Jump to content
  • uneblinstu
    uneblinstu

    uneblinstu’s postgame chatter: vol 11, ed 10 - creighton

      #24 Nebraska dominates Creighton 94-75

      Huskers LET IT FLY with 14 Threes

      Crowd dubbed "second loudest only to No Sit Saturday"

      McDermott can dish it but couldn't take it in the post game after a loss

       

      Capture.JPG

    I’m so happy!




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    9 hours ago, Art Vandalay said:

     

    Bo used to do this all the time. He, his assistant coaches, and the recruits were at a lot of games. Riley did not do it nearly as much but once in a while would see some show up.

     

    As much as I hate defending Riley, while he was here we actually had very few Saturday games at home. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The funniest thing I saw at the game was a jay fan, dressed in his jay shirt, sitting two rows in front of us.

    In the first half the Huskers went on a run and there was a timeout. The band started playing There Is No Place Like Nebraska.

    He was clapping along and he continued to clap through the whole song, much to the amusement of my row.

    I guess that is a true jaysker.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Faux Mike Peltz said:

    CU fans are losing their minds. Some are spinning this as a “good” thing, since the CU win in their minds guarantees Miles will be back and get an extension and therefore CU will continue to dominate. Wow. A degree from CU does not necessarily make a smart person. 

    No but it does make you arrogant.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, B-town hoopsfan said:

    Saw that one guy was trying to say we won because we made more shots. That’s also called we played better lol

     

    they got a few vicious guys over there from bashing players like bishop(there best recruit a year ago) to a guy saying coach Mac is an average to below average.

     

    So basically they post the same stuff we do after a loss ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's the thing about this game: we didn't just win, we flat out dominated these guys in a manner that you might expect for a team playing against its 8th easiest remaining opponent.

    I saw some tweets about people being tense about a double digit lead not being enough but to the non-invested viewer you just saw dominance.

     

    DuDwqGWUwAEWzCS.jpg:large

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We might like to bag on the Creighton program but look at the paragraph from Sipple's column on Sunday

    image.png

     

    Maybe this was just a conversation spun to look a certain way for the purpose of the article but I seriously doubt you'd see anyone in their administration ever make a comment like that because they are, if only by default, a basketball school.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

    We might like to bag on the Creighton program but look at the paragraph from Sipple's column on Sunday

    image.png

     

    Maybe this was just a conversation spun to look a certain way for the purpose of the article but I seriously doubt you'd see anyone in their administration ever make a comment like that because they are, if only by default, a basketball school.

     

    If those high-ranking school officials are upset with going 8-2, including a win at Clemson, and being ranked I wonder how upset they're gonna be when Ernie Kent goes 3-7 and PBA is 1/3 full for games?

     

    Sometimes it boggles the mind how stupid people are.

    Edited by 49r

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, 49r said:

    If those high-ranking school officials are upset with going 8-2, including a win at Clemson, and being ranked I wonder how upset they're gonna be when Ernie Kent goes 3-7 and PBA is 1/3 full for games?

     

    Was Moos at this game?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

    We might like to bag on the Creighton program but look at the paragraph from Sipple's column on Sunday

    image.png

     

    Maybe this was just a conversation spun to look a certain way for the purpose of the article but I seriously doubt you'd see anyone in their administration ever make a comment like that because they are, if only by default, a basketball school.

     

    I saw that.  And my thought was "If you're a 'high-ranking school official' and you find yourself in Steve Sipple's company, and there's even a remote chance of an unattributed, off-the-record, negative comment of yours about the basketball program winding up in his weekend column, it would be smart to shut your pie hole."

     

    You hear that?  You know who you are, Mr. high-ranking school official.  Chances are good you read this board, at least from time to time.

     

    Shut your pie hole.

     

    Thanks,

    Norm

     

    P.S.  I'm sure I'll have more suggestions for you as the season progresses.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/8/2018 at 9:58 PM, cjbowbros said:

    According to my English teacher a seven page paper (double spaced) is equivalent to 10 minutes of podcasting. So here you go a seven page essay on Nebraska beating Creighton.  ?

    Look for another more complete episode coming soon!

    Good News and Bad News

    As promised a full episode! Jake and Caleb discuss the last two Nebraska games while the pod opens with a new announcement and a new intro. 

    Does that make this a 25 page essay?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another thought I had about Sipple's "high-ranking school official" comment was who that school official could possibly be.

     

    Is the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences a "high-ranking school official?"  Sure.  But, in this context, Sipple wouldn't have referred to them as such.  In the context of the athletic department, the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences doesn't really qualify as "high-ranking."

     

    The list of those who would qualify for that designation is … very short:

     

    Hank Bounds

    Ronnie Green

    Bill Moos

    Marc Boehm

     

    That's it.  Anyone other than those 4 people doesn't really count as a "high-ranking school official" in the context of talking about an athletic program.

     

    I have a guess as to who that official was, but I can tell you I doubt it was Moos or Boehm.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Norm Peterson said:

    Another thought I had about Sipple's "high-ranking school official" comment was who that school official could possibly be.

     

    Is the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences a "high-ranking school official?"  Sure.  But, in this context, Sipple wouldn't have referred to them as such.  In the context of the athletic department, the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences doesn't really qualify as "high-ranking."

     

    The list of those who would qualify for that designation is … very short:

     

    Hank Bounds

    Ronnie Green

    Bill Moos

    Marc Boehm

     

    That's it.  Anyone other than those 4 people doesn't really count as a "high-ranking school official" in the context of talking about an athletic program.

     

    I have a guess as to who that official was, but I can tell you I doubt it was Moos or Boehm.

    I don't have a lot of influence through the podcast but I will do anything I can to stop this madness.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, hhcmatt said:

    A large part of that big run we had in the first half came with Palmer on the bench.

     

    Yes.  Absolutely correct.  I turned to the guy next to me when Palmer went out and said we need to be able to keep scoring with him on the bench.

     

    Next thing I turnaround and we've extended the lead and now we're up 30-14.  It was beautiful.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, hhcmatt said:

    Here's the thing about this game: we didn't just win, we flat out dominated these guys in a manner that you might expect for a team playing against its 8th easiest remaining opponent.

    I saw some tweets about people being tense about a double digit lead not being enough but to the non-invested viewer you just saw dominance.

     

    DuDwqGWUwAEWzCS.jpg:large

    We did. They literally had no answer for our offense. Every time they got a bucket we would go down and get an easy one. We shot well...but they are a pretty horrible defensive team. 

     

    Creighton....nice skill players. Can shoot the ball. But, they lack athleticism and we were clearly superior in that department. Our guys really wanted it and played that way as well. If we continue to bring that energy at the PBA the only team that may have a chance against us at home is MSU. Keep the home streak alive. 

    Edited by huskerbaseball13

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Norm Peterson said:

    Another thought I had about Sipple's "high-ranking school official" comment was who that school official could possibly be.

     

    Is the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences a "high-ranking school official?"  Sure.  But, in this context, Sipple wouldn't have referred to them as such.  In the context of the athletic department, the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences doesn't really qualify as "high-ranking."

     

    The list of those who would qualify for that designation is … very short:

     

    Hank Bounds

    Ronnie Green

    Bill Moos

    Marc Boehm

     

    That's it.  Anyone other than those 4 people doesn't really count as a "high-ranking school official" in the context of talking about an athletic program.

     

    I have a guess as to who that official was, but I can tell you I doubt it was Moos or Boehm.

     

     

    What about Matt Davison............

     

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sorry if this has already been posted or discussed somewhere but from this morning's article by Chris Basnett, I did not realize this:

     

    Creighton — run and gun, let it fly Creighton — finished with zero fast-break points.

     

    https://journalstar.com/sports/huskers/mens-basketball/nebraska-defense-regains-its-edge-while-slowing-jays-attack/article_784642b6-ed57-54cc-a906-c886f933cb59.html?utm_content=buffer5f911&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=LEEDCC#25

     

    Unbelievable effort. Beat them at their own game. Couldn't be more pleased with how this game went. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, burgundy95 said:

    Sorry if this has already been posted or discussed somewhere but from this morning's article by Chris Basnett, I did not realize this:

     

    Creighton — run and gun, let it fly Creighton — finished with zero fast-break points.

     

    Hasn't been posted yet.

    In the pre-game Miles talked about the Jays usually running some complex offensive sets but this season (i'm assuming the lack of experience) it's transition and hunting for 3s. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...