Leaderboard

Why force us to assume no attrition? When was the last time we didn't have ANY attrition? I don't think assuming no attrition is a very likely scenario.

No, no, the one I'm thinking of was from maybe Married with Children and Bud wants to know the difference between theory and reality and so Al asks Peg and the daughter something about whether they'd be willing to sleep with, I dunno, whomever, for a million bucks and they both say that absolutely they would sleep with the guy for a million bucks. So then Al turns to Bud and says, "Now, in THEORY, we're millionaires. But in REALITY, we're living with a couple of sluts."

Not that there is anything wrong with that!

Clearly Andre is bullying him and taking his food.

the +/- is somewhat overrated. Rivers hasn't played great, but he's clearly the best bench player right now.

The +/- might be overrated in terms of evaluating a player, but it has to mean something that we are doing poorly when he is in the game relative to the other bench players who have about as many minutes. I guess we'll see how it changes going forward as our competition increases and we add Shavon Shields to the mix.