HuskerFever

I would, but I currently have all my money tied up in helping out a Nigerian prince.

Well...most names on this board aren't "likely" so just let them run with the hypotheticals. I suppose we have to remain optimistic, but history shows the fans aren't getting any of their top 10 choices.

When Moos talks about being competitive in the Big Ten, this doesn't bode well for a 7 year stint: Avg conf standing: 9.4 Avg conf standing (at rate of 14 teams): 9.8 Avg conf wins: 7.3 Avg conf wins (at rate of 20 games): 8.0 Avg conf losses: 10.4 Avg conf losses (at rate of 20 games): 11.4 Avg games behind first: 7.4 Avg % of season behind: 41%

All hypothetical, but I bet we could write up a clause where the contract is negated should something come out of the trial. But 1. we probably don't want to get involved with this at all and 2. we could be out of a coach in May.

It's not a good look, that's for sure. Poorly timed and, really, probably too candid especially when you're publicly talking about the people who pay you.

I just don't understand why this is such an admired option to people, but I'm more than open to hearing people's position. Maybe I'm just not seeing what other people are about Lue in the collegiate circuit.

Might want to look in the mirror and get out of your world to realize that many people on this board have a similar view as you about the coach, but they're choosing not to make every single post on this board about how much they hate Miles and want to see him get fired and move his family out of Lincoln. I'm sure you've got some good perspectives on hoops other than beating the same drum about the inevitability about a coach. How about we talk about those things instead? Otherwise, just join the other handful of people who only visit this board and comment when things are very down in the program.

That's not a completely fair comparison. You also have to factor in the difference in coverage (i.e. double teams, pressure on star players, etc.). But that said, if you're a star player you should be able to find a way to still perform under higher pressure situation compared to the bench players.

For what it's worth. These games of interest are theoretically still relevant until NU drops to Purdue and/or Michigan.

To played a huge role in our last basketball hire as well.

Don't - 62 'Due - 81

For what............Nebraska just doubled its revenue and has quadrupled it in the last 4 years.........It's time to spend it on football and men's basketball. I'm with you. I'm saying that they're likely already tied toward certain short-term/long-term budget items for these sports. That just seems to be how the government and government entities tend to work.

I'm almost certain that money has been allocated in the budget already.

This is scary. Read this and replace it with "Nebraska": https://www.thechampaignroom.com/2013/1/22/3903624/visiting-your-own-grave

That's ridiculous. You know the headline would read "Nebraska basketball coach takes Huskers to tourney with 90% chance to win first tourney game; Coach has heart attack right before the game, Huskers lose"

Per @trickey: NU 59 PU 72

Submit predictions below.

We have two more chances left. Either: 1. Our playoffs start on February 23 2. Or the playoffs start on March 13

I think we found it. The headstone reads: "February 19, 2019: Here Lies Rock Bottom."

All twelve Penn State fans are chanting for their bench warmers to come in. We're losing by 28. To the worst team in the Big Ten. THIS IS ROCK BOTTOM.

That's disrespectful to horse manure.

Alright guys. Let's get this deficit back to 10 or less. That will help us out with our NET scor........oh, what am I kidding?

The best defensive player of the night? The shot clock.

Even with some heavy hitters coming into PBA, I don't think we're going to fill all the seats for the rest of the year. Then again, if Penn State is the floor, we're still doing alright in attendance.

Right now? Yes. But it's still not completely out of reach. But our odds are probably closer to 10-15% now.