Jump to content

FredsSlacks

Members
  • Posts

    3,573
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by FredsSlacks

  1. there is going to be no shortage of depth next year.
  2. this guy looks legit. like mast with more athletic ability.
  3. crazy we still have 4 open spots after replacing a large portion of what we lost.
  4. so basically as of now we are replacing allick/kesie/lawrence with worster/morgan/uhlis? personally seems like a downgrade in talent but luckily we still have more open spots.
  5. as it stands 4 of our top 6 guys from a 23 win team are returning. if we lose any of those top 4 it starts getting dicey.
  6. i would have projected him to start at the 3 with gary at the 4, but i also don't know what other transfers we are bringing in.
  7. ik this is mostly a joke, but not having flights here has to be a negative for recruiting.
  8. very odd. he played a good amount for a true freshman on a tournament team. offseason not off to a good start.
  9. this is definitely a transfer i'll be following post nebraska out of pure curiosity. he'll be starting his playing career at age 21 next season.
  10. I can't blame trev for wanting a 30% raise and be in the SEC. what else was there for him to do at nebraska anyways? he already hired his football coach and got the stadium project started. if anything his job security here could have quickly wavered if rhule puts up 2 more 5 win seasons.
  11. these gotta be the worst 1st round locations ever. outside of brooklyn you could not vacation to any of these cities.
  12. the good news is that losing to indiana wouldn't be a bad loss at this point where losing to penn st/mich would have been.
  13. i'll never forget fred benching him in the btt for walk-on.... we've come a long way in a few years.
  14. its insane to me that as of this morning most pundits had mich st ahead of us....no sane person can look at their resume and say it's better than ours.
  15. that is the best we could have hoped for...should be fun
  16. with k state win back to being a quad 1 victory and the 'can't win on the road' myth being debunked, this team should be closer to 5 seed than a 10 seed IMO
  17. not saying i thought this team would make the tourney, but it was definitely thought to be the deepest roster in the hoiberg era before the season started.
  18. which doesn't seem impossible to me. we beat 1 and nearly beat the other on the road.
  19. last year indiana got a 4 seed at 22-10 and lost in the semis of the BTT.
  20. i would think beating mich plus winning the BTT would get us as high as a 3 seed. especially if the opponents are wisconsin/illinois/purdue
  21. i think we are fine. worst case scenario IMO is we lose the next 2 and they put us in dayton.
×
×
  • Create New...