TomEadesSucks Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 There was a lot of gnashing of teeth when Gesell picked Iowa, but honestly, right now Benny is playing better than Gesell, and it's not really even close, IMO. Not saying I wouldn't take Gesell on this team, but who would have thought Benny vs Mike could be a debate? Silverbacked1, Shuttlesworth and HuskerActuary 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GATA Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 There was a lot of gnashing of teeth when Gesell picked Iowa, but honestly, right now Benny is playing better than Gesell, and it's not really even close, IMO. Not saying I wouldn't take Gesell on this team, but who would have thought Benny vs Mike could be a debate? Not me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBigRed Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Gesell was 0-10 tonight. Not at all the collegiate player many thought he was going to be. I would honestly be shocked if Tai Webster's sophomore stats next year are not better than Gesell's this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackshirt83 Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Benny has better coaching. Silverbacked1, Norm Peterson, 49r and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuroranHusker Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 This year Iowa's team, if they didn't have Roy Devyn Marble, would be totally screwed (and they still are with him). Gesell's all-around game tonight looked more like a train wreck than a legit B1G PG... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busticket Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Gesell has been pedestrian at best, and not clutch at all. Benny is way better at this point. He makes plays that have a huge impact on the outcome. It is pretty funny how things work out sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalfan Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 He is better than his performance of late. We gotta keep sample sizes in mind when evaluating. I am pretty sure we would be better off with him here. But it doesn't really matter. He isn't here and he isn't getting the coaching we have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hhcscott Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 I don't see the Benny vs Mike comparison, their roles are different. Tai and Mike are having similar struggles, the main difference is that Nebraska has been progressing and Iowa regressing since about January Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49r Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 All the Iowa hate this morning. Good...good... Red Rum, hhcmatt and Silverbacked1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kldm64 Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 There was a lot of gnashing of teeth when Gesell picked Iowa, but honestly, right now Benny is playing better than Gesell, and it's not really even close, IMO. Not saying I wouldn't take Gesell on this team, but who would have thought Benny vs Mike could be a debate? That might be a bit of a stretch. Don't judge how good Gesell is based on just his last game. He gets lots of steals and is very quick and takes care of the ball. Mike is a very smooth player and pushes the tempo for them. If I had to choose, I'd take Gesell as his overall game is better than Parkers. Benny has been playing very well but Gesell is a much better overall player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huskerbaseball13 Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Maybe. But Gessell>>>>>>>Webster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hhcmatt Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 Maybe. But Gessell>>>>>>>Webster No He is better than his performance of late. We gotta keep sample sizes in mind when evaluating. I am pretty sure we would be better off with him here. But it doesn't really matter. He isn't here and he isn't getting the coaching we have. Yes Nebrasketballer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuroranHusker Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 All the Iowa hate this morning. Good...good... GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebrasketballer Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 Maybe. But Gessell>>>>>>>Webster No He is better than his performance of late. We gotta keep sample sizes in mind when evaluating. I am pretty sure we would be better off with him here. But it doesn't really matter. He isn't here and he isn't getting the coaching we have.Yes +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.