Bugeaters1 Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 Should the Huskers accept an invite if it were to come. Quote
jayschool Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 If the interim coach wants it, sure. (I kid, I kid. Besides, I just got back from Huskers Illustrated.) Silverbacked1, Bugeaters1, hhcmatt and 1 other 4 Quote
Bugeaters1 Posted February 18, 2017 Author Report Posted February 18, 2017 1 minute ago, jayschool said: If the interim coach wants it, sure. (I kid, I kid. Besides, I just got back from Huskers Illustrated.) So they have coach fired over at Huskers Illustrated? Quote
jayschool Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 Just now, Bugeaters1 said: So they have coach fired over at Huskers Illustrated? Tuco has. And most of the other instant-gratification toddlers. northwillriseagain, hhcmatt and HB 3 Quote
jimmykc Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 I would vote no, but if the team is in good physical and mental shape after the Big 10 tourney and votes to go,then I am alright if they plan to win it. Otherwise it is a losing proposition. Quote
jimmykc Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 Who is Tuco? Salamanca? jayschool 1 Quote
jayschool Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 1 minute ago, jimmykc said: Who is Tuco? Salamanca? Yes. Generally an intelligent poster, but convinced that Miles era has run its course. Quote
Bugeaters1 Posted February 18, 2017 Author Report Posted February 18, 2017 1 minute ago, jimmykc said: I would vote no, but if the team is in good physical and mental shape after the Big 10 tourney and votes to go,then I am alright if they plan to win it. Otherwise it is a losing proposition. It would get the team more practice time. that is always a good right? jayschool 1 Quote
hhcmatt Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 19 minutes ago, jayschool said: Tuco has. And most of the other instant-gratification toddlers. Todd Lichliter is probably available for the right money Quote
Huskerpapa Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 (edited) Playing post-season can be a good stepping stone into next season. That said, my NCAA hopes are still hanging by a thread and my NIT hopes are still a distinct possibility depending on how we play the next three weeks. Edited February 18, 2017 by huskercwg jayschool, Rome4Lyfe and Bugeaters1 3 Quote
Handy Johnson Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 I was going to start a topic on this, but someone beat me to it. I understand the benefits, more practice, games, etc. especially for a young team. YET, what comes with it is an "oh well, it is what it is" mentality that I'm not Ok with. Granted everything "is what it is" so to speak (except Fake News) but the notion of a CBI berth strikes me as a somewhat defeatist attitude. Here's hoping we can string together some wins and sneak into a more substantial post-season tournament. Bugeaters1 1 Quote
Bugeaters1 Posted February 18, 2017 Author Report Posted February 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, Handy Johnson said: I was going to start a topic on this, but someone beat me to it. I understand the benefits, more practice, games, etc. especially for a young team. YET, what comes with it is an "oh well, it is what it is" mentality that I'm not Ok with. Granted everything "is what it is" so to speak (except Fake News) but the notion of a CBI berth strikes me as a somewhat defeatist attitude. Here's hoping we can string together some wins and sneak into a more substantial post-season tournament. Do you think that Miles & co. would take the it is what it is attitude? I don't see Miles as that type of person. So I think that he would have teams attention; with this being Tai's last go it would be something good to build on. HB 1 Quote
HB Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 I vote yes if that is our only option. Quote
HuskerFever Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 Maybe the CBI can try an experiment as well and start calling travels in basketball. BjoeHusker, jayschool, Noah121 and 1 other 4 Quote
PimpMario Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 If we finish poorly (IE 2-4) no. If miles and staff would be more productive focusing on recruiting then do that. Quote
bigred4 Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 2 hours ago, PimpMario said: If we finish poorly (IE 2-4) no. If miles and staff would be more productive focusing on recruiting then do that. If we finish 2-4, then Miles' job will definitely be on the line next year, so I think he would rather have the young guys get as much game and practice time as possible, then he would be worried about recruiting for 2018,19, etc. busticket and Bugeaters1 2 Quote
uneblinstu Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 Meh, I don't know that the practices will be that impactful. It's not like a bowl scenario, they're not gonna get that much practice time. I think anytime you can play in a postseason tournament there's value. It's different than regular season ball. TomEadesSucks 1 Quote
uneblinstu Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 3 hours ago, Handy Johnson said: I was going to start a topic on this, but someone beat me to it. I understand the benefits, more practice, games, etc. especially for a young team. YET, what comes with it is an "oh well, it is what it is" mentality that I'm not Ok with. Granted everything "is what it is" so to speak (except Fake News) but the notion of a CBI berth strikes me as a somewhat defeatist attitude. Here's hoping we can string together some wins and sneak into a more substantial post-season tournament. Of course, everybody's hoping for that. But at some point you have to consider it if it's an option. That's not a defeatist attitude. It's just where they're at right now. Quote
khoock Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 I believe Dana Altman took Oregon to the CBI and won a few years ago and now he has built himself a consistent top 15 team. Could be a good stepping stone for next year. My vote would be yes. But hopefully we can snag something better. jaimes2000 and busticket 2 Quote
REDZONEDAN Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 13 minutes ago, khoock said: I believe Dana Altman took Oregon to the CBI and won a few years ago and now he has built himself a consistent top 15 team. Could be a good stepping stone for next year. My vote would be yes. But hopefully we can snag something better. I believe Oregon played against The Team That Shall Not Be Named for the CBI Championship. Purdue was the 1st Big Ten team to play in the CBI. I'd like to be where any one those teams currently are. I'd vote yes for the CBI if that was our only option. More basketball is a good thing! Bugeaters1, busticket and jaimes2000 3 Quote
HuskerFever Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 25 minutes ago, REDZONEDAN said: I believe Oregon played against The Team That Shall Not Be Named for the CBI Championship. Purdue was the 1st Big Ten team to play in the CBI. I'd like to be where any one those teams currently are. I'd vote yes for the CBI if that was our only option. More basketball is a good thing! ...unless you lose to a Garner-Webb in the CBI. Noah121 1 Quote
throwback Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 I think you leave the choice up to your senior(s). PimpMario 1 Quote
PimpMario Posted February 18, 2017 Report Posted February 18, 2017 I think you leave the choice up to your senior(s).Yeah let Tai decide. He can even coach while the others coaches go recruit Quote
tcp Posted February 19, 2017 Report Posted February 19, 2017 Always good to have one or done experiences of tourney play. If anyone thinks the NIT is a quality land for a team, the CBI logic is just about identical. If your team is really banged up and the rest would be better then continuing on, then I'd say no, but that's generally not the case with too many teams. I'm looking on the bright side. The NIT is still in play. Our RPI is high enough, so it's a matter getting the wins and then some breaks in the conf tourneys in the mids. Quote
Dead Dog Alley Posted February 19, 2017 Report Posted February 19, 2017 If it comes to that, it would probably drop them from the number 1 spot is strength of schedule. But it would be a way to finish over 0.500, I would give pretty good odds of winning it because Morrow and Jacobson could beat the crap out of anybody they'd see in that field. TomEadesSucks 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.