Crush78

43

He might not have worn 'Jr' on his jersey, but his dad was also named Anton, played for East Carolina in the 90s.

I'm pretty sure it was Anton gill who was the 4th junior, not roby

What my mother in law does to a steak is a crime. No seasoning. Grill to leather, cut into pieces, microwave.

He hedged on that later on when he was talking d matchups w creighton as an example and made it sound like Ulis or Lawrence would be 1 starter. Didn't mention Williams or Tominaga. So I'd imagine 1 of them would be the 5th starter in his mind. Lorenzi(creighton beat writer & cohost) seemed pretty incredulous when Sam said starting 3-4-5 would be Gary-Allick-Mast. I'd agree, I think 2 of those 3 start alongside Tominaga and 1 of Lawrence/Williams & 1 of Ulis/Lloyd

I was giving them to 10th & vine before the world fell off

Also a probably related note: To the Creighton people I know, there might as well be a black hole between Lincoln and Denver.

I think where you are makes a big difference. The further west in Nebraska you get, the more its just some school in omaha that you don't really care about.

Rooting for Xavier this weekend to get to the final 4. If they made it and Creighton doesn't, it would make Creighton the only current Big East team without an appearance in the final 4.

Right, he's also sacrificed some regular season wins to do so. A lot of wins as a middling seed. He could get guys to win the B1G and get a 2 seed, instead he sacrifices a few conference wins to get a team built for March.

That is just how it is now. Honestly half roster seems better than average in the current environment.

Wilcher's foul on the desperation 3 was the killer in my opinion. Minny was feeling the pressure & ripe to choke it away before that bailout foul

With bith healthy, I believe we end around the same place as we did. If only 1 was lost, I think we end up worse than we did. It took losing both to really change our playing style. With only 1 gone, I think we would've stuck with how we were trying to grind out games, but been less effective at it. Losing both forced our hand to modify because our roster was no longer able to play that way effectively.

It's tough to say, but we probably would'vehave been better than3-9 in conference with them healthy. But I also doubt we would've had enough offense to go 6-2 down the stretch.

Huskers 77 Gophers 70 2 wins

No. Especially since beating Minny gives no boost whatsoever.

Wilcher nice find to breidenbach, then follows up with terrible turnover. Can he make 2 good plays in a row or is it always trading off?

Huskers 72 Hawkeyes 84

I believe it's record against the top teams in the league. Both lost to Purdue, so it would basically ride on who ends up with a win vs the highest seeded team. Right now that would be ours against Maryland, but 2-8 is such who knows who will end up there.

Said it was a bobble, never had control. Which was crap. It was either a carry or a walk.

There was a 2 minute stretch in the middle of the 2nd half where we didn't even get a shot attempt.

2 buckets in the last 14 minutes ain't gonna win many games

Huskers 66 Sparty 70 3

These are probably our "worst" losses. Replace these 2 games with Directional A&M & Cupcake St Ws, we are not in, but are at least still being mentioned as a team with a chance.

Rumored to be a candidate for the Cal job.