Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, hskr4life said:


Wilcher, Tominaga, Gary, Kieta off the bench too.

 

The big question is would the team be better taking chemistry into account.  No doubt Bryce would be a great player (added strength, experience...) but would the chemistry and defensive intensity be there?  This could be a team that would allow Bryce to do his thing on offense and the rest dig in on D.

Posted
1 minute ago, Navin R. Johnson said:

 

The big question is would the team be better taking chemistry into account.  No doubt Bryce would be a great player (added strength, experience...) but would the chemistry and defensive intensity be there?  This could be a team that would allow Bryce to do his thing on offense and the rest dig in on D.

It could be a scary GOOD Team, but we’ll never know. They (the McGowens) had bigger fish to fry & I’m excited to see how this plays out…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...