Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

a few more of these and we're going to have to start wondering about our actual talent level. 

 

for now, gotta just hang in to see if they get better and gel better and hope it's not a talent issue. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, hhcscott said:

Just an awful performance. No sugar coating it. Schedule will not get easier.

 

It will take a miracle to get anywhere near double digit wins this year.  we're not eating the cupcakes. they're eating us. 

Posted
1 minute ago, hhcscott said:

Just an awful performance. No sugar coating it. Schedule will not get easier.

I got Southern, North Dakota, TAM-CC, and 1 of 2 against Northwestern. Those are my expected wins. I did not expect to win today. Still disappointed, of course. We improved our FG shooting from horrible to awful, though, so we're headed in the right direction.

Posted

I had a very interesting discussion after the first game with another fan. He told me he is concerned Hoiberg might turn out to be like Chip Kelly. One of the reasons Hoiberg (Iowa St bball) and Chip (Oregon fball) were so good bc they had barrier breaking, innovative offensive schemes. Both left for the pros in their respective sports and when they returned to college almost everyone is doing what they were doing. Not so innovative and cutting edge anymore.

 

This isnt necessarily my opinion but I thought it was an interesting take, albeit WAY too early in Hoibergs tenure, and worth sharing.

 

Posted
Just now, OmahaHusker said:

Cam Mack is overrated needs to stop celebrating after every basket. It’s getting very annoying. 

With Nebraska buckets about as rare as goals in soccer the celebrations have to be outsized. Maybe we can get Kent to say Field Goooooooooooooooool after each one.

Posted
1 minute ago, khoock said:

I had a very interesting discussion after the first game with another fan. He told me he is concerned Hoiberg might turn out to be like Chip Kelly. One of the reasons Hoiberg (Iowa St bball) and Chip (Oregon fball) were so good bc they had barrier breaking, innovative offensive schemes. Both left for the pros in their respective sports and when they returned to college almost everyone is doing what they were doing. Not so innovative and cutting edge anymore.

 

This isnt necessarily my opinion but I thought it was an interesting take, albeit WAY too early in Hoibergs tenure, and worth sharing.

 

 

We haven’t even seen if this space and pace scheme is going to work in the Big Ten yet. Based on what I’ve seen I’m going with a hard no. 

Posted
Just now, OmahaHusker said:

 

We haven’t even seen if this space and pace scheme is going to work in the Big Ten yet. Based on what I’ve seen I’m going with a hard no. 

I agree. I think Hoiberg will be very successful here.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...