jayschool Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 A quick stat check as we end the first month of the season and move on to sterner challenges (though every game is a challenge with this bunch). There are 350 teams in NCAA Division I. FG Percentage Offense — 45.2 percent (129th in Division I) 3-point FG Percentage Offense — 34.2 percent (143rd) FT Percentage — 57.6 percent (344th) Rebound Differential — minus-13.5 (349th) Take THAT, Mississippi Valley State! FG Percentage Defense — 41.3 percent (158th) 3-point FG Percentage Defense — 29.9 percent (104th) Assist-Turnover Ratio — plus-1.14 (100th) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Don Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 I could have gone All Day without seeing this! jayschool 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hskr4life Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 Interesting considering that Fred’s specializes in offense. However, I’d be interested to see how these numbers have evolved from game 1 to now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuroranHusker Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 23 minutes ago, hskr4life said: Interesting considering that Fred’s specializes in offense. However, I’d be interested to see how these numbers have evolved from game 1 to now. After two games, NU was shooting in the mid-30s as far as field goal shooting, which had to be in the bottom 10 in the country. So, hey, at least that figure has bumped up to 45% !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Handy Johnson Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 Looks like we’re in the “meaty” part of the curve on most of these. That FT percentage though would make Lonzo Ball blush... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuroranHusker Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, Handy Johnson said: Looks like we’re in the “meaty” part of the curve on most of these. That FT percentage though would make Lonzo Ball blush... Both FT% and that rebounding deficit are less than ideal. Handy Johnson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huskerpapa Posted November 28, 2019 Report Share Posted November 28, 2019 Ughhh...the good news is that, realistically, we have nowhere to go but up ---- right? FT Percentage — 57.6 percent (344th) Rebound Differential — minus-13.5 (349th) Take THAT, Mississippi Valley State! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Peterson Posted November 29, 2019 Report Share Posted November 29, 2019 It's like the first PT test when you go to basic. Set the bar low so you can show lots of improvement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Dog Alley Posted November 29, 2019 Report Share Posted November 29, 2019 3 hours ago, Huskerpapa said: Ughhh...the good news is that, realistically, we have nowhere to go but up ---- right? FT Percentage — 57.6 percent (344th) Rebound Differential — minus-13.5 (349th) Take THAT, Mississippi Valley State! Mississippi Valley State will get through their payday games and start playing SWAC opponents so their margin might get better. Nebraska will start playing conference games in the most physical league in the country. So.... HolyBobpilgrimage, Mr. Red and Norm Peterson 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuroranHusker Posted November 29, 2019 Report Share Posted November 29, 2019 4 hours ago, Dead Dog Alley said: Mississippi Valley State will get through their payday games and start playing SWAC opponents so their margin might get better. Nebraska will start playing conference games in the most physical league in the country. So.... Yikes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hhcmatt Posted November 29, 2019 Report Share Posted November 29, 2019 23 hours ago, jayschool said: There are 350 teams in NCAA Division I. 353 jayschool 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuroranHusker Posted November 30, 2019 Report Share Posted November 30, 2019 7 hours ago, hhcmatt said: 353 So NU is "bottom 10" and "bottom 5" in the Huskers' two less-than-ideal categories of FT% and rebounding differential, respectively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcp Posted November 30, 2019 Report Share Posted November 30, 2019 On 11/28/2019 at 7:20 PM, Norm Peterson said: It's like the first PT test when you go to basic. Set the bar low so you can show lots of improvement. except get put on a diet and no more cherry cobbler for you. I live for that stuff in basic. If I had a sign made, it would read, "will run 2 mile in under 13 for desert". Norm Peterson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayschool Posted November 30, 2019 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2019 22 hours ago, hhcmatt said: 353 Not doubting, but the NCAA team stats pages list only 350 in each category. For example, in FT percentage, you see this on page 7, where each page lists 50 teams. There is not page 8. And that's true of every stat. Who's worse than St. Louis in FT percentage? I don't know. Either nobody or three other teams. It's hard to imagine worse than 51 percent, but ... So to understand my stats post (out of 350), it's of the 350 listed. I don't know where we rank if you add in the other three teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
49r Posted November 30, 2019 Report Share Posted November 30, 2019 Ken Pomeroy includes all of the teams: Scouting Report Data through games of Friday, November 29 Category Offense Defense D-I Avg Adj. Efficiency 101.0 140 99.6 157 99.6 Adj. Tempo 72.6 65 69.7 Avg. Poss. Length 15.2 23 18.4 321 17.2 Four Factors Effective FG%: 51.8 93 46.6 115 49.1 Turnover %: 15.7 25 19.7 166 19.7 Off. Reb. %: 19.2 342 37.6 347 28.2 FTA/FGA: 39.3 63 19.1 8 31.8 Miscellaneous Components 3P%: 34.2 130 29.9 92 33.0 2P%: 52.1 88 47.6 148 48.9 FT%: 57.6 346 72.3 246 69.6 Block%: 11.2 280 8.3 184 9.0 Steal%: 8.0 88 7.8 252 9.2 Non-Stl TO%: 7.8 33 11.9 94 10.5 Style Components 3PA/FGA: 38.3 154 36.0 130 37.5 A/FGM: 50.0 194 41.4 39 51.3 Point Distribution (% of total points) 3-Pointers: 31.1 169 30.2 192 30.9 2-Pointers: 50.9 174 56.9 50 50.7 Free Throws: 17.9 195 12.9 330 18.4 Strength of Schedule Components: 95.9 322 101.0 255 99.6 Overall: -5.16 301 0.00 Non-conference: -5.16 298 0.00 Personnel Bench Minutes: 30.3% 178 30.4% Experience: 1.53 yrs 231 1.68 Minutes Continuity: 4.1% 352 46.7% Average Height: 77.1" 140 76.9" 2-Foul Participation: 43.4% 36 21.1% HolyBobpilgrimage and jayschool 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.