Jump to content

uneblinstu's postgame chatter : vol 17; ed 26-Northwestern

Bugeaters1
 Share

Recommended Posts

hhcmatt

hhcmatt

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, TourneyBound said:

No kidding, on a side note how is Jake able to call game when he isn't there....

 

They remote him in.  He did the same thing for the Oregon game.

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

hhcmatt
hhcmatt

The 23 minutes, 10 points, and 7 rebounds were all season highs for Braxton Meah

Faux Mike Peltz
Faux Mike Peltz

I’m going to give the guy who gets criticized a lot - a lot of credit for his play down the stretch, and that’s Brax. You can’t teach 7’1” with a wingspan like that. He had a few plays where altered s

throwback
throwback

Juwan was so big in turning that thing around - just refused to let us continue playing so poorly.    Essegian was a very willing rebounder in the second half - he turned up the physicality

hhcmatt

hhcmatt

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Huskerpapa said:

Yet after the previous game I would have said Andrew earned more time, and the two or three games before that, Berke played well and earned time. 

Point being, all of our bigs are playing better, and who plays, and when they play, is like a chess match. 

 

We're playing the hot hands and after our team meeting it seems like we have better buy-in on the concept

hhcmatt

hhcmatt

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bugeaters1 said:

Why wasn't Jake there? Is he sick?

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk
 

 

It's because they're not coming home inbetween games

AuroranHusker

AuroranHusker

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, AuroranHusker said:

 

Grandfather Jerry Bush was 81-132 at NU, from 1954-63.

 

Fred is 80-103 currently.

 

 

 

Also noticed that Jerry Bush was 38-80 in conference games. And, Fred is currently 37-77 in the Big Ten.

millerhusker

millerhusker

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, HuscurAdam said:

 

It would have mattered to *some* people if NW would have thrown one in at the buzzer. 😉

Yeah I retract that comment. It DOES matter. If the roles were reversed I'm sure they would've called that on Nebraska. Call it on the home team too damnit. 

HuscurAdam

HuscurAdam

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said:

Why wasn't that an and-one dunk for Brice at the end of the game? He didn't put the ball down again & he had gathered already for the dunk. That's what I wondered...

 

Because Nebrasketball.

hhcmatt

hhcmatt

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said:

Why wasn't that an and-one dunk for Brice at the end of the game? He didn't put the ball down again & he had gathered already for the dunk. That's what I wondered...

 

I assume it was for the same reason that a guy won't call a foul until he sees the ball not go in.

cozrulz

cozrulz

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said:

Why wasn't that an and-one dunk for Brice at the end of the game? He didn't put the ball down again & he had gathered already for the dunk. That's what I wondered...

 

 

It doesn't help that the ref points to the wrong spot.  The foul comes around the big 10 logo.  Brice took an extra step after the foul.  What are the rules?  I would have said his dunking motion started during the foul.  The defensive player didn't really go for the ball either.  Luckily Brice made one foul shot so it didn't matter.

AuroranHusker

AuroranHusker

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, cozrulz said:

 

It doesn't help that the ref points to the wrong spot.  The foul comes around the big 10 logo.  Brice took an extra step after the foul.  What are the rules?  I would have said his dunking motion started during the foul.  The defensive player didn't really go for the ball either.  Luckily Brice made one foul shot so it didn't matter.

 

Well, it matters in getting the call correct. Yes, the circumstance ended well for Nebraska, but the refs ought to strive to get it right no matter the outcome of that particular ballgame.

 

cozrulz

cozrulz

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, AuroranHusker said:

 

Well, it matters in getting the call correct. Yes, the circumstance ended well for Nebraska, but the refs ought to strive to get it right no matter the outcome of that particular ballgame.

 

 

That's why I was wondering what the rules say.  Looking at it in slow mo, Brice's arm probably gets grabbed before he starts his motion.  He is fouled, his foot lands on the big 10 logo then he takes one more step and dunks.  Since there is no continuation the foul is probably on the floor.  My guess is the ref got it right.  I do wonder about making a play like that an intentional foul or extending what's allowed for continuation.  The other option with this one would have been for the ref to not make a call.

AuroranHusker

AuroranHusker

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, cozrulz said:

 

That's why I was wondering what the rules say.  Looking at it in slow mo, Brice's arm probably gets grabbed before he starts his motion.  He is fouled, his foot lands on the big 10 logo then he takes one more step and dunks.  Since there is no continuation the foul is probably on the floor.  My guess is the ref got it right.  I do wonder about making a play like that an intentional foul or extending what's allowed for continuation.  The other option with this one would have been for the ref to not make a call.

 

Not making a call at all would have been a lot easier since it was 1.7 seconds on the clock... but, yeah, where's the ref going to the monitor on this one when they did for others less egregious in the game?!

 

roscoe

roscoe

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, cozrulz said:

 

It doesn't help that the ref points to the wrong spot.  The foul comes around the big 10 logo.  Brice took an extra step after the foul.  What are the rules?  I would have said his dunking motion started during the foul.  The defensive player didn't really go for the ball either.  Luckily Brice made one foul shot so it didn't matter.

I noticed the same thing on where he pointed at floor. If that was spot where foul occurred Brice was well on his way to the dunk. He also could've just raised his arm with fist indicating foul rather going TV Teddy.

brfrad

brfrad

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, hhcmatt said:

Did Berke travel with the team? I did not see him on the bench

If he didn't that means he probably is out for the PSU game as the team was not coming back.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...