Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, royalfan said:

If we have less to spend, it is very important to spend it on the starting lineup and get creative to fill in the rest of the roster.  

If we had an extra million say, would you go get a $1 mil player, or swap say three 400k guys for three 700-750k guys? 

Posted

Kansas State has one of the highest paid rosters in the country. Hawkins ($2mil), Onyenso and Achor combined to make $4+ million, according to Shams Charania. McDaniel made $800k. So that’s a $6+ million dollar roster. And they finished below .500. 
 

Would be interesting to know what Wisconsin’s NIL budget is for basketball. I would guess AJ Storr and Chucky Hepburn’s combined earnings this year were almost as much as Wisconsin’s entire roster. 

Posted
4 hours ago, cornfed24-7 said:

I don't disagree with this. But then (1) how many did we win on the road that they had a better record than us or (2) spent more on than we do in NIL?

That doesn’t matter. 
 

You guys are all insinuating coaching/X’s and O’s just does not matter anymore. Spend the most money = winning. That’s what you’re all saying. 
 

Even by all your logic who are so obsessed with NIL/1890/Spending money - we should have, at the very minimum - been in the big 10 tourney. I doubt we’re bottom 3-4 in spending in the conference. Especially if you do any “cost of living” adjustments. I mean, if we are, then F me I guess. But I don’t think we are. 

Posted
1 minute ago, basketballjones said:

Fwiw, and @hhcmatt has convinced me on this, I highly doubt those guys redshirted because they were told to. In 2025 you gotta imagine they directly chose to. 

Burn the redshirts halfway through the year then when it was painfully obvious we had no bench to speak of….the chances that 5th year is spent here are so small IMO that redshirting them did nothing for us. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, B-town hoopsfan said:

Burn the redshirts halfway through the year then when it was painfully obvious we had no bench to speak of….the chances that 5th year is spent here are so small IMO that redshirting them did nothing for us. 

 

We had a very deep bench, it's just that the options weren't very good.  If they guys redshirting were better options, they wouldn't have redshirted.

Posted
21 minutes ago, B-town hoopsfan said:

Burn the redshirts halfway through the year then when it was painfully obvious we had no bench to speak of….the chances that 5th year is spent here are so small IMO that redshirting them did nothing for us. 

 

It doesn't seem like many freshman across the league are getting very many minutes.  So redshirt or maybe get 6 minutes a game?  It would be different if we didn't have the guys in front of them.

Posted
2 hours ago, royalfan said:

If we have less to spend, it is very important to spend it on the starting lineup and get creative to fill in the rest of the roster.  

 

The trouble with that philosophy is that Sam H will run out of eligibility soon!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...