Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, arliepro said:

if the women's committee is putting as much weight on the metrics as the men's, our chances are not good.

Our metrics are much better then the mens.  Even though the WBB committee doesn't yet use the quadrant system like the mens it still shows the difference between our men and women.  1 quad one win for the men and 7 for the women.  Our 8-2 road record is better then most teams except for the top 5 rated teams.  That also has to account for something.  I think we are in and higher then originally thought.  I may be setting myself up for a huge disappointment tomorrow but I don't think so.

Posted

I was thinking Minnesota was firmly in based on how they finished, that was a surprise to me. The committee must be valuing schedule strength based on this list. Thought Minnesota was firmly in based on how they finished and their conference record, their weak non-conference schedule must be hurting them. On the other hand Oklahoma really challenged themselves early in the season leading to their lackluster overall record but a decent RPI. Think Buffalo, Creighton, Minnesota, & Rutgers get in from this list.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...