The notion that every major conference team is better than any mid major team is completely inaccurate. If your comments are serious, you do not know what you are talking about.
Without question, the top progams in the major conferences have more talent than teams that aren't in major conferences, barring an exception or two (e.g., UNLV or Memphis (who will soon be a major conference team)). And, those top major conference teams are generally better than virtually every non-major conference team. Of course, such elite programs still lose occasionally to mid major or small conference teams (e.g., Duke losing to a Patriot League team and not quite elite losing to a squad from the MEAC). This should be well understood to anyone who follows college hoops.
But, once you start talking about entire leagues of teams, the truth is that the lesser teams in those leagues do not compare favorably to the better teams outside of those major conference teams. Since you have been referencing the ACC, look at what Boston College did last year. BC lost to 7 non-major conference teams and 4 of those teams failed to make the NCAA tournament. Elsewhere in that league, Wake Forest lost to 3 non-major conference teams that did not make the NCAAs, and Georgia Tech lost to 4 such teams. Similar results can be found throughout the major conferences. And, the majority of such major conference losses are home or neutral-site games, so it is not as if these are tricky road game losses.
Back to the Jays: Last season, Creighton played three of the Big 10 teams that did not make the NCAAs, and Creighton won all three games. But, supposedly McDermott would struggle to score 10 points a game in the ACC (he put up 20 and 9 against UNC, even though he didn't play very well, and that was a really long UNC team for him to match up against), and no other Creighton player would get any playing time on any major conference team? In case you care, Echenique’s numbers at Rutgers, when he was less experienced than he is now, were actually slightly better than his numbers have been at Creighton. Also, the Big East to Creighton transfer before him, Chad Millard from Louisville, was more productive as a Freshman in the Big East than he was while in Omaha.
None of this is to argue that every Creighton player would be logging minutes for Duke, Syracuse or Michigan State, or that Creighton recruits the same caliber players as the top tier major conference teams. Or, even that Creighton is definitely going to blow out Nebraska in Lincoln this year. I do not believe those things, and doubt that most Jays fans do. But, it is ignorant and false to claim that Creighton is inferior to every major conference program. It is not as if we're talking about SEC football vs. Sun Belt football, here. There is tons of parity in this sport, as many people's preseason pick for national champion can attest if they dare remember their 2012 trip to the Bob.
Personally, I hope Nebraska improves in the next couple of years so there can be two high quality teams in the state. It is not as though there is only room for one. Moreover, Nebraska fans need to focus on Big 10 rivals, not Creighton. Regardless of what happens between those two programs, recruiting and on-the-court battles with Penn State, Northwestern, Minnesota, Iowa, Purdue and Illinois will determine whether Nebraska can at least get back to a Nee level of quality.
Finally, I agree with the topic from another forum about moving these threads to that forum.