They gave teams more value for how they performed in the latter part of the season, previous rankings meant something, and a couple other things off the top of my head that are supposedly removed from this year's evaluation process.
What adds complexity to me is that this quadrant system is brand new this year. If we were still under last year's system I would feel far better.
So how much will they emphasize this new methodology versus the resume test versus the eyeball test?
Agree on the importance. But I'm not so sure we would be in yet in that scenario either. Swapping the losses doesn't help our biggest resume blunder of quality wins.
Playing Illinois again would just be another "well you can't beat any good teams" argument. It's a trap game. Does us no good. I'm not sure why this is even a question yet. Illinois has 2 more games to play in the tournament before they would even get to us.
I need a little positivity right now. I can't handle hearing from the media after every single win that we're no good.
Going with a homer article here: https://www.landof10.com/nebraska/nebraska-basketball-ncaa-tournament-2018-cornhuskers-selection-committee
I'll be shocked if we're not #1 or #2 in the "First Four Out." Lunardi has been doing his song and dance orchestrating it where we needed to get to the Double Bye and beat Michigan all along.
TWO THINGS THIS HHCC ROUND:
1) Score prediction for Nebraska neut. Michigan (as usual).
2) (BONUS -5 points) Predicting the exact number of Big Ten tournament wins by Nebraska (e.g. I am looking for an answer like "5")
Note: I will update this thread to include the actual opponent once it is determined after Thursday's match-up of the #5/#12/#13 seed.