Jump to content

VC - Transfer G Anton Gill (Louisville)

hhcmatt

By hhcmatt
in Husker Hoops Recruiting

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Silverbacked1
Silverbacked1

No that is Colorado, you know Iowa sucks and Colorado blows is why Nebraska is so windy.

hhcmatt
hhcmatt

If we can get a guy on campus and sell him the Terran Petteway and hopefully soon to be Andrew White road to excellence, we have a better than average chance.

dochay
dochay

Gill and fellow Louisville Freshman Terry Rozier?   Gill and Rozier?   

unl

unl

Posted
Posted

I admittedly haven't seen all the prospects out there - transfer or otherwise - but this guy has got to be at the top of the list. I think he could be the next TP. "Oh, look, that guy has mediocre stats until he went to Nebraska".

49r

49r

Posted
Posted

 

 

Gill and fellow Louisville Freshman Terry Rozier?   Gill and Rozier?   

 

Rozier is leaving school for the NBA Draft.

 

 

Do they by chance have a Fryar, Craig, or Rathman transferring?

 

 

Hell, I'd take a Blakeman or Joseph at this point...anything.

colhusker

colhusker

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

Gill and fellow Louisville Freshman Terry Rozier?   Gill and Rozier?   

 

Rozier is leaving school for the NBA Draft.

 

 

Do they by chance have a Fryar, Craig, or Rathman transferring?

 

 

Hell, I'd take a Blakeman or Joseph at this point...anything.

 

Now that's just crazy talk!  :)

King James

King James

Posted
Posted

I admittedly haven't seen all the prospects out there - transfer or otherwise - but this guy has got to be at the top of the list.

I don't know  --- I would think big guys would have to be higher on the list than this guy considering the need.

 

Honestly, with the two scholarships left, I think it would be best to bring in two big guys rather than another guard.

colhusker

colhusker

Posted
Posted

 

I admittedly haven't seen all the prospects out there - transfer or otherwise - but this guy has got to be at the top of the list.

I don't know  --- I would think big guys would have to be higher on the list than this guy considering the need.

 

Honestly, with the two scholarships left, I think it would be best to bring in two big guys rather than another guard.

 

At this point in the game, IF we can only get one serviceable big and this kid can shoot well, bring him in.  After watching our shooting woes last year and really to some extent the year before, I would rather get another shooter than a big that will come in and just sit or transfer back out due not being what we need.

Norm Peterson

Norm Peterson

Posted
Posted

I think if we bring in a kid who has to sit out a year, a top-shelf shooting guard is just fine.

 

We need to find a big who's available immediately, but the other vacancy can go to the best available player at any position, particularly if he has to sit out.

 

I mean, think about it:  We have Hammond, Jacobson, Morrow and the other transfer spot.  Let's say it's the Brazilian kid.  How many more bigs would we really have room for?

 

If our options for big men transfers are limited to guys who are just "OK" but we have a chance to land an elite SG for a year from now, I'd spend one of the spots on the SG.

hhcmatt

hhcmatt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

I admittedly haven't seen all the prospects out there - transfer or otherwise - but this guy has got to be at the top of the list.

I don't know  --- I would think big guys would have to be higher on the list than this guy considering the need.

 

Honestly, with the two scholarships left, I think it would be best to bring in two big guys rather than another guard.

 

 

I get that we want to be successful in 2015-16 but right now don't have a roster full of guys like Gill or White...guys that wouldn't come here out of college because we're not high enough on the power conference food chain. Thus, it's in our best interest to grab a guy like that over a role player that will help us immediately because it's all part of building a program. We built our success on TP and it's very probable that we will build on AW3 this year. Do we miss out on the next building block for a probable non-difference maker from the big man waiver wire? I hope not.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...