Emmanuel Bandoumel is N

[Huskerpapa]

Nebraska lands their first 2023 commit in 6'0" PG Chase Clemmons from Atlanta, Georgia. The Huskers had an early in on Clemmons who is the cousin of Trey and Bryce McGowens. 

 

View full article

Edited May 18, 2022 by Huskerpapa

[Swan88]

here are some highlights on Facebook:
 

https://fb.watch/d42JGZphvu/

Edited May 18, 2022 by Swan88

[Cazzie22]

Hope it’s a positive addition.  I don’t know enough about him so I should reserve judgement until I see the product on the court.

[aphilso1]

“While his scoring numbers might not jump off the page, Bandoumel was a fan favorite at SMU for his high motor and relentless effort on defense”

https://nebraska.rivals.com/news/husker-hoops-land-smu-transfer-guard-emmanuel-bandoumel
 

I’m noticing a trend. Seems that we are signing lunch pail guys rather than uber talented studs. Interesting. 

[hhcmatt]

i'll circle back on this on Thursday as i'm on vacation. GBR!

[Swan88]

This is his senior season bio at SMU:

 

2021-22 (Senior): Started all 33 games... averaged 10.6 points, 3.8 rebounds and 1.8 assists... hit 35.2% on threes and 82.3% on FTs... 2.1 threes per game (12th AAC)... scored 10+ 19 times and had a double-double... GAME HIGHLIGHTS: Totaled 16 points (4-9 3FG) with 6 rebounds and a season-high tying 4 assists in the AAC quarterfinal win vs Tulsa 3/11... First career double-double with 10 points and a career-high 10 rebounds to go with 2 steals, 2 assists and a block in the win over Cincinnati 3/3... Career-high 23 points, making a career best 6 threes (6-10) with 4 rebounds at ECU 2/12... Had an AAC-career-best 17 points (4-9 3FGs) with 5 rebounds and 4 assists in the win nat Tulane 1/15... Added 13 points (4-6 3FG) with 4 rebounds and an assist in the win at Tulsa 12/29... Career-high 21 points (4-8 3FG) with 6 rebounds, 3 assists and a steal in the win vs ULM 11/28...Team-high 14 points, hitting a career-high tying 4 threes, with 5 rebounds, an assist and a steal at [13/12] Oregon 11/12... SMU SEASON RECORDS: 70 threes made (17th)

[Swan88]

And here are highlights from his Junior season:

 

https://fb.watch/d44hcQY911/

[basketballjones]

@Norm Peterson called this one

 

does this mean Trey is gone? 

Edited May 18, 2022 by basketballjones

[Swan88]

 

[basketballjones]

“However, given that the Huskers have now added both a guard and a forward (Alabama transfer Juwan Gary), it’s now a formality that Trey McGowens and Lat Mayen will inevitably move on from the program.“

 

Damn… when Washut says things like this, it’s basically fact. Cause there’s no reason why he couldn’t have said Tominaga in there, but he didn’t. 

[huskerbill85]

Night and day approach to the profile of guys we are getting. Very interesting  

[Bugeaters1]

49 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

i'll circle back on this on Thursday as i'm on vacation. GBR!

I see what you did there.

 

[Norm Peterson]

1 hour ago, basketballjones said:

@Norm Peterson called this one

 

does this mean Trey is gone? 

 

Lucky guess. Just seemed like Trey wasn't obviously returning so I figured something must be going on. ;)

[Handy Johnson]

Is this the last piece of the puzzle…? 

[REDitus]

Welcome Mr. Bandoumel.   

 

Seems like a well rounded player.   I like the pride he takes in defense. 

 

 

 

[49r]

Bandoumel has started every game for SMU since January 18th, 2020.  So he at least seems to be reliable?

 

 

 

2022 Game Data

			Opponent	Result		Site			St	MP	ORtg	%Ps	Pts	2Pt	3Pt	FT	OR	DR	A	TO	Blk	Stl	PF
	Mar 20	44	Washington St.	L, 75-63		Home			•	34	53	15	4	1-4	0-4	2-2	0	2	2	1	0	0	1
	Mar 16	205	Nicholls St.	W, 68-58		Home			•	30	78	24	8	1-4	1-9	3-3	2	6	4	1	0	1	0
	Mar 12	24	Memphis	L, 70-63		Neutral	Amer-T		•	38	76	14	8	4-5	0-5	0-0	0	2	1	1	0	1	3
	Mar 11	171	Tulsa	W, 83-58		Neutral	Amer-T		•	35	131	19	16	1-4	4-9	2-2	0	6	4	0	0	0	3
	Mar 6	98	Tulane	W, 74-68		Home	Amer		•	37	119	21	18	2-3	4-12	2-2	0	4	3	0	1	1	1
	Mar 3	101	Cincinnati	W, 76-71		Home	Amer		•	37	144	10	10	0-1	2-4	4-4	2	8	2	1	1	2	2
	Feb 27	2	Houston	L, 75-61		Away	Amer		•	37	78	22	9	2-6	1-5	2-2	0	4	4	2	0	0	1
	Feb 23	171	Tulsa	W, 75-61		Home	Amer		•	32	141	15	14	0-0	4-9	2-2	0	4	2	0	0	2	1
	Feb 20	24	Memphis	W, 73-57		Home	Amer		•	31	172	9	9	2-3	1-2	2-2	0	2	2	0	0	2	0
	Feb 16	116	Temple	L, 64-57		Away	Amer		•	35	69	16	6	1-7	1-3	1-2	1	3	2	0	1	0	4
	Feb 12	179	East Carolina	W, 80-66		Away	Amer		•	32	112	28	23	0-5	6-10	5-6	1	3	0	2	0	0	3
	Feb 9	2	Houston	W, 85-83		Home	Amer		•	37	57	9	3	1-1	0-3	1-1	0	3	1	2	0	0	2
	Feb 5	94	Wichita St.	L, 72-57		Away	Amer		•	35	102	18	12	1-2	3-8	1-2	3	1	1	2	0	0	0
	Jan 29	116	Temple	W, 69-61		Home	Amer		•	37	85	19	10	2-5	1-4	3-5	0	5	2	2	1	1	2
	Jan 26	252	South Florida	W, 74-54		Away	Amer		•	29	109	19	12	0-0	4-10	0-1	0	2	2	1	1	0	1
	Jan 20	24	Memphis	W, 70-62		Away	Amer		•	39	114	15	13	2-4	2-6	3-3	1	3	1	1	0	1	0
	Jan 15	98	Tulane	W, 75-66		Away	Amer		•	31	130	23	17	2-3	4-9	1-2	0	5	4	1	0	0	1
	Jan 12	252	South Florida	W, 77-65		Home	Amer		•	13	37	31	2	1-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	1	2	0	1	2
	Jan 6	101	Cincinnati	L, 77-60		Away	Amer		•	36	93	20	13	2-6	3-8	0-0	1	4	1	2	1	0	1
	Jan 2	104	UCF	W, 72-60		Home	Amer		•	34	88	13	6	3-4	0-5	0-0	2	3	1	0	1	0	2
	Dec 29	171	Tulsa	W, 74-69		Away	Amer		•	26	85	31	13	0-4	4-6	1-2	1	3	1	5	0	0	2
	Dec 19	161	New Mexico	W, 90-72		Away			•	12	85	32	6	3-4	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	3	0	0	4
	Dec 8	45	Dayton	W, 77-69		Home			•	26	64	22	5	0-4	1-3	2-2	1	4	1	2	1	1	1
	Dec 4	64	Vanderbilt	W, 84-72		Home			•	33	91	20	11	3-7	1-6	2-2	1	2	1	1	1	2	1
	Dec 1	90	UNLV	W, 83-64		Home			•	29	104	25	13	2-3	3-8	0-0	0	3	4	2	0	0	1
	Nov 28	268	Louisiana Monroe	W, 74-67		Home			•	28	140	29	21	2-5	4-8	5-7	4	2	3	1	0	1	1
	Nov 24	143	Sam Houston St.	W, 75-66		Home			•	22	139	19	13	0-2	3-4	4-4	1	1	0	1	0	0	3
	Nov 22	203	Loyola Marymount	L, 76-70		Neutral			•	19	51	17	3	0-2	1-5	0-0	0	1	0	1	0	1	0
	Nov 21	137	Missouri	L, 80-75	OT	Neutral			•	39	79	13	8	0-2	2-4	2-2	0	2	0	3	0	1	5
	Nov 18	274	Southeastern Louisiana	W, 78-61		Home			•	27	108	16	8	1-1	2-8	0-0	2	4	2	1	0	0	3
	Nov 15	330	Northwestern St.	W, 95-48		Home			•	25	125	22	14	2-5	3-9	1-2	0	4	2	0	0	0	0
	Nov 12	82	Oregon	L, 86-63		Away			•	32	102	23	14	1-6	4-8	0-0	2	3	1	1	0	1	1
	Nov 9	310	McNeese St.	W, 86-62		Home			•	24	232	5	7	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	2	0	0	1	3
			Opponent	Result		Site			St	MP	ORtg	%Ps	Pts	2Pt	3Pt	FT	OR	DR	A	TO	Blk	Stl	PF

 

2021 Game Data

			Opponent	Result		Site			St	MP	ORtg	%Ps	Pts	2Pt	3Pt	FT	OR	DR	A	TO	Blk	Stl	PF
	Mar 18	61	Boise St.	L, 85-84		Neutral	NIT		•	27	129	19	16	2-4	3-4	3-5	0	2	0	1	0	0	4
	Mar 12	116	Cincinnati	L, 74-71		Neutral	Amer-T		•	30	59	19	6	1-3	1-6	1-1	2	4	1	4	1	1	2
	Feb 8	155	East Carolina	W, 71-56		Away	Amer		•	22	78	14	4	2-2	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	2	1	1	3
	Feb 3	121	Tulsa	W, 65-63		Away	Amer		•	25	0	8	0	0-1	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1
	Jan 31	5	Houston	L, 70-48		Away	Amer		•	28	20	20	1	0-4	0-4	1-3	1	2	1	1	0	0	0
	Jan 28	31	Memphis	W, 67-65		Home	Amer		•	33	97	26	15	4-6	1-7	4-5	0	1	2	2	0	1	1
	Jan 26	31	Memphis	L, 76-72		Away	Amer		•	32	120	16	13	1-3	3-5	2-2	0	3	1	2	0	0	0
	Jan 23	100	UCF	W, 78-65		Away	Amer		•	25	165	16	11	1-3	2-2	3-4	2	1	1	0	0	0	4
	Jan 11	143	Temple	W, 79-68		Home	Amer		•	36	141	14	16	2-5	4-6	0-0	1	6	0	1	0	0	4
	Jan 7	116	Cincinnati	L, 76-69		Home	Amer		•	22	138	12	12	3-4	2-3	0-1	0	2	0	0	0	0	2
	Jan 3	5	Houston	L, 74-60		Home	Amer		•	30	37	18	2	1-3	0-6	0-0	0	4	3	2	1	1	2
	Dec 30	143	Temple	W, 79-71		Away	Amer	MVP	•	35	160	14	13	0-1	3-6	4-4	2	3	3	0	0	3	2
	Dec 16	155	East Carolina	W, 70-55		Home	Amer		•	23	91	21	7	0-3	2-3	1-2	0	2	3	2	0	0	2
	Dec 5	87	Dayton	W, 66-64		Away			•	36	116	24	19	5-7	1-5	6-10	1	2	1	1	0	0	3
	Dec 2	341	Houston Baptist	W, 102-75		Home			•	25	111	15	12	3-5	2-4	0-0	0	0	0	2	1	0	2
	Nov 30	344	Texas A&M Corpus Chris	W, 91-54		Home			•	25	147	19	17	3-4	3-6	2-2	1	1	3	1	0	1	0
	Nov 25	180	Sam Houston St.	W, 97-67		Home			•	30	79	25	9	0-2	1-5	6-6	1	3	3	6	1	0	4
			Opponent	Result		Site			St	MP	ORtg	%Ps	Pts	2Pt	3Pt	FT	OR	DR	A	TO	Blk	Stl	PF

 

2020 Game Data

			Opponent	Result		Site			St	MP	ORtg	%Ps	Pts	2Pt	3Pt	FT	OR	DR	A	TO	Blk	Stl	PF
	Mar 7	125	South Florida	L, 61-60		Away	Amer		•	15	41	14	0	0-0	0-3	0-0	1	1	2	1	0	0	1
	Mar 4	117	UCF	L, 61-58		Away	Amer		•	34	94	17	8	3-4	0-4	2-2	1	2	1	1	0	1	2
	Mar 1	39	Wichita St.	L, 66-62		Home	Amer		•	29	110	19	10	3-3	1-4	1-3	1	2	1	1	1	0	1
	Feb 25	59	Memphis	W, 58-53		Home	Amer		•	29	117	9	6	1-1	0-3	4-4	0	5	0	0	0	2	2
	Feb 22	80	Tulsa	L, 79-57		Away	Amer		•	31	60	21	5	2-2	0-6	1-2	2	0	2	3	0	0	4
	Feb 19	185	Tulane	L, 80-72		Away	Amer		•	29	135	18	15	1-1	2-6	7-8	0	2	1	1	0	1	4
	Feb 15	14	Houston	W, 73-72	OT	Home	Amer		•	34	146	7	7	2-2	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	0	1	4
	Feb 12	52	Connecticut	W, 79-75		Home	Amer		•	29	132	22	13	2-5	2-3	3-3	2	4	2	2	0	3	1
	Feb 8	115	Temple	L, 97-90	OT	Away	Amer		•	28	97	13	8	1-2	2-6	0-0	0	1	0	1	0	1	3
	Feb 1	185	Tulane	W, 82-67		Home	Amer		•	16	78	8	2	1-1	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0	0	4
	Jan 28	44	Cincinnati	L, 65-43		Away	Amer		•	18	0	16	0	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	0	0	2
	Jan 25	59	Memphis	W, 74-70		Away	Amer		•	32	105	22	14	2-2	3-8	1-2	1	3	1	3	0	1	2
	Jan 22	217	East Carolina	W, 84-64		Home	Amer		•	22	72	16	5	0-0	1-3	2-2	0	4	0	3	0	1	1
	Jan 18	115	Temple	W, 68-52		Home	Amer		•	20	35	15	0	0-0	0-4	0-0	2	1	2	2	0	1	2
	Jan 15	14	Houston	L, 71-62		Away	Amer			19	63	19	4	1-4	0-2	2-3	0	2	0	0	0	1	1
	Jan 11	217	East Carolina	L, 71-68		Away	Amer			18	121	27	11	0-1	2-6	5-6	0	0	0	0	0	0	2
	Jan 8	117	UCF	W, 81-74		Home	Amer			22	119	18	7	1-1	1-3	2-2	3	1	1	2	0	0	3
	Jan 4	169	Vanderbilt	W, 92-81	OT	Away				28	189	13	10	2-2	1-1	3-3	0	1	6	1	0	3	2
	Jan 1	125	South Florida	W, 82-64		Home	Amer			23	134	20	12	3-3	1-4	3-3	1	2	1	1	0	0	2
	Dec 23	126	Georgia St.	W, 85-76		Home				5	-	-	2	0-0	0-2	2-2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0
	Dec 20	96	Georgia	L, 87-85	2OT	Away				10	60	22	2	1-1	0-3	0-0	0	2	1	1	0	0	1
	Dec 7	67	Georgetown	L, 91-74		Home				24	114	16	8	0-1	2-6	2-4	2	0	1	0	0	1	1
	Dec 3	270	Northwestern St.	W, 77-51		Home				17	131	24	10	0-2	1-1	7-9	2	3	0	1	0	0	1
	Nov 29	184	Abilene Christian	W, 70-51		Home				14	57	15	1	0-1	0-0	1-2	0	4	1	1	0	0	1
	Nov 27	243	Hartford	W, 90-58		Home				19	110	21	7	2-3	0-2	3-6	0	4	2	0	0	0	3
	Nov 23	98	UNLV	W, 72-68		Away				11	98	14	3	0-1	1-2	0-0	0	2	0	0	1	0	4
	Nov 18	294	Evansville	W, 59-57		Away			•	29	31	16	2	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	3	1	3	0	0	2
	Nov 16	281	Jackson St.	W, 80-63		Home			•	32	72	19	8	1-2	2-4	0-0	0	2	3	6	0	0	1
	Nov 12	326	New Orleans	W, 77-64		Home			•	17	69	23	4	2-4	0-3	0-0	0	2	2	1	0	0	2
	Nov 5	285	Jacksonville St.	W, 74-65		Home			•	26	71	20	6	3-6	0-4	0-0	1	4	2	2	0	0	3
			Opponent	Result		Site			St	MP	ORtg	%Ps	Pts	2Pt	3Pt	FT	OR	DR	A	TO	Blk	Stl	PF

Edited May 18, 2022 by 49r

[aphilso1]

He really seems to be as close of an apples-to-apples replacement for Trey as possible.  I think we'll miss Trey's leadership, which is not a knock on Emmanuel; it's hard for anyone to transfer in and immediately take over as a leader.  Emmanuel appears to maybe be a touch quicker/more athletic, and Trey a touch stronger. 

 

But aside from those minor differences, I think the role that they fill is nearly identical.  Both have some explosive finishes at the rim in their highlight reels.  Both are acceptable secondary ball handlers, but probably not someone you want logging lots of minutes at PG.  Both keep the defense honest from behind the 3pt line.  And both clearly build their game on a junkyard dog mentality.  

 

So with all of the transfers still available, Fred decided to fill his last scholarship on a Trey 2.0 rather than a true PG or a lead scorer/offensive focal point.  maybe I'm reading too much into this, but that sure seems like an indication that style of play will be MUCH different this coming year. 

Edited May 18, 2022 by aphilso1

[Silverbacked1]

Just a question but did this kid ever come to see us in person?  No big deal, just asking.

[Huskerpapa]

I will be shocked if DW isn't the primary leader.  Others may jump forward; but to me this is Walker's team.

[49r]

17 minutes ago, Huskerpapa said:

I will be shocked if DW isn't the primary leader.  Others may jump forward; but to me this is Walker's team.

 

IIRC CJ was emerging as the vocal leader of the team last year.  If I had to guess I'd say he may evolve more into that role moving forward.

[Huskerpapa]

2 hours ago, Silverbacked1 said:

Just a question but did this kid ever come to see us in person?  No big deal, just asking.

He could have been here; but it sure wasn't broadcasted.

[huskerbill85]

14 hours ago, aphilso1 said:

He really seems to be as close of an apples-to-apples replacement for Trey as possible.  I think we'll miss Trey's leadership, which is not a knock on Emmanuel; it's hard for anyone to transfer in and immediately take over as a leader.  Emmanuel appears to maybe be a touch quicker/more athletic, and Trey a touch stronger. 

 

But aside from those minor differences, I think the role that they fill is nearly identical.  Both have some explosive finishes at the rim in their highlight reels.  Both are acceptable secondary ball handlers, but probably not someone you want logging lots of minutes at PG.  Both keep the defense honest from behind the 3pt line.  And both clearly build their game on a junkyard dog mentality.  

 

So with all of the transfers still available, Fred decided to fill his last scholarship on a Trey 2.0 rather than a true PG or a lead scorer/offensive focal point.  maybe I'm reading too much into this, but that sure seems like an indication that style of play will be MUCH different this coming year. 

Great get if it plays out that way

[Silverbacked1]

19 hours ago, Huskerpapa said:

I will be shocked if DW isn't the primary leader.  Others may jump forward; but to me this is Walker's team.

Well is almost as old as the coaches so…

[basketballjones]

On 5/18/2022 at 10:16 AM, aphilso1 said:

Emmanuel appears to maybe be a touch quicker/more athletic, and Trey a touch stronger. 

Hmmmmmmmmmm - Trey's one of the more physically impressive, explosive people to play for Nebraska. Not sure if Emmanuel is more athletic. Trey's like an NFL wide receiver playing basketball (also part of his problem, never seemed natural or consistent)

Edited May 19, 2022 by basketballjones

[aphilso1]

40 minutes ago, basketballjones said:

Hmmmmmmmmmm - Trey's one of the more physically impressive, explosive people to play for Nebraska. Not sure if Emmanuel is more athletic. Trey's like an NFL wide receiver playing basketball (also part of his problem, never seemed natural or consistent)

 

Emmanuel definitely looks quicker and more agile on tape.  Athletic is probably too generic of a word...I shouldn't have used it.  I do think the highlight reel dunks for both guys are similarly impressive.