cornfed24-7

I agree to a point. My baseline is a cumulative viewing of 3 seasons. I hope he succeeds and has them ready to play at the begining of the season instead of the end. Unless of course he runs the table then you do you Hoiberg.

Don't worry I was right there with you on that hill. A road win against a ranked team is definitely Hoibergs signature win. I am stoked for the fortunes these past few games for the players and Hoiberg. I haven't posted much lately because I don't want to be "that guy". But I have huge concerns Hoiberg can get his team playing like this in time for it to matter. He kinda did this last year too. Hell, maybe his plan all along was to run the table in the tournament That would REALLY shut me up

To be fair to the computer its somewhere between 15-20 for me.

I am going with they have rallied around their coach. Which is a good sign.

I did my usual check in at halftime I was pleasantly surprised

I can see that now. No. I have zero idea what Hoiberg has to do to coach a 5th season. So my thought was each person that answered can decide what that is. And then decide which is more likely.

Brutal question to answer isn't it

Nah man semantics.

You speak like its fact any of these guys will be here if there is a change and I find that silly.

I wouldn't bet the farm on that. I would say the odds are on the next guy walking into the exact situation that Hoiberg did.

The main thing I took from Trevs statement is he is Vise Chancellor, Director of Athletics . And to me thats WAY cooler than Athletic Director. If someone must address me formally I know which I'm choosing.

Were you though? I don't see much in that first post that has been confirmed

Nope. Just waiting a year to name them

I hope you're right too. But the way I read it its 4M. And if we do make a change next year the odds are slim those recruits stay. Its a punt. And sometimes thats the best move.

Hey we can still top one of those!

Imma take the over

Yeah their 7 wins really support this.

Definitely 3.5M can matter. Not sure it does in this case. I just don't buy that as a reason to keep Hoiberg. Now if there is a MAJOR restructuring of his contract I'd listen. I personally think Hoiberg is cooked. I can understand why people point to his time at ISU. I just see it the other way. ISU is the anomaly not NU.

Because a buyout of 15mil is sooooooooo much less than 18.5.

Nah. Because then it would really hurt knowing we had him but Hoiberg ushered him out as part of a roster turnover.

I would take it a step further and say make it a priority as part of your recruiting strategy. Identify the top 2-3 kids in the state and try to get one each year.

Pfft I'll be out in front of the arena erecting the statue.