Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, KarlHessEatMy.... said:

These refs that did Indiana and Penn State last night have not slowed down in the Mich St Purdue game. I have never seen so many fouls be called. Mich St will have a cpl three guys foul out by the end of the game. 

 

Last time that MSU-PU faced off, Edey drew 16 fouls. Sheesh!

Posted

Potential 8/9 seed vs 1 seed in the second round....

I watched parts of UConn and Houston play and oh my those 2 teams are really good. I mean really really good. I don't want any part of those 2 teams.

I haven't watched either NCarolina or Tennessee play so maybe others can chime in.

 

We need to win some games and move out of the 8/9 seed. I'm now convinced there is no way we end up as a 10 seed. Right now I think we are a high 9 low 8 seed no matter what we do in the BTT. 2 wins I think would for sure move us to a 7 seed with an outside chance of 1 win moving ups up to a 7 provided we play Illinois in the semi-finals and the game is close. I'm not convinced that winning the BTT would move us any higher than a 7. I think that everybody has their mind made up on us as far as seeding goes.

Posted
31 minutes ago, KarlHessEatMy.... said:

These refs that did Indiana and Penn State last night have not slowed down in the Mich St Purdue game. I have never seen so many fouls be called. Mich St will have a cpl three guys foul out by the end of the game. 


These guys are pure garbage. Why do they work so hard to ruin a good game

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Ron Mexico said:

Potential 8/9 seed vs 1 seed in the second round....

I watched parts of UConn and Houston play and oh my those 2 teams are really good. I mean really really good. I don't want any part of those 2 teams.

I haven't watched either NCarolina or Tennessee play so maybe others can chime in.

 

We need to win some games and move out of the 8/9 seed. I'm now convinced there is no way we end up as a 10 seed. Right now I think we are a high 9 low 8 seed no matter what we do in the BTT. 2 wins I think would for sure move us to a 7 seed with an outside chance of 1 win moving ups up to a 7 provided we play Illinois in the semi-finals and the game is close. I'm not convinced that winning the BTT would move us any higher than a 7. I think that everybody has their mind made up on us as far as seeding goes.

 

I've watched a bunch of UNC and a little of Tenn. I wouldn't be as scared of either of them as comparing than to either UConn or UH, which are both scary good.

 

I agree with your seeding assessment. If NU wants to play in Omaha, it's going to be as a 7-seed. Definitely not as a 10-seed.

 

Edited by AuroranHusker
Posted
4 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said:

 

I've watched a bunch of UNC and a little of Tenn. I wouldn't be as scared of either of them as comparing than to either UConn or UH, which are both scary good.

 

I agree with your seeding assessment. If NU wants to play in Omaha, it's going to be as a 7-seed. Definitely not as a 10-seed.

 


I agree but would be more worried playing UNC. They are very well rounded and play defense. Tenn relies a lot on Knecht because he is incredible but he has an off game here and there and if he is not on they can be had.

 

still really want that 7 seed.

Posted
Just now, Art Vandalay said:


I agree but would be more worried playing UNC. They are very well rounded and play defense. Tenn relies a lot on Knecht because he is incredible but he has an off game here and there and if he is not on they can be had.

 

still really want that 7 seed.

 

I think the UNC hype will get them a 1-seed, not sure they deserve it, that's all I'm saying... they do play D, for certain.


Definitely need that 7-seed if NU were to play in Omaha. Pummel Indiana and eke out a dub vs ILL and I think they're 'N" Omaha!! (*wishful thinking*)

Posted
These refs that did Indiana and Penn State last night have not slowed down in the Mich St Purdue game. I have never seen so many fouls be called. Mich St will have a cpl three guys foul out by the end of the game. 
The problem isn't the fouls they are calling today it's that they haven't called them all year so they think they can get away with it. It's why the big ten underperforms in the tournament.

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, jdw said:

Guy just made the full cort put and he only got $1800

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
 


Equivalent of hitting a bonus game on a $100 slot pull and only winning like $500 bucks.  Looks like a lot, but definitely isn’t worth it for what you put in to get there.  Lol!

Posted
2 hours ago, Art Vandalay said:


I agree but would be more worried playing UNC. They are very well rounded and play defense. Tenn relies a lot on Knecht because he is incredible but he has an off game here and there and if he is not on they can be had.

 

still really want that 7 seed.

I'm probably in the minority of one...but even if we were to get beat...a Nebraska/UNC or a Nebraska/Duke game are two of my dream games.  They are at the top of my, I believe, never-played list. 

Posted
17 hours ago, millerhusker said:

They say it’s hard to beat a team for the third time in the same year. Is there any data to back that up or is that just something people say? 

 

Lucky for us (and I suppose me, if I was going to analyze the data without this), we have an answer from FiveThirtyEight. They collected 20 years of college basketball data.

 

Note: There was a separate study that found the 3rd matchup in NFL games no more or less difficult than the first two.

 

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/it-really-is-harder-to-beat-a-team-the-third-time-in-mens-college-basketball/

 

In the first meeting between any two teams, regardless of whether they played again, the slightly better team won 54.7 percent of the time; when teams that played before met a second time, the better team’s chances went down just slightly, to 54.1 percent.

 

But when two evenly matched teams meet for a third time in the same season, their previous results matter. When the teams split their first two games, the better team won 57.3 percent of the time; when the better team lost the previous two meetings, that team avenged those defeats at a 56.7 percent clip. But when the better team won both previous matchups, the third was a true toss-up — the better teams won only about 49.3 percent of the time.

Posted
 
Lucky for us (and I suppose me, if I was going to analyze the data without this), we have an answer from FiveThirtyEight. They collected 20 years of college basketball data.
 
Note: There was a separate study that found the 3rd matchup in NFL games no more or less difficult than the first two.
 
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/it-really-is-harder-to-beat-a-team-the-third-time-in-mens-college-basketball/
 
In the first meeting between any two teams, regardless of whether they played again, the slightly better team won 54.7 percent of the time; when teams that played before met a second time, the better team’s chances went down just slightly, to 54.1 percent.
 
But when two evenly matched teams meet for a third time in the same season, their previous results matter. When the teams split their first two games, the better team won 57.3 percent of the time; when the better team lost the previous two meetings, that team avenged those defeats at a 56.7 percent clip. But when the better team won both previous matchups, the third was a true toss-up — the better teams won only about 49.3 percent of the time.
How did they determine the better team.

Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk

Posted
5 minutes ago, jdw said:

How did they determine the better team.

 

The short answer is adjusted efficiency metrics from KenPom.com. It's worth noting that in their analysis, this pattern held true no matter what "bin" of KenPom rankings they were looking at (kind of a "top-to-bottom" commonality in this 3-game behavior).

Posted
1 hour ago, Nighthawk said:

I'm probably in the minority of one...but even if we were to get beat...a Nebraska/UNC or a Nebraska/Duke game are two of my dream games.  They are at the top of my, I believe, never-played list. 

 

A whole lot of my Lincoln peeps from the80s would love those matchups, especially Duke (the semi-official team of anyone from Lincoln East/High)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...