This is my issue with this argument.
First off...Copeland has produced exactly zero here thus far. Now...I think his ceiling if healthy is off the charts and is an NBA caliber prospect, but also think it is fair to wait to see what happens with him. Second....we don't know what other dominoes would have fallen in the meantime. Maybe with added depth Fuller would have transferred sooner. Maybe we don't take Horne, who transfers out after a year. Maybe we would have been more selective and not given Evelyn a spot two years ago. Or maybe Palmer is the odd one out. Maybe with the added depth last year in the frontcourt we win an extra game or two and White feels better about our chances to dance and stays. Blah blah blah. Point is we don't know how things would've come out.
Would I take Roby or Copeland over him..absolutely. And in no way am I saying that we made a mistake with him. I agree with you in that I don't think he's a dynamic player. Just saying I don't get the dodged the bullet comment considering our depth issues the last two years and would have most certainly preferred him over a Fuller. Maybe I just struggle with the better off without approach over said player when we are sitting here with the success we've had.