Bracketology

[Bugeaters1]

A #3 seed won't happen, A #5 could happen but probably a 6 seed. And it would be nice to get shipped to Ames as I would think fans would make that trip over Ames.

[twister31]

Be careful what you wish for. I could see us being sent to Ames in a certain situation but it would probably most definitely mean playing ISU in the 1st round, on their home court.

[Bugeaters1]

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

Will Nebraska get moved out of the Lincoln region ? If The Huskers get a #4 seed the way you have them projected that puts them in Seattle, But then does Cal get moved to 5 or do they get a #3.

[Bugeaters1]

Be careful what you wish for. I could see us being sent to Ames in a certain situation but it would probably most definitely mean playing ISU in the 1st round, on their home court.

That would be all bad, The Huskers would have a good scout on them. And this years ISU team isn't like the ISU teams of past.

[twister31]

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

Will Nebraska get moved out of the Lincoln region ? If The Huskers get a #4 seed the way you have them projected that puts them in Seattle, But then does Cal get moved to 5 or do they get a #3.

 

This is the joy of it! They will not move us out of the Lincoln regional.  Technically, Creme had us at a 5 seed but moved us down to a 6 seed for "procedural" reasons. This was before the Penn State game.  And if we beat Purdue, I think we get a 5 seed with an outside shot of a 4 seed. In Creme's bracket, Cal is already in Seattle so I don't see a problem with keeping them as a 4 seed and moving us to a 5 seed in that sub-regional. Plus with ISU's upset of OSU it would make sense to move OSU to a 6 seed and send them to College station and then have Syracuse who was originally in the Seattle sub-regional to Purdue. It's obviously closer and we all know how the NCAA likes to save money. Makes sense to me. Am I missing anything? What do you think Row6?

[Bugeaters1]

 

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

Will Nebraska get moved out of the Lincoln region ? If The Huskers get a #4 seed the way you have them projected that puts them in Seattle, But then does Cal get moved to 5 or do they get a #3.

 

This is the joy of it! They will not move us out of the Lincoln regional.  Technically, Creme had us at a 5 seed but moved us down to a 6 seed for "procedural" reasons. This was before the Penn State game.  And if we beat Purdue, I think we get a 5 seed with an outside shot of a 4 seed. In Creme's bracket, Cal is already in Seattle so I don't see a problem with keeping them as a 4 seed and moving us to a 5 seed in that sub-regional. Plus with ISU's upset of OSU it would make sense to move OSU to a 6 seed and send them to College station and then have Syracuse who was originally in the Seattle sub-regional to Purdue. It's obviously closer and we all know how the NCAA likes to save money. Makes sense to me. Am I missing anything? What do you think Row6?

 

You mention OSU I haven't watched many of their games caught glimpses of them here and there, I see that they are on a bit of down slide losing 5 of their last 9. Or 4 of the 7 in February when the tourney seeds are made. So do you see them sliding farther then they have ?

[cyinne]

 

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

Will Nebraska get moved out of the Lincoln region ? If The Huskers get a #4 seed the way you have them projected that puts them in Seattle, But then does Cal get moved to 5 or do they get a #3.

 

This is the joy of it! They will not move us out of the Lincoln regional.  Technically, Creme had us at a 5 seed but moved us down to a 6 seed for "procedural" reasons. This was before the Penn State game.  And if we beat Purdue, I think we get a 5 seed with an outside shot of a 4 seed. In Creme's bracket, Cal is already in Seattle so I don't see a problem with keeping them as a 4 seed and moving us to a 5 seed in that sub-regional. Plus with ISU's upset of OSU it would make sense to move OSU to a 6 seed and send them to College station and then have Syracuse who was originally in the Seattle sub-regional to Purdue. It's obviously closer and we all know how the NCAA likes to save money. Makes sense to me. Am I missing anything? What do you think Row6?

 

I would be totally fine with going to Seattle with a potential matchup with California. 

 

*They have nobody over 6'3" 

*RPI right now is 18 - ours is 29.

*Sagarin Rating right now is 29- ours is 22.

*Losses v. Duke, @ George Washington, @ NYC v. UConn, @ Arizona State, v. Southern Cal, @ Stanford, v. Stanford. 

*They have OT wins v. Pacific, v. Oregon, v. Washington State.

*Going to (probably) finish 14-4 in conference play (2nd place), and 22-7 overall. 

 

The only real advantage I could see is that the games in Seattle would be played at the University of Washington- which is where Cal plays at every year.  Other than that- we would be a pretty good 2nd round 4/5 game with a decent/good chance to come home to play regionals in PBA!

[twister31]

 

 

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

 

Man I feel for the selection committee this year.  There are going to be a lot of unhappy people with their placement in the brackets, including us probably.  The 16 hosts sites are: Storrs, Lexington, Chapel Hill, Baton Rouge, Toledo, West Lafayette, University Park, Durham, Los Angeles, Iowa City, College Park, Knoxville, Ames, Seattle, College Station, Waco.  Now of these 16 Nebraska CAN"T go to: Storrs (#1 seed), Toledo (assume to place a #1 seed there), West Lafayette (2 B1G teams can't play in second round), University Park (same thing), Los Angeles (assuming Stanford is sent here as #1 seed), Iowa City (B1G teams), and most likely Ames (protecting #1 seed). That leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

Baton Rouge

Durham

College Park

Knoxville

Seattle

College Station

Waco

 

Now: Baylor and Tennessee are probably most definitely going to be 2 seeds. So we wouldn't sent to either of those places because we are higher than the 7/10 seeds. THIS leaves:

College Station

Seattle

College Park

Durham

Baton Rouge

Lexington

 

Now is where this gets interesting. Duke is currently listed as a 2 seed, but with the injury to Alexis Jones it's POSSIBLE that the committee could move them to a 3 seed. If they don't and leave Duke as a 2 seed, then this eliminates Durham as a place for Nebraska to go, and you STILL have Louisville who will either be a 1 seed or a 2 seed and Nebraska won't be assigned to either of those two sites.  But Louisville isn't hosting the 1/2 rounds so they will have to be sent somewhere, most likely Baton Rouge for geography reasons.  Let's say all of this is exactly what the committee is thinking too, that leaves:

Lexington

Chapel Hill

College Park

Seattle

College Station

 

Of these, the best place would be Seattle (for neutral court reasons). This year is a mess compared to recent years just because of the teams that are hosting and ones that maybe shouldn't be.  I'm sure we will all be surprised on selection day and either be relieved or angered lol.  As I have just finished typing this, if you see an error (I didn't use logic thinking, or repeated something twice) please let me know so I can eliminate the confusion.

Will Nebraska get moved out of the Lincoln region ? If The Huskers get a #4 seed the way you have them projected that puts them in Seattle, But then does Cal get moved to 5 or do they get a #3.

 

This is the joy of it! They will not move us out of the Lincoln regional.  Technically, Creme had us at a 5 seed but moved us down to a 6 seed for "procedural" reasons. This was before the Penn State game.  And if we beat Purdue, I think we get a 5 seed with an outside shot of a 4 seed. In Creme's bracket, Cal is already in Seattle so I don't see a problem with keeping them as a 4 seed and moving us to a 5 seed in that sub-regional. Plus with ISU's upset of OSU it would make sense to move OSU to a 6 seed and send them to College station and then have Syracuse who was originally in the Seattle sub-regional to Purdue. It's obviously closer and we all know how the NCAA likes to save money. Makes sense to me. Am I missing anything? What do you think Row6?

 

You mention OSU I haven't watched many of their games caught glimpses of them here and there, I see that they are on a bit of down slide losing 5 of their last 9. Or 4 of the 7 in February when the tourney seeds are made. So do you see them sliding farther then they have ?

 

I see them as a 6 seed or just barely getting a 5 seed

[twister31]

The latest bracketology has shifted some things around.  The sub-regionals in the Lincoln are still Ames, Seattle, Waco, and College Station.  We are in Seattle as a 4 seed with Cal a 5 seed. Some other interesting notes: Durham is now in the Louisville regional and as such, Duke is a 3 seed and Oklahoma State is a 6 seed. Could be a potential rematch from last year. Michigan State is in Chapel Hill, I actually think MSU might be able to pull the upset here if they can neutralize Diamond Deshields. South Carolina is a 1 seed in the Ames sub-regional; could be interesting. Of course, some of these matchups will change again, but it makes for some fun daydreaming.

[swmckewon]

The latest bracketology has shifted some things around.  The sub-regionals in the Lincoln are still Ames, Seattle, Waco, and College Station.  We are in Seattle as a 4 seed with Cal a 5 seed. Some other interesting notes: Durham is now in the Louisville regional and as such, Duke is a 3 seed and Oklahoma State is a 6 seed. Could be a potential rematch from last year. Michigan State is in Chapel Hill, I actually think MSU might be able to pull the upset here if they can neutralize Diamond Deshields. South Carolina is a 1 seed in the Ames sub-regional; could be interesting. Of course, some of these matchups will change again, but it makes for some fun daydreaming.

Michigan State would get rolled at North Carolina. 

 

It won't surprise me if Michigan State's out in the first round. 

[Bugeaters1]

 

The latest bracketology has shifted some things around.  The sub-regionals in the Lincoln are still Ames, Seattle, Waco, and College Station.  We are in Seattle as a 4 seed with Cal a 5 seed. Some other interesting notes: Durham is now in the Louisville regional and as such, Duke is a 3 seed and Oklahoma State is a 6 seed. Could be a potential rematch from last year. Michigan State is in Chapel Hill, I actually think MSU might be able to pull the upset here if they can neutralize Diamond Deshields. South Carolina is a 1 seed in the Ames sub-regional; could be interesting. Of course, some of these matchups will change again, but it makes for some fun daydreaming.

Michigan State would get rolled at North Carolina. 

 

It won't surprise me if Michigan State's out in the first round. 

 

North Carolina is just to quick for MSU and they don't have have a very good match up with DeShields.

[Bugeaters1]

So how do you see the seed now that the tourneys are about wrapped up ?

[twister31]

More confusing as ever, especially with USC's win.  I'll wait to see what Creme comes up with before I dissect it. Think we are in the 4 seed range and with a win tomorrow it would be hard to keep us out of the 3 seed

[cyinne]

Creme has now placed UCONN in the Lincoln Regional..... Says it has to do with having Louisville and UCONN playing for the 4th time this season (potentially) and economics.

 

http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10587566/women-college-basketball-rethinking-connecticut-huskies-placement-louisville-regional

[Cazzie22]

In reality, the NCAA Tournament will be a UConn coronation. Only Notre Dame can stay with them. They just have so many good players and they play great defense. I don't like the fact that they are going to win, again, but it seems to be reality. If NU can get to Lincoln, I'd like a shot at Baylor if we are a 3 and they a 2.

[kleitus]

I wouldn't mind a shot at UCONN in lincoln in a regional final.

 

Why not?  It's not like we fully expect to make the final 4.  It would be amazing.. but we don't expect it.

[Cazzie22]

I wouldn't mind a shot at UCONN in lincoln in a regional final.

 

Why not?  It's not like we fully expect to make the final 4.  It would be amazing.. but we don't expect it.

I agree, it would be a marvelous achievement for this time to advance to the "Elite 8"     I'm anxious to see where we are placed for the first and 2nd rounds.

[Bugeaters1]

I wouldn't mind a shot at UCONN in lincoln in a regional final.

 

Why not?  It's not like we fully expect to make the final 4.  It would be amazing.. but we don't expect it.

I agree, it would be a marvelous achievement for this time to advance to the "Elite 8"     I'm anxious to see where we are placed for the first and 2nd rounds.

Not to mention the crowd it would draw, Could be PBA magic ?

[huskerchode]

WHEN we make it back to PBA, it should be a no-sit game!  Pack the house and roar non-stop for 40 minutes!

[Bugeaters1]

WHEN we make it back to PBA, it should be a no-sit game!  Pack the house and roar non-stop for 40 minutes!

Is there some one on here that can make it happen. Someone needs to start getting it promoted if there is.

[Silverbacked1]

Have Connie ask for it, it worked for Tim. 

 

And I think that the women's crowd seems to be more into as a whole they the mens crowd, until the last 3 or 4 games that is.  Women's game crowds have always been fairly loud and in to it.

 

SO I don't think it would that too much of a push to make it happen.

[HB]

Have Connie ask for it, it worked for Tim. 

 

And I think that the women's crowd seems to be more into as a whole they the mens crowd, until the last 3 or 4 games that is.  Women's game crowds have always been fairly loud and in to it.

 

SO I don't think it would that too much of a push to make it happen.

 

Silverback, they are "into it" as you say, but a couple of problems in making this work:  No student section to stir it up and lead the way, and, the average age is about 103--it's definitely an older crowd.  I realize we are fresh off of feature stories on 89 year olds standing up, but they didn't have much choice.  Now, the regionals may have a different mix than our regular season crowd, and an elite 8 chance would have them fired up.   Just some thoughts....

[Silverbacked1]

 

Have Connie ask for it, it worked for Tim. 

 

And I think that the women's crowd seems to be more into as a whole they the mens crowd, until the last 3 or 4 games that is.  Women's game crowds have always been fairly loud and in to it.

 

SO I don't think it would that too much of a push to make it happen.

 

Silverback, they are "into it" as you say, but a couple of problems in making this work:  No student section to stir it up and lead the way, and, the average age is about 103--it's definitely an older crowd.  I realize we are fresh off of feature stories on 89 year olds standing up, but they didn't have much choice.  Now, the regionals may have a different mix than our regular season crowd, and an elite 8 chance would have them fired up.   Just some thoughts....

 

Very true, we might get a Red Zone there if they push it on campus, and we make it back to Lincoln.  I know I am going to try to be there with the family.

[Bugeaters1]

 

 

Have Connie ask for it, it worked for Tim. 

 

And I think that the women's crowd seems to be more into as a whole they the mens crowd, until the last 3 or 4 games that is.  Women's game crowds have always been fairly loud and in to it.

 

SO I don't think it would that too much of a push to make it happen.

 

Silverback, they are "into it" as you say, but a couple of problems in making this work:  No student section to stir it up and lead the way, and, the average age is about 103--it's definitely an older crowd.  I realize we are fresh off of feature stories on 89 year olds standing up, but they didn't have much choice.  Now, the regionals may have a different mix than our regular season crowd, and an elite 8 chance would have them fired up.   Just some thoughts....

 

Very true, we might get a Red Zone there if they push it on campus, and we make it back to Lincoln.  I know I am going to try to be there with the family.

 

I know over let's say the last four home games the student section was picking up some people. It looked like about 7 or 8 to about the first five rows for the last game. I know there is a kid that goes to all of the men's and women's games so he maybe could get it going. His name is Kevin and he knows JAdler he was last seen wearing a red body suit with red Afro hair and he is always throwing the cross bones.

[Bugeaters1]

Here is a tweet from Matt Coatney about CSm bracketology