McDermott

[nustudent]

Other threads whose topic was primarily Creghton-centric have been moved to the College Basketball folder...ones who discuss topics at least as relevant to how it affects NU basketball (and the state of basketball in the...state...overall).

 

dimes has a pretty low tolerance level for topics of discussion straying from the Huskers in the Dungeon.  He stated that during the offseason he would loosen the reins a bit on that, but in general, I would refrain from starting threads that deal with Creighton hoops in the Dungeon personally.  But that's just me...

Struggling to see what the difference is between me posting a thread about McDermott staying and you starting one about Burke and Hardaway leaving.   Seems to be quite the double standard.  

 

I didn't start the thread because it dealt with Creighton hoops.  I started it because it has an impact on NU hoops.  That game just got tougher for us next year.

[nustudent]

 

 

I am bitching about what form it should be on.

 

And now I realize what an ass I am for even saying anything.

 

Message board bs answer gets old here.  It is the same thing I just said to you. 

 

It is my opinion that it should be on the other team form but.. hey it's a message board so I guess I can't have an opinon that is different.

HUH?

Never said you couldn't.   I don't care where you think it belongs.   That's your call not mine. 

 

But YOU ASKED why it was relevant to us.  So don't get bent out of shape when I answer.

 

I put it here because it's my opinion that it's very relevant to us.  We play them.  It's a part of our non-con schedule.  It just turned a game that would have looked very good for us, into a game that will be difficult.  We play against him and as such....it's relevant to us.

 

Also trying to figure out why you responded in the thread about Burke and Hardaway going pro and didn't seem to have a problem with that one being on this board and not the other?  Why the double standard?

 

That is creepy that you went back to something that I wrote what a couple of weeks ago? To try to make me look stupid. 

 

Because I don't even remember what I wrote at the beginning of this thread.

 

But to each his own.

 

Dude I don't need any help making myself look stupid. 

 

But as I said if we keep this up we can fill 10 pages and We will both look kind of foolish so I'm done you win, talk about it here all you want.

 

It's on the second page and was on the front page just a week or two ago.   It's not like I searched through the archive for it.

 

Again...quite the double standard that one is acceptable and one isn't and they say the same thing.

[hhcmatt]

 

Other threads whose topic was primarily Creghton-centric have been moved to the College Basketball folder...ones who discuss topics at least as relevant to how it affects NU basketball (and the state of basketball in the...state...overall).

 

dimes has a pretty low tolerance level for topics of discussion straying from the Huskers in the Dungeon.  He stated that during the offseason he would loosen the reins a bit on that, but in general, I would refrain from starting threads that deal with Creighton hoops in the Dungeon personally.  But that's just me...

Struggling to see what the difference is between me posting a thread about McDermott staying and you starting one about Burke and Hardaway leaving.   Seems to be quite the double standard.  

 

I didn't start the thread because it dealt with Creighton hoops.  I started it because it has an impact on NU hoops.  That game just got tougher for us next year.

 

 

Also a very good point

[Milk]

Gonna be very tough to beat them in Omaha.  Yes they lose a couple valuable pieces but with Doug back, along with Wragge, and Artino who improved greatly at end of year they will be a solid team again. 

[49r]

 

Other threads whose topic was primarily Creghton-centric have been moved to the College Basketball folder...ones who discuss topics at least as relevant to how it affects NU basketball (and the state of basketball in the...state...overall).

 

dimes has a pretty low tolerance level for topics of discussion straying from the Huskers in the Dungeon.  He stated that during the offseason he would loosen the reins a bit on that, but in general, I would refrain from starting threads that deal with Creighton hoops in the Dungeon personally.  But that's just me...

Struggling to see what the difference is between me posting a thread about McDermott staying and you starting one about Burke and Hardaway leaving.   Seems to be quite the double standard.  

 

I didn't start the thread because it dealt with Creighton hoops.  I started it because it has an impact on NU hoops.  That game just got tougher for us next year.

 

 

That thread was started after the season ended.  And as I said above, dimes has loosened the reins on what is typically a pretty hard and fast rule during the offseason in an attempt to keep the Dungeon from getting stale.  Remember, I wasn't arguing that this thread doesn't belong here, nor do I think it needs to be moved.  I was just saying that if it were me personally, I might stay away from starting topics of discussion regarding Creighton in this folder.  Not passing any kind of judgement.  You're free to do what you want.

[Silverbacked1]

Yeah my first 2 negatives.

 

That's more than cip and Norm, isn't it.?

 

Okay I was only saying that I thought it should be in the other college thread here.

 

Sorry That I have double standards, I was just trying to back 49r and that we now have/had 2 on the same thing.

 

Sorry to make everybody"s day so bad.

 

And Cookie I thought we were cool Man.

[jamar1700]

For the record, I do not care.  They all go eventually.

[49r]

Yikes...sorry I said anything.  My reference was more towards the fact that the topic was previously started on the College Basketball forum.  Une fois de plus, je suis tellement désolé pour ce désagrément.

 

Yeah, what he said.

 

And for the record, the thread cwg started is more than 3 hours older than this one.  Just, for what it's worth.  Can we get a thread merge?

[cipsucks]

 

Other threads whose topic was primarily Creghton-centric have been moved to the College Basketball folder...ones who discuss topics at least as relevant to how it affects NU basketball (and the state of basketball in the...state...overall).

 

dimes has a pretty low tolerance level for topics of discussion straying from the Huskers in the Dungeon.  He stated that during the offseason he would loosen the reins a bit on that, but in general, I would refrain from starting threads that deal with Creighton hoops in the Dungeon personally.  But that's just me...

Struggling to see what the difference is between me posting a thread about McDermott staying and you starting one about Burke and Hardaway leaving.   Seems to be quite the double standard.  

 

I didn't start the thread because it dealt with Creighton hoops.  I started it because it has an impact on NU hoops.  That game just got tougher for us next year.

 

I fail to see the impact on NU hoops.  If the Huskers beat Creighton without McDermott, or lose to them with him, the effect on our RPI will be minimal at best.  It's a road game.

 

I don't care where threads are placed.  God knows I've had my share of off topic threads.  If a thread pisses you off, don't comment on it. 

 

On the other hand, if you want to start a thread about Creighton, expect some backlash. 

[colhusker]

Yeah my first 2 negatives.

 

That's more than cip and Norm, isn't it.?

 

Okay I was only saying that I thought it should be in the other college thread here.

 

Sorry That I have double standards, I was just trying to back 49r and that we now have/had 2 on the same thing.

 

Sorry to make everybody"s day so bad.

 

And Cookie I thought we were cool Man.

Hey it didn't affect the price of my beer, tis ok

[nustudent]

 

 

Other threads whose topic was primarily Creghton-centric have been moved to the College Basketball folder...ones who discuss topics at least as relevant to how it affects NU basketball (and the state of basketball in the...state...overall).

 

dimes has a pretty low tolerance level for topics of discussion straying from the Huskers in the Dungeon.  He stated that during the offseason he would loosen the reins a bit on that, but in general, I would refrain from starting threads that deal with Creighton hoops in the Dungeon personally.  But that's just me...

Struggling to see what the difference is between me posting a thread about McDermott staying and you starting one about Burke and Hardaway leaving.   Seems to be quite the double standard.  

 

I didn't start the thread because it dealt with Creighton hoops.  I started it because it has an impact on NU hoops.  That game just got tougher for us next year.

 

I fail to see the impact on NU hoops.  If the Huskers beat Creighton without McDermott, or lose to them with him, the effect on our RPI will be minimal at best.  It's a road game.

 

I don't care where threads are placed.  God knows I've had my share of off topic threads.  If a thread pisses you off, don't comment on it. 

 

On the other hand, if you want to start a thread about Creighton, expect some backlash. 

 

I guess I struggle to see how one couldn't see the impact.  This takes a team we play and makes them considerably better than what they would have been otherwise.  And I'm struggling with the notion that there is just a minimal impact on winning vs. losing.   There's a lot more at play than an RPI rating.

[nustudent]

 

 

Other threads whose topic was primarily Creghton-centric have been moved to the College Basketball folder...ones who discuss topics at least as relevant to how it affects NU basketball (and the state of basketball in the...state...overall).

 

dimes has a pretty low tolerance level for topics of discussion straying from the Huskers in the Dungeon.  He stated that during the offseason he would loosen the reins a bit on that, but in general, I would refrain from starting threads that deal with Creighton hoops in the Dungeon personally.  But that's just me...

Struggling to see what the difference is between me posting a thread about McDermott staying and you starting one about Burke and Hardaway leaving.   Seems to be quite the double standard.  

 

I didn't start the thread because it dealt with Creighton hoops.  I started it because it has an impact on NU hoops.  That game just got tougher for us next year.

 

 

That thread was started after the season ended.  And as I said above, dimes has loosened the reins on what is typically a pretty hard and fast rule during the offseason in an attempt to keep the Dungeon from getting stale.  Remember, I wasn't arguing that this thread doesn't belong here, nor do I think it needs to be moved.  I was just saying that if it were me personally, I might stay away from starting topics of discussion regarding Creighton in this folder.  Not passing any kind of judgement.  You're free to do what you want.

 

Was this thread not started after the season ended?  I guess I figured it'd be obvious what the intent of the thread was.   I didn't realize I had a long history of starting threads pertaining to Creighton.  

[tcp]

best thread ever. 2 pages on whether or not the thread should even exist in its current locale. We're getting like the Sartre discussion boards. And when that happens, it's probably a good time to binge on hookers and blow.

[Chuck Taylor]

best thread ever. 2 pages on whether or not the thread should even exist in its current locale. We're getting like the Sartre discussion boards. And when that happens, it's probably a good time to binge on hookers and blow.

I post, therefore I am.

 

Wait, that's Descartes, not Sartre. Sorry about that.

[Silverbacked1]

Can we do the blow off the hookers body parts?

 

Then I'm in, Although I have never done either blow or hookers, but what the heck.

[Red Rum]

Yikes...sorry I said anything.  My reference was more towards the fact that the topic was previously started on the College Basketball forum.  Une fois de plus, je suis tellement désolé pour ce désagrément.

 

 

.

[49r]

 

Yikes...sorry I said anything.  My reference was more towards the fact that the topic was previously started on the College Basketball forum.  Une fois de plus, je suis tellement désolé pour ce désagrément.

 

 

.

 

 

 

HAAAHAHAHAHA!

 

Joke's on you...everybody knows that's Italian.  

 

[tcp]

Can we do the blow off the hookers body parts?

 

Then I'm in, Although I have never done either blow or hookers, but what the heck.

 

sadly, you should do these things during a stage in life where the the divorce repercussions are minimal. in short, before 30.

[Ron Mexico]

The best thing about this thread is that it has gone on  for 3 pages with little talk about the topic

[atskooc]

The best thing about this thread is that it has gone on  for 3 pages with little talk about the topic

It's being discussed in the College Basketball forum.

[Ron Mexico]

 

The best thing about this thread is that it has gone on  for 3 pages with little talk about the topic

It's being discussed in the College Basketball forum.

 

Which is why I said THIS thread 

[atskooc]

 

 

The best thing about this thread is that it has gone on  for 3 pages with little talk about the topic

It's being discussed in the College Basketball forum.

 

Which is why I said THIS thread 

 

Yeah, I know!  I should have thrown a smiley in there!

[hhcmatt]

 

The best thing about this thread is that it has gone on  for 3 pages with little talk about the topic

It's being discussed in the College Basketball forum.

 

 

This thread happens to have the superior subject line to compliment it's inferior content.

[Handy Johnson]

I'm THRILLED and NOT surprised he's coming back. Gives the Big Red one more chance to send him out a loser.

[atskooc]

 

 

The best thing about this thread is that it has gone on  for 3 pages with little talk about the topic

It's being discussed in the College Basketball forum.

 

 

This thread happens to have the superior subject line to compliment it's inferior content.

 

To that, I have no objection.