This is a tough question for me. If this were the NBA, it would be an easy answer for me, we got better players than we lost so we got the better end of the stick. In essence our new players would have a better video game rating than the ones who left.
There are just so many other aspects to college basketball, and that's personally why I love it more than the NBA. These are 18-22 year old kids, what often gets lost is the team chemistry, the adjusting to a new city, the adjusting to a new academic program, the relationships that the players have with each other and the coaches, girlfriends back home, and a myriad of other issues that aren't related to someone's basketball talent.
Who knows, the adjustments and fresh starts for everyone could be the best thing that happened to everyone on both sides, but it also might not. I just wonder would a Michael Jacobson that has been at Nebraska with the same coaching staff, system, and comfort level for 4 years be better in the long run than a more talented player that comes in for 1 or two years?
I guess this is just a long way of me saying the new guys are probably more talented, so to answer the specific question posted I think it is a great "trade". But my cop out answer is we will have to wait and see how the new guys adjust to Nebraska, and how well old guys adjust at their new homes.