Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, hskr4life said:


It’s a circle of no energy too. Crowd not much to cheer about with our play and our crowd isn’t giving a whole lot of energy for the players to get pumped either.

 

seems like the Michigan game is the only one the crowd has been into.  hopefully can put together a big 2nd half run.

Edited by cozrulz
Posted
7 minutes ago, cozrulz said:

fouling why?  that's where it got you.  our end of halves and games has just been bad.

 

To limit their time to take a shot. I'm theory could have waited longer on that first one

Posted
Just now, hhcmatt said:

 

To limit their time to take a shot. I'm theory could have waited longer on that first one

 

no i know, but they were pretty content to dribble it up top.  i feel like i would rather be running out of bounds plays.

Posted
Just now, cozrulz said:

 

no such thing in college basketball.

They called one on Brice earlier in the year.  I think they called it an intentional foul, but the same concept.

Posted
2 minutes ago, brfrad said:

A rules expert needed.  How come on Worseter's steal, a clear path foul wasn't called?

TBF, he at least made a half attempt play on the ball it looked like in real time.

Posted
6 minutes ago, cozrulz said:

Hoiberg has to stop shooting these threes if he isn't going to make them.

I could say the same for Essegian.  On a day we need him, he’s not there.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...