Jump to content

2025 Transfer Portal

Nebrasketball1979
 Share

Recommended Posts

nustudent

nustudent

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, GhostOfJoeMcCray said:

 

Fair. Perhaps I was a bit harsh on Worster. Just can't get over 22% shooting from 3. For a point guard. Insane. 

True.  But we knew what we were getting there.  There was no reason to take him and not put shooters or post players around him 

Edited by nustudent
  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HuskerFever
HuskerFever

Nebrasketball Transfer Wishlist:   PG, SG, SF, PF, C   Maybe 2x in each position for some depth.

HuskerFever
HuskerFever

Just need to remember...this last offseason, it wasn't from a lack of trying.   But we're going to have to be pretty serious about it this time around.

hhcmatt
hhcmatt

PG?  

Posted Images

The Polish Rifle

The Polish Rifle

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, NUdiehard said:

 

You need to re-calibrate your numbers.  $6M was "middle of pack" last year.  Starting in the fall of 2025, $6M puts Minnesota and Nebraska at the bottom of the barrel.  The reason is  because the revenue sharing dollars factor in for the first time this fall.  And ALL the teams get this revenue share.  So if a team had a $6M last year, then it increases to $10M this fall, and so forth.  That is why Nebraska's NIL is increasing from $2.3M to $6M. Most of the increase is NOT because of more 1890 style NIL, it is just adding the revenue share from the athletic department.  

$6M was top 25 NIL. Robin said his initial thought that our $2M - $2.5M was middle of the pack but it was slightly under that. Still significantly better than Iowa and Minnesota this past season. 

millerhusker

millerhusker

Posted
Posted (edited)

The coaches have their work cut out for them this offseason, but Rienk Mast is a great centerpiece to build around. He's going to be very underpaid by us next year, relative to what his actual value is. Bigs have the highest price tag right now, especially skilled ones. But he's not going anywhere, as it's been said he's with Fred 100%. Only way Mast won't be at Nebraska next year is if Hoiberg's not here. 

 

The Big Ten coaches essentially voted him the second best big in the league last year, behind the two time national POY (Mast was third team, but the first team was four guards and Edey, and second team was five guards). And he did this on one good leg. Could've shut down his season and had knee surgery in December. But chose to play through it because it was pretty clear we had a chance to be a tourney team and he was an important component (suck one, Devries). 

Transfer shooters and scorers will like his film breakdown. Selfless, excellent vision, great passer. Allows you to play five out with good pace and space. 

Edited by millerhusker
nustudent

nustudent

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Cazzie22 said:

Watching the tournament it appears to me we need an athletic big man either at the 4 or 5.  All the teams seem to have at least one.  And, we need guys who can make shots.

It’s our second biggest need 

hskr4life

hskr4life

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GhostOfJoeMcCray said:

 

Fair. Perhaps I was a bit harsh on Worster. Just can't get over 22% shooting from 3. For a point guard. Insane. 

 

To be fair-- his career average was well below the 30% mark (28ish) so we knew coming in (or should have) that he wasn't going to be a shooter.

The Polish Rifle

The Polish Rifle

Posted
Posted

Here’s a fun exercise:

 

2025 Total Roster Budget: $6M

2025 Roster, Current: $2M

2025 Left to Spend: $4M

 

All-Conf Player: $1.25M-$2M

Starter: $500k-$1.25M

Contributor: $250k-$500k

Project/End of Bench: $0-$250k

 

Might be crazy, but I would spend $3M of our $4M on 2 players at that all conf level - a PG and a wing who can score. 

GhostOfJoeMcCray

GhostOfJoeMcCray

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, hskr4life said:

 

To be fair-- his career average was well below the 30% mark (28ish) so we knew coming in (or should have) that he wasn't going to be a shooter.

 

oh I know. What's the old GIF say..."our expectations for you were low, but holy .... "

thrasher31

thrasher31

Posted
Posted

One I think could work. He played PG to close the year and was MW player of the week. Very efficient as a handler out of pick and rolls. Can knock down a 3. If he can be a PG full time, it gives plus size across the court. Mast would be the initiator on offense in this situation too. 

 

 

 

 

 

hhcmatt

hhcmatt

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Navin R. Johnson said:

 

Without looking at his stats, foul trouble?

 

Not really, looks like they played 10+ guys a game despite not really playing at a fast pace

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...