Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Fastbreaker said:

Where can I find a official accurate list of Nil payments versus all the numbers I see thrown around the message boards. Makes me thinks you don't know what you talking about  

 

Of course, you can't.   And you won't.   Even when the University makes it's own spend in the near future, you won't hear what each individual player is getting.  Not sure if we'll even know how the roughly $22 million is allocated among the programs.   And feel free to be skeptical about what you see thrown around on message boards, because a lot of it is indeed wrong.  But sometimes the info comes from people close to Fred, or the donors, or the NIL leaders, and is pretty accurate.  Hard for the reader to parse out who might be just throwing out inaccurate hearsay, and those who know some stuff.  

Posted
2 hours ago, millerhusker said:

When you factor in Berke's being a two year agreement, is it still over $1M for this year?

 

I believe yes.   Things have been changing  dramatically with NIL over the past couple of years.  Prices escalated substantially.   Last portal season that happened to a large degree in just the few weeks of the portal season.  That is, from the time Gary and Williams signed their deals, to the time Meah and Berke were signed.  Agents were figuring out leverage, and perceived desperation drives up prices.   

Posted

Speaking of Nebraska kids, seems like we could have landed Fidler or Tonje for Meah money. Hopefully we learned the lesson.

 

Also if we can turn Frager or Bolis into viable rotation pieces that's a big value save over free agents 

Posted
34 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

Speaking of Nebraska kids, seems like we could have landed Fidler or Tonje for Meah money. Hopefully we learned the lesson.

 

Also if we can turn Frager or Bolis into viable rotation pieces that's a big value save over free agents 

Moneyball for college basketball. Pay proven pieces, find cheap production. For a team that can’t spend like the Yankees (or Duke) playing big money for guys like Meah isn’t a luxury we have. I know it won’t translate as well to the B1G, but watching conf tournaments this weekend - it was crazy how many all conf guys teams like Drake and UC San Diego have that were plucked from D2 - I’m sure they came fairly cheap too. 

Posted

Here is a naive question.  The media (and others) can compel salary information on coaches, professors, and the like as it is supposedly public information.  Why doesn't the same hold true for the athletes?  Are they not employees 🤔 of the university?  I also assume they are also eligible for various other employee benefits.

Posted
15 hours ago, Cazzie22 said:

Best player I have seen at State Tournament is Nate Kelly, the Junior Point Guard for Scottsbluff.  He not only runs the offense but has had to defend one of Skutt’s 6’9” guys.  

Hope they take a long look at him too. He seems like he’s got what you need to succeed even if he is a tad undersized. 

Posted
4 hours ago, HuskerFever said:

 

This is the byproduct of having no regulations and living in the wild wild west. There's also different laws by state which make it difficult and there's no requirement for transparency. In fact, many schools don't disclose anything under the guise of student privacy, state law, or simply not sharing figures to try to maintain stronger negotiating power.

 

Unless a regulation comes in by the state or federal government or by the student athlete governing bodies, there will never be a clear list of NIL for each player.

We're only a money laundering/ tax evasion/random criminal finacial scheme away from major regulation.  So go ahead and hold your breath because regulations will be here soon.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Huskerpapa said:

Are they not employees 🤔 of the university? 

Nope. And that's a hill Universities will die on. Because once they become employees you have opened Pandoras Box. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Huskerpapa said:

Here is a naive question.  The media (and others) can compel salary information on coaches, professors, and the like as it is supposedly public information.  Why doesn't the same hold true for the athletes?  Are they not employees 🤔 of the university?  I also assume they are also eligible for various other employee benefits.

 

Student athletes at private schools have the ability to unionize, as found by the ruling in favor of Dartmouth College. This doesn't apply to public schools.

Posted
24 minutes ago, cornfed24-7 said:

We're only a money laundering/ tax evasion/random criminal finacial scheme away from major regulation.  So go ahead and hold your breath because regulations will be here soon.

 

If not regulation, certainly there has to be a point where businesses, universities, and individuals find the ROI just isn't there at these levels of spending. You'd imagine, whether regulated or not, that some form of "right-sizing" would occur at some point.

Posted
1 hour ago, Huskerpapa said:

Here is a naive question.  The media (and others) can compel salary information on coaches, professors, and the like as it is supposedly public information.  Why doesn't the same hold true for the athletes?  Are they not employees 🤔 of the university?  I also assume they are also eligible for various other employee benefits.

 

At this point the university isn't paying athletes; 1890 is. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...