PG: Watson v. Webster. Webster is a better defender but Watson is a better "true" point gaurd. I expect them both to make jumps offensively. The slightest of edge to Webster.
SG: Gill v. White. These two could both have quite the game. White isnt known for his defense and I read Gill can be hot and cold with his. Both are said to be great scorers (In different ways) but I'll go with who is proven. Edge to White.
SF: Roby v. Horne. Would be a really good match up of the two freshmen. I would love to watch them gaurd each other in real life for a scrimmage. Both players seems to be extremely versatile. Edge to Roby.
PF: McVeigh v. Morrow. Both play different styles at the 4. Morrow could beat up McVeigh inside and on the boards and is more athletic than McVeigh. But McVeigh can stretch the floor and force Morrow to defend parts of the court he is not comfortable defending. Plus McVeigh 7'1 wingspan will help neutralize Morrow's athletic advantage. Tie.
C: Jacobson v. Tshimanga. This will just be another day on the court for Jacobson (I'm sure he is used to playing undersized by now). Jacobson is a smart tough player with experience and can make Jordy defend outside the paint. I'm sure Tshimanga can give him trouble at times. Like mentioned in an earlier post, if this were at the end of the season I might take Jordy. But edge to Jacobson.
Bench: Fuller v. Laws. This isn't really fair imo and I think we should have allowed Palmer bc he is eligible for scrimmages!!! But rules are rules. Edge to Fuller.
Series: 49rs 4, Pimps 3.
49r prevails due to versatility of his lineup and having one extra scholarship player. Pimps team puts up a valiant effort as AW3 and Tai go down swinging but can't overcome the inability of their bigs not being able to gaurd the three ball from McVeigh and Jacobson.
PS: If this were actually going down (which I wish it were) I would make Palmer eligible to give each team 6 scholarship players and then just have Laws be a two way player for both teams.