Some teams overachieve. Some underachieve. Would you accuse this team of overachieving when you compare our talent level to our win/loss record? Or do you think we've won about as many games we should have lost as we've lost games we should have won?
Maybe you haven't been following the board, but there's been a lot of angst about how much worse this team is than it was a year ago and suggesting that last year was a fluke and a one year flash in the pan.
And I'm saying there were a couple of hiccups this season where we clearly lost to inferior teams and you take away those losses and we'd be about where everyone would have expected us to be this season.
In other words, we ain't that bad. Except for a couple of hiccups, this is about the team we thought we'd have. That's been my point.
Thread makes all good points. Rhode Island turned out to be a pretty good team after all. Hawaii must have been playing way over their head as they took Wichita State down the wire in the following game, losing by one point 80-79 in OT.
It seems to me the two worst losses are Incarnate Word (last minute lapses, or maybe poor BB IQ), and just lethargy in the loss to a weakened Michigan.