FGCU Game Thread: You Haven't Done Nothing

[atskooc]

 

 

How is Louisville ever going to play with this nonsense.

Who cares?

 

Point is this sucks to watch. 

 

It's a hell of a lot better than games that end with both teams in the 40's.

 

Put on your patience pants and deal with it.

[colhusker]

Great first half for the good guys.

[PAhusker]

i haven't seen us look this good in years

[atskooc]

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

[The Coach]

I'm a little concerned. That 3-2 zone is going to be tough to solve, especially if we have to play Peltz and Parker.

[GATA]

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

[colhusker]

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

[atskooc]

 

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

 

It beats bitching about those same fouls not being called in the not-so-distant past.

 

What would you prefer?

[GATA]

 

 

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

 

It beats bitching about those same fouls not being called in the not-so-distant past.

 

What would you prefer?

 

 

To let the players play and have it called consistently...

[cipsucks]

I can't believe they called that foul on Tai.  

[GATA]

That call, for example. Crap.

[atskooc]

 

 

 

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

 

It beats bitching about those same fouls not being called in the not-so-distant past.1

 

What would you prefer?

 

 

To let the players play and have it called consistently...

 

It wasn't consistent? 

 

Was it less consistent than in years' past?

[atskooc]

That call, for example. Crap.

That call has nothing to do with the perimeter rule changes.

[a0t0w0]

I like this shields kid

[GATA]

 

 

 

 

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

 

It beats bitching about those same fouls not being called in the not-so-distant past.1

 

What would you prefer?

 

 

To let the players play and have it called consistently...

 

It wasn't consistent? 

 

Was it less consistent than in years' past?

 

 

No. Let me be clearer: To let players play WHILE calling fouls consistently. They aren't letting players play.

[a0t0w0]

Sorry 49'r had to

[atskooc]

Nice drive there!

[GATA]

 

That call, for example. Crap.

That call has nothing to do with the perimeter rule changes.

 

 

Still a bad call. Refs calling things too close.

[atskooc]

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

 

It beats bitching about those same fouls not being called in the not-so-distant past.1

 

What would you prefer?

 

 

To let the players play and have it called consistently...

 

It wasn't consistent? 

 

Was it less consistent than in years' past?

 

 

No. Let me be clearer: To let players play WHILE calling fouls consistently. They aren't letting players play.

 

Then how the hell did we score 39 points by halftime?  We shot 12 free throws (and so did they)...is that a lot?

[atskooc]

 

 

That call, for example. Crap.

That call has nothing to do with the perimeter rule changes.

 

 

Still a bad call. Refs calling things too close.

 

Bad calls have always been part of the game, and always will be.  That has nothing to do with the rule changes you're bitching about.

[tcp]

wow. yuck.

[GATA]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were nineteen fouls called in the first half.  On pace for thirty-eight.

 

First game last year?  Thirty-four fouls called total.

 

Doesn't seem terribly different.

 

It's not the number of fouls, it's the fouls that were called.

 

This

 

It beats bitching about those same fouls not being called in the not-so-distant past.1

 

What would you prefer?

 

 

To let the players play and have it called consistently...

 

It wasn't consistent? 

 

Was it less consistent than in years' past?

 

 

No. Let me be clearer: To let players play WHILE calling fouls consistently. They aren't letting players play.

 

Then how the hell did we score 39 points by halftime?  We shot 12 free throws (and so did they)...is that a lot?

 

 

Sigh...

[GATA]

 

 

 

That call, for example. Crap.

That call has nothing to do with the perimeter rule changes.

 

 

Still a bad call. Refs calling things too close.

 

Bad calls have always been part of the game, and always will be.  That has nothing to do with the rule changes you're bitching about.

 

 

Got it, guy. Let's move on.

[colhusker]

Another crap call - painful to watch

[tcp]

yes!!! justice!!!!