Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Cazzie22 said:

Tennesse should be seeded higher.  The Vols could win it all.  I question Michigan and am not sure the B1G deserves 9 teams.  

 

Regardless, what happened to the ACC? They haven't had much representation over the last decade (at least from how I've recalled it).

Posted
15 hours ago, hskr4life said:

Cannot believe Rutgers was in with that NET and Oklahoma out.  Ridiculous if you ask me.

 

Rutgers in a play in is ridiculous too considering where they finished vs Michigan.

The Rutgers v Oklahoma comparison is pretty crazy. Rutgers with more high end wins, but Oklahoma has their fair share. Rutgers 9-10 vs Quad 1/2. Oklahoma 10-14 vs Quad 1/2. Rutgers 3 bad loses to Oklahoma's 1. Oklahoma 28 spots higher in the NET. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Polish Rifle said:

The Rutgers v Oklahoma comparison is pretty crazy. Rutgers with more high end wins, but Oklahoma has their fair share. Rutgers 9-10 vs Quad 1/2. Oklahoma 10-14 vs Quad 1/2. Rutgers 3 bad loses to Oklahoma's 1. Oklahoma 28 spots higher in the NET. 


Right!?  For me Resumes were pretty even and the tip of the scale went to the NET which Oklahoma was by far better in.  Is Rutgers the lowest NET to make an at large and by how much?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...