Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

 

What other basketball coach at Nebraska can you think of that imploded everything around them enough where they had to take a leave of absence in the middle of the season? 

They've never won a tournament game we've had plenty of assistants that were turds this is a terrible basketball program 

Posted
3 minutes ago, huskerbill85 said:

They've never won a tournament game we've had plenty of assistants that were turds this is a terrible basketball program 

 

I did not expect a reply that would amount to figuratively dropping a full outhouse onto reunion day

Posted
30 minutes ago, huskerbill85 said:

They've never won a tournament game we've had plenty of assistants that were turds this is a terrible basketball program 

Do you  think Matt A. Did a good job while here?  

Posted
On 2/8/2023 at 8:02 PM, hhcmatt said:

 

I did not expect a reply that would amount to figuratively dropping a full outhouse onto reunion day

I'm just tired of losing man it seems like all of us on here give more of a damn about the basketball program than the ones in charge of it and it's been that way for aloooong time.

Posted
26 minutes ago, huskerbill85 said:

I'm just tired of losing man it seems like all of us on here give more of a damn about the basketball program than the ones in charge of it and it's been that way for aloooong time.


B-ball ain’t the bread winner 

Posted
50 minutes ago, OmahaHusker said:


B-ball ain’t the bread winner 

Yeah but we have alot of potential resources. There isn't 1 thing K-State has that is way better other than history and I doubt many kids today are even aware of it. Nebraska should be making the tournament and winning games here and there every few years.

 

Matt A. No doubt sucked but who hired him? Even Doc 2.0 was a dud here. I think there's just more to it.

Posted
7 hours ago, huskerbill85 said:

I'm just tired of losing man it seems like all of us on here give more of a damn about the basketball program than the ones in charge of it and it's been that way for aloooong time.

 

It just seemed odd that you would make some sort of comment seemingly to marvel at people bagging on ex-coaches when it seems like you're just biding your time to be the first person to drop a mudpie on the next coach we hire.

Posted
8 hours ago, huskerbill85 said:

It's hard to say anyone during the Hoiberg tenure has done a good job.

But it's not impossible.  Consider this, for example:

1. In the 10 games this season when all five starters were available, NU gets 7 wins against 3 losses, including dominant wins over Creighton and Iowa and a final-possession screw-up by the refs in a loss to No. 1 Purdue.
2. Replacing minutes of two gone-for-the-season, highly-proficient defenders with the likes of walk-on Sam Hoiberg is not ideal--but Hoiberg & Co. managed a win over Penn St. nonetheless.

Posted
1 hour ago, Swan88 said:

 

1. In the 10 games this season when all five starters were available, NU gets 7 wins against 3 losses

 

I think this was updated to 6-4, not 7-3.  However, we did look a heck of a lot better.  We still had IU in there though, so there's no guarantee that we would have done a ton.  I do think we could have won another 1-3 games by this point though.

Posted
22 minutes ago, hskr4life said:

I think this was updated to 6-4, not 7-3.

 

That is wrong too.  It's actually 5-5, here are the first ten games after Walker returned:

 

  Jan 3 42 Michigan St. L, 74-56   Away B10   30 81 38 15 7-13 0-0 1-8 2 7 3 3 1 1 1  
 
  Dec 29 32 Iowa W, 66-50   Home B10   21 77 30 10 5-9 0-0 0-0 2 6 0 4 1 1 4  
  Dec 20 213 Queens W, 75-65   Home   MVP 28 145 20 13 6-8 0-0 1-2 1 5 6 1 2 2 2  
  Dec 17 20 Kansas St. L, 71-56   Semi-Away     27 66 25 7 1-5 0-0 5-6 1 5 3 5 2 0 4  
  Dec 10 5 Purdue L, 65-62 OT Home B10   33 109 25 14 7-13 0-0 0-0 6 4 1 2 1 0 4  
  Dec 7 21 Indiana L, 81-65   Away B10   32 90 25 11 5-7 0-0 1-4 1 4 5 5 0 2 1  
  Dec 4 9 Creighton W, 63-53   Away     23 116 41 22 11-16 0-0 0-0 4 4 2 3 0 0 3  
 
  Nov 30 162 Boston College W, 88-67   Home     18 168 14 10 5-6 0-0 0-0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3  
  Nov 27 186 Florida St. W, 75-58   Neutral   MVP 32 164 20 20 10-12 0-0 0-0 6 7 4 1 0 0 1  
  Nov 25 37 Memphis L, 73-61   Neutral     35 78 33 15 7-10 0-1 1-2 6 6 3 9 1 1 2

 

Iowa and Creighton were decent wins, but the other three were pretty non impressive.

Posted
2 minutes ago, 49r said:

 

That is wrong too.  It's actually 5-5, here are the first ten games after Walker returned:

 

  Jan 3 42 Michigan St. L, 74-56   Away B10   30 81 38 15 7-13 0-0 1-8 2 7 3 3 1 1 1  
 
  Dec 29 32 Iowa W, 66-50   Home B10   21 77 30 10 5-9 0-0 0-0 2 6 0 4 1 1 4  
  Dec 20 213 Queens W, 75-65   Home   MVP 28 145 20 13 6-8 0-0 1-2 1 5 6 1 2 2 2  
  Dec 17 20 Kansas St. L, 71-56   Semi-Away     27 66 25 7 1-5 0-0 5-6 1 5 3 5 2 0 4  
  Dec 10 5 Purdue L, 65-62 OT Home B10   33 109 25 14 7-13 0-0 0-0 6 4 1 2 1 0 4  
  Dec 7 21 Indiana L, 81-65   Away B10   32 90 25 11 5-7 0-0 1-4 1 4 5 5 0 2 1  
  Dec 4 9 Creighton W, 63-53   Away     23 116 41 22 11-16 0-0 0-0 4 4 2 3 0 0 3  
 
  Nov 30 162 Boston College W, 88-67   Home     18 168 14 10 5-6 0-0 0-0 1 4 0 0 0 0 3  
  Nov 27 186 Florida St. W, 75-58   Neutral   MVP 32 164 20 20 10-12 0-0 0-0 6 7 4 1 0 0 1  
  Nov 25 37 Memphis L, 73-61   Neutral     35 78 33 15 7-10 0-1 1-2 6 6 3 9 1 1 2

 

Iowa and Creighton were decent wins, but the other three were pretty non impressive.

No it's not. The stat was about the starting 5 of Griesel, Walker, Gary, Manny and CJ, I believe, but really it's about the first four. Griesel didn't play vs. Indiana but did vs. Minnesota. Then Gary got hurt the next game vs. Illinois, so 6-4 is the stat.

Posted
13 hours ago, hhcmatt said:

 

It just seemed odd that you would make some sort of comment seemingly to marvel at people bagging on ex-coaches when it seems like you're just biding your time to be the first person to drop a mudpie on the next coach we hire.

I'm old enough to remember when you defended Eichorst 

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...