Jump to content
  • AuroranHusker
    AuroranHusker

    Petteway puts up 19 for the Hawks

      CKSe431WwAEFDtI.jpg

       

      His most impressive game to date in the Summer League has TP5 on the inside track for a training camp invite


    ... Petteway put together his best offensive performance in summer league, scoring 19 points on 8-of-11 shooting, including 3-of-6 from 3-point range. The 6-foot-6 guard/forward hit his first eight shots from the field, as the Hawks outscored Dallas, 21-13 in the second quarter to overcome an early deficit.

    Petteway, who is averaging 11.5 points per game in Summer League, also added six rebounds, two assists and a pair of blocked shots in the win...

     

    http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=210225188




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    They say TP will enter the draft as a wing. Why isn't TP being considered for a SG position? Does he lack speed to defend the 2? He's got great height at 6'6 (average is around 6'5 for SG)

    I think you're putting too much emphasis on a label. Unless you know something I'm unaware of and they actually tag these players with a positional name prior to the draft. Guards, forwards, and centers are what players used to be labeled as. Now it's more point guard, shooting guard, small forward, power forward, center. But we hear a lot about there not being any more true centers in the college game. Then there's the numerical labeling system, giving each position a number 1 through 5. 1 is PG, 2 is SG, 3 is SF, 4 is PF, and 5 is C. When i hear "wing" that's either the 2 or the 3. So a shooting guard is a wing and a wing is a shooting guard. Or a wing can be a small forward. Some coaches don't even label positions or just ignore them. I think Coach K is one of those coaches. It's all labeling and doesn't have anything to do with Petteway's quickness or being able to guard a particular position. It's all about matchups on the court and not about players guarding the equivalently labeled player on the other team.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Guard Aaron White?!? GUARD???? Really.... c'mon man!!

     

    Those designations aren't accurate as Rakeem Christmas is definitely not a guard

     

     

    Well, I guess Aaron White's stat line looks more like a PG, 5 pt, 1 reb & 3 ast.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Doesn't it seem like TP could be a Matt Barnes type player?

     

    It's possible, but that means he'd have to shoot as well as Matt Barnes

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Doesn't it seem like TP could be a Matt Barnes type player?

     

    It's possible, but that means he'd have to shoot as well as Matt Barnes

     

     

    Barnes is a 33.8% career 3pt shooter and has never scored over 1000 pts in a season. I'd suspect that TP's scoring might become more efficient when he's not on the ball nor anything more than a secondary scorer.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2465240-nba-combine-2015-results-day-1-measurements-highlights-and-top-prospects?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-19

     

    Petteway has a larger wingspan (3/4" difference) than the 7'1 Kaminsky, despite a 5" height difference

     

    but petteway did poorly on the vertical tests

     

    Petteway is 6'-4 3/4" (w/o shoes)

    Kaminsky is 6'-11 3/4" (w/o shoes)

     

    Petteway wing-span 6'-11 1/4"

    Kaminsky wing-span 6'-11"

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2465240-nba-combine-2015-results-day-1-measurements-highlights-and-top-prospects?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-19

     

    Petteway has a larger wingspan (3/4" difference) than the 7'1 Kaminsky, despite a 5" height difference

     

    but petteway did poorly on the vertical tests

     

    Petteway is 6'-4 3/4" (w/o shoes)

    Kaminsky is 6'-11 3/4" (w/o shoes)

     

    Petteway wing-span 6'-11 1/4"

    Kaminsky wing-span 6'-11"

     

    meant to say 7" difference

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2465240-nba-combine-2015-results-day-1-measurements-highlights-and-top-prospects?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=web-des-art-top-19

     

    Petteway has a larger wingspan (3/4" difference) than the 7'1 Kaminsky, despite a 5" height difference

     

    but petteway did poorly on the vertical tests

     

    Petteway is 6'-4 3/4" (w/o shoes)

    Kaminsky is 6'-11 3/4" (w/o shoes)

     

    Petteway wing-span 6'-11 1/4"

    Kaminsky wing-span 6'-11"

     

    meant to say 7" difference

     

     

    It's a pretty impressive physical difference to have a 7" height differential and yet have a similar wing-span.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Doesn't it seem like TP could be a Matt Barnes type player?

     

    It's possible, but that means he'd have to shoot as well as Matt Barnes

     

     

    Barnes is a 33.8% career 3pt shooter and has never scored over 1000 pts in a season. I'd suspect that TP's scoring might become more efficient when he's not on the ball nor anything more than a secondary scorer.

     

     

    Who has been scoring over a thousand points in a season?!?!

     

     

    Well other than Pete Maravich? :unsure:                        ;)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    Doesn't it seem like TP could be a Matt Barnes type player?

     

    It's possible, but that means he'd have to shoot as well as Matt Barnes

     

     

    Barnes is a 33.8% career 3pt shooter and has never scored over 1000 pts in a season. I'd suspect that TP's scoring might become more efficient when he's not on the ball nor anything more than a secondary scorer.

     

     

    Who has been scoring over a thousand points in a season?!?!

     

     

    Well other than Pete Maravich? :unsure:                        ;)

     

     

    Those are NBA numbers

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A 31 inch vertical is not a poor measurement. Strictly by the numbers it might be "average" for TP's position but there are lots of players in the NBA who have good athleticism but aren't leapers. Demarre Carroll and Jae Crowder immediately come to mind. IIRC Doug had a 36 inch vert, but he'd probably trade the 5 inches for more agility/explosiveness. When you watch TP play you can tell the guy has plenty of athleticism to play in the NBA

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He measured at 25 in the standing vertical...that's shitty for his position.

    Wow, is that accurate? That's really bad. I wonder if that's just something he hasn't worked on (form, how to do a standing vert)? Cause there's been plenty of blocked shots and dunks he's had where he demonstrating NBA athleticism. There were a couple missed dunks he's had where I was blown away he was even gonna try to dunk it, thing most couldn't even attempt to do.

    Edit: after looking at a lot of those standing verts, I guess I wouldn't say TP's was "bad" per say... There's quite a few dudes down there. Pat Connaughton - wow white boy keep flying!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think I've always seen him as more of a 1-foot jumper. 25 is pretty poor though...that is probably even low on a high school team.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He measured at 25 in the standing vertical...that's shitty for his position.

    Wow, is that accurate? That's really bad. I wonder if that's just something he hasn't worked on (form, how to do a standing vert)? Cause there's been plenty of blocked shots and dunks he's had where he demonstrating NBA athleticism. There were a couple missed dunks he's had where I was blown away he was even gonna try to dunk it, thing most couldn't even attempt to do.
    According to the link above, yes.

    Standing vert was 25. The 31 was the one with a couple steps allowed.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In trying to get a little perspective on Petteway's chances for success, I ran across some of the results for the combine that may be helpful.  Here's a link:   http://www.draftexpress.com/article/2015-NBA-Combine-Athletic-Testing-Analysis-4981

     

     

    Trying to pinpoint a player's athleticism based on their combine testing is akin to trying to get a feel for their basketball IQ by watching them play one-on-zero –it simply doesn't make all that much sense. It does help us get a very general idea of where a player is at in terms of physical conditioning and strength, which often speaks to their work ethic, but rarely sheds much light on what it really aims to portray.

    Unlike the NFL combine, all parties involved realize that few people put much stock in these results..........In basketball, where anticipation and coordination play major roles in how players perform on the court, combine numbers will always take a back seat to how a player uses the tools it aims to measure in actual games. 

     

    I think its important to remember that the 50 or so players evaluated are all high-level players, deemed worthy of being 'invited' to the combine.

     

    True, Terran's verticals were not the best, at 31" & 25";  in fact he was among the 5 worst in both tests.   But in the running vertical, three others also measured at 31", and four were lower.  In the standing vertical, four others measured less than 25".

     

    Lee Barfknecht has a good article in todays OWH about the combine, where he mentions that individual team workouts following the combine are even more important in determining who gets picked and who doesn't.

     

     

    'Petteway's NBA auditions could land him a second-round draft spot, ex-husker Strickland says'

     

    Terran Petteway has turned heads at the NBA combine. Now he needs to further boost his stock in team workouts, says Erick Strickland, another ex-Husker who played nine seasons in the NBA and has helped coach Petteway at the combine.

     


     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I highly doubt NBA teams are going to pass on him because he only has a 25 inch standing vert. Especially since they've watched him play and know he has good athletic ability. Hardly anyone besides Gerald Green or Russell Westbrook ever reaches their max vert numbers in a real game-time situation. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i don't think his stock has changed much from the combine. he was a mid-late second round pick at best before the combine, and that's probably where it stands now.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Erick Strickland came away impressed with Terran's game in all facets. And E-Strick should know, since he wasn't drafted but turned into a 9-yr NBA vet by the time it was all said & done.  Terran could turn into a poor man's Trevor Ariza, who just so happened to have a big part in Houston clinching a 7-game series victory over the Clip(ped) team.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i don't think his stock has changed much from the combine. he was a mid-late second round pick at best before the combine, and that's probably where it stands now.

    I agree with this.  His combine performance did little to improve his status although it seems like a lot other guys did improve their status at the combine which could serve to hurt Petteway's draft chances if he was jumped by guys that were below him. 

     

    While getting drafted might help Nebraska recruiting, it is usually better for guys drafted at the end of the second round to not be drafted at all.  That allows them to pick their own location where they may have a better chance of making a roster.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    i don't think his stock has changed much from the combine. he was a mid-late second round pick at best before the combine, and that's probably where it stands now.

    I agree with this.  His combine performance did little to improve his status although it seems like a lot other guys did improve their status at the combine which could serve to hurt Petteway's draft chances if he was jumped by guys that were below him. 

     

    While getting drafted might help Nebraska recruiting, it is usually better for guys drafted at the end of the second round to not be drafted at all.  That allows them to pick their own location where they may have a better chance of making a roster.

     

     

    That is essentially how Erick Strickland made it. He got to select Dallas as his home, and made the best of it. Signed a multi-year deal after his rookie year which also benefited him financially compared to a late-rounder.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...