Jump to content

2022-2023 KenPom Rankings Thread


49r

Recommended Posts

This season's Pomeroy rankings are out, and I'll do a full update as soon as I get the time.  But I will leave you with this one spoiler, we aren't starting off last in the Big Ten.  (insert Arrested Development "Don't Buy Bluth" clip here).  Stay tuned folks and hold on to your shorts.  A quick scan of the upcoming schedule is enough to give me heartburn.

 

For now, enjoy a little relaxing music.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming they end up playing Siena and Seton Hall: 

 

  12  @Indiana
  22  @Creighton
  23  Iowa
  23  @Iowa
  25  Purdue
  25  @Purdue
  26  @Michigan
  28  n Oklahoma
  31  @Michigan State
  31  Michigan State
  32  Ohio State
  33  Illinois
  33  @Illinois
  37  @St. John's
  46  @Penn State
  46  Penn State
  48  n Seton Hall
  50  @Rutgers
  55  Wisconsin
  56  @Maryland
  56  Maryland
  70  Northwestern
  74  Boston College
  77  @Kansas State
109  @Minnesota
109  Minnesota
227  Queens University
244  n Siena
330  Omaha
351  Maine
361  Arkansas-Pine Bluff
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KenPom's algos don't take into account the change in defensive philosophy we're expecting. A true commitment to defense, with the talent on this roster, is going to result in an AdjD better than the 107th predicted here. I won't argue with the KenPom offensive rating of 115 based on the current talent, except to say an improved defense might lead to more easier baskets.

 

Not saying we're suddenly a top 25 team, just that we can be better than 108th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a lot to say this morning. We've been down this road before and kinda already know where it goes so for now the less said the better. So in the interest of brevity...Here we go with the first edition of the KenPom rankings 2022-23!

 


 

KenPom rankings as of 10-17-22
=======================

 

B1G (0-0):
12. Indiana
23. Iowa
25. Purdue
26. Michigan
31. Michigan State
32. Ohio State
33. Illinois
46. Penn State
50. Rutgers
55. Wisconsin
56. Maryland
70. Northwestern
108. Nebraska
109. Minnesota

 

 

Non-Conference (0-0):
351. Maine
330. Omaha

---Gavitt Games---
37. @St. John's

361. Arkansas Pine-Bluff

---ESPN Events Invitational---
28. Oklahoma
34/48. Memphis/Seton Hall
49/58/65/244. Ole Miss/Stanford/Florida State/Siena

---B1G/ACC Challenge---
74. Boston College

22. @Creighton
77. Kansas State

---Battle In The Vault---
227. Queens University of Charlotte

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a look at the schedule with projected win totals:

 

2023 Schedule 

Game Plan | Opponent Tracker

Date Rk Opponent Result     Location Record Conf  
Mon Nov 7   351 Maine W, 84-61 74 98% Home      
Thu Nov 10   330 Nebraska Omaha W, 85-67 75 95% Home      
Thu Nov 17   37 St. John's L, 83-71 78 15% Away      
Sun Nov 20   361 Arkansas Pine Bluff W, 89-62 74 99% Home      
Thu Nov 24   28 Oklahoma L, 77-67 73 20% Neutral      
Wed Nov 30   74 Boston College L, 73-72 73 49% Home      
Sun Dec 4   22 Creighton L, 81-68 75 12% Away      
Wed Dec 7   12 Indiana L, 81-65 74 8% Away   ×  
Sat Dec 10   25 Purdue L, 78-72 73 29% Home   ×  
Sat Dec 17   77 Kansas St. L, 76-70 74 27% Away      
Tue Dec 20   227 Queens W, 84-72 75 86% Home      
Thu Dec 29   23 Iowa L, 82-75 76 27% Home   ×  
Tue Jan 3   31 Michigan St. L, 81-69 75 14% Away   ×  
Sat Jan 7   109 Minnesota L, 75-72 73 39% Away   ×  
Tue Jan 10   33 Illinois L, 76-71 75 32% Home   ×  
Fri Jan 13   25 Purdue L, 81-68 73 12% Away   ×  
Wed Jan 18   32 Ohio St. L, 77-71 73 32% Home   ×  
Sat Jan 21   46 Penn St. L, 77-67 71 19% Away   ×  
Tue Jan 24   70 Northwestern L, 73-72 74 47% Home   ×  
Sat Jan 28   56 Maryland L, 79-70 75 20% Away   ×  
Tue Jan 31   33 Illinois L, 80-68 75 14% Away   ×  
Sun Feb 5   46 Penn St. L, 73-70 71 38% Home   ×  
Wed Feb 8   26 Michigan L, 82-69 74 12% Away   ×  
Sat Feb 11   55 Wisconsin L, 74-71 73 40% Home   ×  
Tue Feb 14   50 Rutgers L, 75-66 73 19% Away   ×  
Sun Feb 19   56 Maryland L, 75-73 75 41% Home   ×  
Sat Feb 25   109 Minnesota W, 75-72 73 62% Home   ×  
Tue Feb 28   31 Michigan St. L, 78-72 75 31% Home   ×  
Sun Mar 5   23 Iowa L, 85-72 76 12% Away   ×  
Projected record: 10-19 5-15  
Chance of unbeaten record: 0.00% 0.00%  
Chance of winless record: 0.00% 0.1%

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is Torvik, if you are into that sort of thing:

 

 

2023 T-Rank College Basketball Projections

RK TEAM CONF ADJOE ADJDE BARTHAG PROJ. REC RET MINS RPMS TALENT EXP. TRANS.
11 Indiana B10 111.1
23
91.7
12
.9004 22-9 13-7 78.1% 81.6% 79.8 2.16 0
15 Illinois B10 112.1
14
93.5
31
.8897 22-8 13-7 16.5% 15.0% 82.8 1.41 181
24 Michigan St. B10 111.7
19
94.6
47
.8714 18-11 12-8 54.1% 55.2% 73 1.86 0
31 Iowa B10 113.1
8
96.6
78
.8590 20-10 12-8 62.0% 56.8% 52.2 1.94 0
32 Purdue B10 112.6
10
96.2
71
.8589 19-10 12-8 39.5% 35.9% 57.4 1.54 36
38 Michigan B10 111.4
21
95.9
65
.8481 19-11 11-9 27.5% 30.5% 87.9 1.57 99
50 Maryland B10 108.9
44
95.6
60
.8167 18-12 11-9 46.8% 42.5% 50.7 2.38 154
56 Rutgers B10 104.8
118
92.8
22
.8022 19-12 10-10 63.5% 59.7% 47.3 2.34 41
62 Wisconsin B10 104.4
124
93.1
25
.7896 16-13 10-10 52.3% 45.0% 48.5 1.64 73
67 Ohio St. B10 109.3
41
98.4
109
.7686 15-14 9-11 23.0% 15.0% 54.6 2.15 185
82 Penn St. B10 104.8
119
96.0
67
.7324 15-14 8-12 55.2% 52.2% 34.5 2.34 138
92 Nebraska B10 106.3
84
98.7
114
.7016 13-16 7-13 38.2% 28.8% 32.8 2.27 223
98 Northwestern B10 102.2
178
95.3
55
.6921 14-16 7-13 59.6% 57.2% 48.6 2.2 23
134 Minnesota B10 104.6
121
100.7
154
.6071 13-17 5-15 20.9% 23.6% 37.2 2.07 208

Compiled by Bart Torvik from sacred data and secret formulas.

 

 

 

DATE   OPPONENT RESULT/LINE RECORD WAB                                   -
Mon 11-07 H   313 (Ⅳ)   Maine -18.4, 88-69 94%     .04                                    
Thu 11-10 H   336 (Ⅳ)   Nebraska Omaha -21.2, 90-69 96%     .03                                    
Thu 11-17 A   47 (Ⅳ)   St. John's +9.0, 86-77 22%     .56                                    
Sun 11-20 H   344 (Ⅳ)   Arkansas Pine Bluff -22.8, 91-68 97%     .02                                    
Thu 11-24 N   33 (Ⅳ)   Oklahoma +6.1, 78-72 28%     .55                                    
Wed 11-30 H   76 (Ⅲ)   Boston College -2.4, 76-73 59%     .31                                    
Sun 12-04 A   23 (Ⅱ)   Creighton +10.8, 80-69 16%     .66                                    
Wed 12-07 A   11 (I-A) Indiana +12.9, 83-70 13%     .72                                    
Sat 12-10 H   32 (Ⅱ) Purdue +2.4, 78-75 41%     .48                                    
Sat 12-17 N   45 (I)   Kansas St. +4.9, 79-74 33%     .50                                    
Tue 12-20 H   236 (Ⅳ)   Queens -14.0, 88-74 88%     .08                                    
Thu 12-29 H   31 (Ⅱ) Iowa +2.5, 82-79 41%     .48                                    
Tue 1-03 A   24 (I-A) Michigan St. +11.1, 83-72 16%     .65                                    
Sat 1-07 A   134 (I-A) Minnesota +1.2, 77-76 46%     .30                                    
Tue 1-10 H   15 (I-A) Illinois +4.2, 78-74 35%     .55                                    
Fri 1-13 A   32 (I-A) Purdue +10.3, 82-72 18%     .63                                    
Wed 1-18 H   67 (Ⅱ) Ohio St. -1.7, 76-75 56%     .34                                    
Sat 1-21 A   82 (I) Penn St. +4.8, 76-71 32%     .43                                    
Tue 1-24 H   98 (Ⅲ) Northwestern -4.2, 76-72 66%     .26                                    
Sat 1-28 A   50 (Ⅱ) Maryland +8.3, 81-73 22%     .55                                    
Tue 1-31 A   15 (I) Illinois +12.2, 83-70 14%     .69                                    
Sun 2-05 H   82 (Ⅲ) Penn St. -2.9, 75-72 61%     .29                                    
Wed 2-08 A   38 (Ⅱ) Michigan +9.7, 81-72 19%     .61                                    
Sat 2-11 H   62 (Ⅱ) Wisconsin -0.8, 73-72 53%     .36                                    
Tue 2-14 A   56 (I) Rutgers +7.1, 75-68 24%     .53                                    
Sun 2-19 H   50 (Ⅱ) Maryland +0.3, 78-77 49%     .40                                    
Sat 2-25 H   134 (Ⅲ) Minnesota -6.8, 80-73 73%     .19                                    
Tue 2-28 H   24 (I) Michigan St. +3.1, 79-76 39%     .51                                    
Sun 3-05 A   31 (I-A) Iowa +10.9, 86-75 18%     .63                                    
Projected Record: 13-16 (7-13)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, hskr4life said:

Now I know the odds are low… but if we have a 0.1% chance of going winless, I feel we should also have a 0.1% chance of going undefeated.  I mean there’s always a chance until you win/lose your first game.

 

Those are the conference only numbers.  The overall percentages are 0.0% undefeated and 0.0% winless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, jimmykc said:

So KenPom thinks we will go for two months without a victory. I'll take the over for that stretch (which includes Minnesota, Northwestern and Penn State twice).

That's not how odds work :)

 

KenPom thinks we are underdogs in every game for two months straight, which is not the same as expecting zero wins over that two-month stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm struggling here.

 

Objectively, you look at our roster and our history and we have no world beaters on this team and I think they should be picking us no higher than 150 or so.

 

And I think to myself, yeah, objectively, that's where you'd think we should be. AND I think we'll be better than that.

 

But then they pick us at 108, and Torvik at 92 for goodness sake, and I'm thinking man they're acting like a bunch of Husker homers. Drinking the red Kool-Aid.

 

I mean, that's kinda the ballpark where I think we'll be. But I'm assuming I've got a lot of red-color-glasses influence there. Of course I would think we'll be better than the 150ish that we should have been picked at.

 

The thing I'm struggling with is why the hell do they think we'll be as good as I think we'll be? That almost never happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 49r said:

The thing is I think that if we had Tim as coach with this roster, we're looking at a 60-70ish team.  With Hoiberg, it wouldn't surprise me to see us dip into the 130's.

 

Same.

 

I have some hope that off-season personnel moves have made a big difference.

 

Taking a decidedly wait-and-see approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Kenpom thing. It's not based on gut feeling or personal opinion, right? It's like somebody objectively crunching numbers and coming up with a system that weighs the stats that his research into those stats indicate matter. Right?

 

For no particular reason, can anyone like @49r look up historically where the North Texas Mean Green has been ranked in Kenpom over the last 5-6 years?

 

Just curious. Apropos of nothing in particular. Except Kenpom, obviously. Since this is a Kenpom thread and I want to keep things topical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Norm Peterson said:

This Kenpom thing. It's not based on gut feeling or personal opinion, right? It's like somebody objectively crunching numbers and coming up with a system that weighs the stats that his research into those stats indicate matter. Right?

 

For no particular reason, can anyone like @49r look up historically where the North Texas Mean Green has been ranked in Kenpom over the last 5-6 years?

 

Just curious. Apropos of nothing in particular. Except Kenpom, obviously. Since this is a Kenpom thread and I want to keep things topical.

 

OK, I did my own digging on Kenpom's end-of-year standings.

 

2017 -- 320th

2018 -- 146th

2019 -- 158th

2020 -- 77th

2021 -- 72nd

2022 -- 57th

2023 -- projected 67th

 

Wow. That's pretty consistent improvement over the years for the Mean Green. Interestingly, their current coach took over, well, the year AFTER they went 8-22 and finished 320th in the Kenpom rankings. So, his first season, they jumped from 320th to 146th. Their coach's name is Grant McCasland, in case anyone is interested. That's kind of neither-here-nor-there. The discussion is about Kenpom rankings. And, as an aside, I guess I would just say it would be cool if he could accomplish the same kind of trajectory at a bigger school in a major conference, like Nebraska for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another pretty good one IMO @Norm Peterson

 

Coaching Résumé for Jeff Linder 

    Offense Defense  
  Team Conf W-L AdjT AdjO AdjD eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P% 3P% FT% 3PA% A% APL eFG% TO% OR% FTR 2P% 3P% Blk% 3PA% A% APL 2FP%
2023 64 Wyoming MWC 0-0
0-0
71.0
239
107.0
48
94.7
88
0.0
1
100.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
200.0
1
0.0
1
100.0
1
200.0
1
100.0
1
100.0
1
0.0
1
100.0
1
100.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
2022 65 Wyoming 12 R0 MWC 25-9
13-5
66.1
239
109.1
67
97.2
71
52.3
72
17.0
87
25.5
267
37.1
33
54.4
31
32.9
222
72.3
153
41.8
89
43.4
326
18.7
295
47.1
51
15.7
319
24.6
48
24.8
43
48.4
124
30.1
26
5.6
333
38.2
204
42.2
23
17.6
184
11.0
269
2021 164 Wyoming MWC 14-11
7-9
69.0
129
109.1
68
109.0
301
53.7
42
16.0
31
22.9
304
35.3
75
53.9
38
35.7
78
71.9
141
48.8
9
54.1
107
17.4
188
52.9
287
18.2
208
27.8
166
33.9
236
54.4
313
33.0
128
5.4
325
31.1
18
45.5
50
16.8
79
37.2
57
2020 75 Northern Colorado BSky 22-9
15-5
65.0
320
110.2
45
100.1
122
54.7
12
15.4
14
25.0
274
25.3
332
53.6
30
37.4
18
67.3
293
45.1
28
48.5
249
19.0
334
48.5
126
16.8
296
24.0
28
24.9
26
50.2
210
28.5
6
5.5
329
23.5
1
33.3
1
17.6
225
19.8
186
2019 193 Northern Colorado BSky 21-11
15-5
66.5
236
102.6
206
104.9
178
52.9
78
18.4
164
27.8
198
34.8
122
53.5
50
34.8
148
69.8
201
45.4
35
50.1
240
18.2
262
51.4
203
18.6
157
25.8
68
28.1
54
49.6
147
36.8
299
8.0
229
31.2
8
45.0
35
17.3
124
26.6
120
2018 104 Northern Colorado BSky 26-12
11-7
72.2
24
107.3
129
100.8
94
53.8
65
16.8
69
25.4
282
33.8
163
54.1
40
35.5
136
69.2
265
39.6
113
40.4
344
16.4
65
48.8
67
17.4
240
24.4
25
36.8
252
48.7
124
32.9
50
8.0
236
24.2
1
37.6
1
16.6
43
9.3
268
2017 283 Northern Colorado BSky 11-18
7-11
68.5
160
96.6
309
106.9
216
51.0
155
20.3
293
27.4
235
34.5
201
50.9
104
34.1
215
59.4
351
44.1
25
52.8
158
17.4
186
52.2
242
18.2
198
25.4
32
34.5
163
52.0
269
35.0
171
6.1
314
37.4
217
47.6
56
16.4
25
19.5
151
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Linder seems like a decent coach for a team at the Power 5 level who may or may not have an opening at the end of this season to take a look at.

 

FWIW, here's Wyoming's finishes in the years before Linder took over:

 

#317 in 2019

#246 in 2020

 

Then Linder took over in the Covid season and played only 7 non-con games.

Edited by 49r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...