If you're referring to everything before post 4 on this thread, that's an accurate statement.
No, it's an accurate statement period. I think I've made it pretty clear. You cannot evaluate recruiting success in a vacuum. You do it by comparing where you are with where others, similarly situated, are.
If our last 4 commits had all been pursued by Iowa and we'd beaten out Iowa for all of them, I'd have pointed out that we'd beaten Iowa for 4 straight commits. But the thread -- and the intent behind it, which I don't see how you think you can judge -- wouldn't have been about Iowa. It would still have been about us. I was remarking on what I think is pretty substantial forward strides in recruiting FOR US.
Poo poo it all you want but the fact that we won 4 straight head-to-head battles says something. About US. (And maybe about them, too, but that wasn't my focus. You didn't see me doing any endzone dances over the recruits they've missed on.)
I don't see why you're making such a big deal about beating out a mid-major for recruits.