yes... speed and quickness yes... but certain intangibles certainly go to last years team and that's why I think that it'd be closer than some think.

Posted
Just now, hskr4life said:

 

talent yes... speed and quickness yes... but certain intangibles certainly go to last years team and that's why I think that it'd be closer than some think.

One thing to consider for that, they had a whole trip to overseas to help with that adversity piece and get to know each other. This year has about a month (?). But that's why I also said it COULD be more. That should be a "should be more" but they had that piece figured out. Example, first game of the year was an OT L against some mid major lol

Posted

Dude I totally misread your title and thought you meant if we played MSU lol. As I said in the game thread this team is much better than last years team. This team has a good core like I said you put a couple top 150 guys on this squad who play up to their potential you have a good team. 

 

That's where were at and really it being just year 2 is a good spot.

Posted
26 minutes ago, huskerbill85 said:

Dude I totally misread your title and thought you meant if we played MSU lol. As I said in the game thread this team is much better than last years team. This team has a good core like I said you put a couple top 150 guys on this squad who play up to their potential you have a good team. 

 

That's where were at and really it being just year 2 is a good spot.


Couldn’t disagree more.  We’re not remotely close to being a good team.  Not in a “good spot” at all.  One 5 star Wing isn’t enough to change the trajectory.   

Posted
3 minutes ago, HB said:


Couldn’t disagree more.  We’re not remotely close to being a good team.  Not in a “good spot” at all.  One 5 star Wing isn’t enough to change the trajectory.   

Yep.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...