HUD

Years ago we were routinely out rebounded but that was a priority to correct which we did for the most part. And not totally because of Markowki. The next step is to correct the turnover problem. Some of that was from our basically young team. We had way too many unforced ones which can be the difference in winning or losing a close game.

I know it's early to talk about next season but what the hell. I will throw in my 2 cents worth. Assuming every one comes back that can and Natalie has a successful recovery we could take another step up the ladder. But we need a couple of portal players that could be starters as mentioned in numerous postings in the past. We will have three remaining players next year that will all be sophmores that are high quality starters. The rest of the remaining team would provide a great bench. From the portal we need a center to patrol the middle and a tough and fast defensive minded guard that can handle the ball and take it to the hoop..

Amiah Hargrove needs more playing time. Excellent stats and is physically tough. Needs to play some at the three where we have been weak.

Won't Lucy Olsen be out of eligibility?

I will agree that Maly was probably our biggest miss as defined by someone who made it big and was a thorn in our side for 4 years.

What about Allison and Alexis. They were top players in the state we got.

Maybe next year we should try Hargrove at the 3 position. That's what she was recruited for initially. Could be could good for certain matchups. She made nice steady improvement through out the year. Can take the ball to the hoop and has a nice outside shot and was our leading rebounder against UCLA playing only 14 minutes. She has the size we lack for next year as our guards are 5-4, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10, 5-10, 5-11 and 6 ft.

This gives us another quad one win!

I believe the big is a freshman.

If I remember right we had just lost Potts for the year a couple of days earlier.

If we can't beat Rutgers we should go home.

After seeing her on videos she is very long especially in the legs. This is something we don't have outside of Britt P. On the downside she is thin with her wt listed at 125 #. WBB is becoming very physical in the Big Ten so that may have caused a bit of hesitancy by some teams. I would hope she didn't take many visits because she was very picky waiting for the right team. Look at Alexis. She didn't have many teams after her initially either as she didn't play her sophomore year in High School due to injury and then became a late bloomer.

I sure hope so. After Allison and Britt our cupboard is some what bare for point guards that can consistently get it done.

I graduated from both Univ. of Nebr. and Univ. of Wash. I was at the game and took absolutely no pleasure watching Washington win. This is the first time I have watched us get so mismatched against a team with a 50/50 record at our place. The coaches did not have us ready in any shape or form. We let a good opportunity to help our seeding escape. It will be very interesting to see if Amy can get anything out of the portal for next year without losing anyone.

Not all our players shooting 3's were closely guarded as Alexis had three wide open ones and missed all three. She is shooting 17% for the year taking 40 shots. That's why she is so open.