Crush78

Huskers 82

Aggies 76

1 win

Huskers 79

Hoosiers 66

1 win

Huskers 73

Wolverines 67

Huskers 77

Scarlet Knights 63

4

1 hour ago, hskr4life said:

We’re going to rank a team 25th that has a less than 10% chance to be an at large?  Interesting.

 

Arizona state at 14-14 has 10 more vote points than us?  Interesting.

 

 

A voter screwed up and put Arizona St 8th instead of Arizona

11 minutes ago, hskr4life said:

That’s a…. Wildly interesting stat.  Top 4 or bottom 4… no in between

The only times we started Thursday in the B1G were the 1st 2 years when there werent Wednesday games 

IF we get top 4, we will not have played our 1st tourney game on Thursday for 11 straight seasons. 

5 hours ago, Cookie Miller Wasn't Dirty said:

The thing is it’s a pretty safe bet they’d put Kansas and/or Iowa State in Omaha. They are trending for 2 and 3 seeds.

 

Now whether they’d elect to put Nebraska in there with them is a different story, essentially removing their home court advantages if they were to play us in round 2.

KU & ISU are the most likely top 4 seeds based on the "bracketing principals" the committee talks about. Especially since Creighton cant go because they are the hosts.

Huskers 70

Buckeyes 74

Huskers 79

Yellow rodents 70

Is Coleman even on the team anymore? Not listed in the availability, but didn’t get in when we cleared the bench in the last minutes?

Huskers 74

Hoosiers 79

22 hours ago, Art Vandalay said:

We can definitely agree to disagree. I saw his game up close all summer long. Very confident in my thoughts but I’ve been wrong more than a few times in my life. It would be his second transfer as he got no time at Chicago so unless he grads early he needs a waiver

If the 2nd transfer rule still exists for next season, which is definitely in doubt.

Huskers 82

Nittie kitties 75

Huskers 81

Wolverines 72

2  5+ boards

They've dumped billions into streaming sp they can make an app where you can watch sports from different providers in 1 place?

I mean, cable boxes have been doing that since the 1980s, so it doesnt seem like it was worth it.

3 minutes ago, BigTate said:

That foul with 3 seconds let in regulation to give Illinois free throws and a chance to win was fucking unbelievable. I wanted to punch my TV when that was called. There were lots of other terrible calls as others have pointed out but that one changed the game. We won the game if not for that crap foul!

Right. That one sticks out because of timing, but also because the officials were going with the prison rules (no felony, no penalty) all game then call that touch foul.

Huskers 74

Wildcats 80

Huskers 72

Illini 81

I dont understand why they didn't go to 16. I get you dont want to add another day, which eliminates 17/18, but why not 16, you'd have 4 games per day W/T/F instead of 3/4/4 for 15.

8 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

*-Nebraska went 10-21 from 3-point range, the 12th time NU reached double digits on 3-pointers. NU fell to 9-3 this season when hitting at least 10 3-pointers.
*-Nebraska was held to a season-low 51 points, the first time the Huskers were held under 60 points this season.

51 points with 10 3s is hard to do. 

Huskers 76

Badgers 72

No true pg really hurt. That was not a very aggressive press and it gave us fits. Even when we broke it, we didnt get any easy buckets off of it.

Also, those 2 guys off the bench who rained 3 on us to close the gap early were huge. We started pretty good on D and basically were daring them to beat us with somebody other than Young or Reese, and they did. Then our d went in the crapper.

Huskers 74

Terps 77

2 hours ago, throwback said:

I saw on Twitter there are some questions floating around the legality of how law enforcement obtained the information to begin its investigation - not sure if it's true or not, but, if so, it could at least put the legal charges against all the players in some jeopardy.

 

I doubt it would affect the NCAA portion of the punishment, since they're separate, but who knows with the NCAA these days. Probably would take several months to sort everything out legally regardless, so it ultimately probably won't mean much for his eligibility at NU.

 

Yeah, sounds like some possible sketchiness with obtaining the info. 

But, didn't Ulis already do a plea agreement? So it wouldn't make much difference now legally for him if its already ajudicated.