Texas is "in"

[89Husker]

at 15-13.  7-8 in conference.  Their Quad 1/Quad 2 record is 6-13.

 

It is crazy how close we really are even with the awful last 6 weeks....

[AuroranHusker]

Indiana, for cripe's sake, thinks they are on the cusp of dancin' after a 2-OT win over Wisc. And they're 5-12 and 14-14... not a lot different than Nebraska's 5-12 and 15-13. NU might need to get a few more dubs. You never know if something crazy could occur. Indiana has only won 2 times since Jan.3rd... not unlike the Huskers. Weird, weird year.

 

 

[Handy Johnson]

Well it’s game day here in Husker land that means it’s time to get excited, circle the wagons, rally the troops and get ready for.... Spring Football! Evidently after back to back resounding 4-8 seasons “Old Nebraska Football” is back! Whew... I’ll rest easy when my head hits the pillow tonight.

[HuskerFever]

This is why Texas is in the field and we're left with a lot more work to do:

 

NU/Texas/Indiana

NET: 45 / 37 / 55

Avg opp NET: 87 / 79 / 89

Avg opp rank: 13 / 7 / 16

SOS: 82 / 10 / 37

NC SOS: 199 / 16 / 189

 

KPI: 68 / 33 / 60

SOR: 61 / 55 / 54

BPI: 34 / 29 / 48

POM: 42 / 27 / 48

SAG: 39 / 29 / 43

 

Q1: 2-10 / 4-7 / 5-9

Q2: 5-3 / 4-3 / 1-5

Q3: 3-0 / 4-2 / 2-0

Q4: 4-0 / 3-0 / 6-0

Q1+Q2: 7-13 / 8-10 / 6-14

[The Polish Rifle]

What a wasted opportunity this season was. We could of finished under .500 in conf and been comfortably in. To think if we didn't completely crumble in conf we would all be discussing what type of 1st round matchup.

[89Husker]

1 hour ago, HuskerFever said:

This is why Texas is in the field and we're left with a lot more work to do:

 

NU/Texas/Indiana

NET: 45 / 37 / 55

Avg opp NET: 87 / 79 / 89

Avg opp rank: 13 / 7 / 16

SOS: 82 / 10 / 37

NC SOS: 199 / 16 / 189

 

KPI: 68 / 33 / 60

SOR: 61 / 55 / 54

BPI: 34 / 29 / 48

POM: 42 / 27 / 48

SAG: 39 / 29 / 43

 

Q1: 2-10 / 4-7 / 5-9

Q2: 5-3 / 4-3 / 1-5

Q3: 3-0 / 4-2 / 2-0

Q4: 4-0 / 3-0 / 6-0

Q1+Q2: 7-13 / 8-10 / 6-14

thanks for the details here.  a week ago we had 8 Quad 1/Quad 2 wins - goes to show how quick things can change.

 

If you put this together yourself, thank you, but if you grabbed this summary info from a website, would you share which site that is??

[HuskerFever]

15 minutes ago, 89Husker said:

thanks for the details here.  a week ago we had 8 Quad 1/Quad 2 wins - goes to show how quick things can change.

 

If you put this together yourself, thank you, but if you grabbed this summary info from a website, would you share which site that is??

 

You can mash the data together from here: https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-men/d1/ncaa-mens-basketball-net-rankings

 

They also include a link at the bottom of the NET rankings that has the latest team sheets for every DI team.

[hskr4life]

2 hours ago, HuskerFever said:

This is why Texas is in the field and we're left with a lot more work to do:

 

NU/Texas/Indiana

NET: 45 / 37 / 55

Avg opp NET: 87 / 79 / 89

Avg opp rank: 13 / 7 / 16

SOS: 82 / 10 / 37

NC SOS: 199 / 16 / 189

 

KPI: 68 / 33 / 60

SOR: 61 / 55 / 54

BPI: 34 / 29 / 48

POM: 42 / 27 / 48

SAG: 39 / 29 / 43

 

Q1: 2-10 / 4-7 / 5-9

Q2: 5-3 / 4-3 / 1-5

Q3: 3-0 / 4-2 / 2-0

Q4: 4-0 / 3-0 / 6-0

Q1+Q2: 7-13 / 8-10 / 6-14

 

Oohh how close we really are though.  My goodness.  We’re sooo close right now.  The reason I think no one gives us a chance right now....

 

We finish MU, MSU, Iowa.  What wasted opportunities against Rutgers, OSU, Illinois, and Wisco.

Edited February 28, 2019 by hskr4life

[AuroranHusker]

4 hours ago, HuskerFever said:

This is why Texas is in the field and we're left with a lot more work to do:

 

NU/Texas/Indiana

NET: 45 / 37 / 55

Avg opp NET: 87 / 79 / 89

Avg opp rank: 13 / 7 / 16

SOS: 82 / 10 / 37

NC SOS: 199 / 16 / 189

 

KPI: 68 / 33 / 60

SOR: 61 / 55 / 54

BPI: 34 / 29 / 48

POM: 42 / 27 / 48

SAG: 39 / 29 / 43

 

Q1: 2-10 / 4-7 / 5-9

Q2: 5-3 / 4-3 / 1-5

Q3: 3-0 / 4-2 / 2-0

Q4: 4-0 / 3-0 / 6-0

Q1+Q2: 7-13 / 8-10 / 6-14

 

Thanks for the research put together here, HF. Perspective helps when one sorts it out in numbers.

 

 

[AuroranHusker]

3 hours ago, The Polish Rifle said:

What a wasted opportunity this season was. We could of finished under .500 in conf and been comfortably in. To think if we didn't completely crumble in conf we would all be discussing what type of 1st round matchup.

 

Three (really, more than that) opportunities to make 'hay'! You never know.... stranger things have occurred. Just watch how Iowa beat Rutgers, for instance. And Iowa beating Northwestern late when all hope seemed lost for Fran's fellas.

 

 

[brfrad]

This team makes me angrier about last year (according to bracket matrix, they are a 5 seed).  They have yet to PLAY a tier 1 game until this Saturday.  Yet, they get a 5 seed, and we barely make the NIT last year.  

 

BTW it is Nevada.

Edited March 1, 2019 by brfrad

[jason2486]

10 minutes ago, brfrad said:

This team makes me angrier about last year (according to bracket matrix, they are a 5 seed).  They have yet to PLAY a tier 1 game until this Saturday.  Yet, they get a 5 seed, and we barely make the NIT last year.  

 

BTW it is Nevada.

 

Yep, we got royally F'd last year. Sweet 16 at least IMO.

[nebrasketball10]

13 hours ago, HuskerFever said:

This is why Texas is in the field and we're left with a lot more work to do:

 

NU/Texas/Indiana

NET: 45 / 37 / 55

Avg opp NET: 87 / 79 / 89

Avg opp rank: 13 / 7 / 16

SOS: 82 / 10 / 37

NC SOS: 199 / 16 / 189

 

KPI: 68 / 33 / 60

SOR: 61 / 55 / 54

BPI: 34 / 29 / 48

POM: 42 / 27 / 48

SAG: 39 / 29 / 43

 

Q1: 2-10 / 4-7 / 5-9

Q2: 5-3 / 4-3 / 1-5

Q3: 3-0 / 4-2 / 2-0

Q4: 4-0 / 3-0 / 6-0

Q1+Q2: 7-13 / 8-10 / 6-14

 

Our NCSOS is199??

[HuskerFever]

4 minutes ago, nebrasketball10 said:

 

Our NCSOS is199??

 

Unfortunately, yes. The quality teams we beat in nonconference aren't doing their part to want to be in the tournament. Some are hanging by a thread.

[HuskerFever]

(Before the Michigan game)

 

NU/Minnesota

NET: 45 / 60

Avg opp NET: 87 / 93

Avg opp rank: 13 / 24

SOS: 82 / 45

NC SOS: 199 / 153

 

KPI: 68 / 46

SOR: 61 / 41

BPI: 34 / 60

POM: 42 / 49

SAG: 39 / 52

 

Q1: 2-10 / 2-8

Q2: 5-3 / 6-3

Q3: 3-0 / 4-0

Q4: 4-0 / 5-0

Q1+Q2: 7-13 / 8-11

[khoock]

Not to derail this. But id much rather see teams like Murray State, Wofford, Belmont, and/or San Francisco get at large bids them near .500 clubs like Butler and Texas.

 

Also when it comes to us, completely disregard our resume bc the eye test tells you Nebraska is a very very bad team rn.

 

 

[brfrad]

15 minutes ago, khoock said:

Not to derail this. But id much rather see teams like Murray State, Wofford, Belmont, and/or San Francisco get at large bids them near .500 clubs like Butler and Texas.

 

Also when it comes to us, completely disregard our resume bc the eye test tells you Nebraska is a very very bad team rn.

 

 

Except last year we weren't allowed to look at the eye test.  It was all about the numbers.  That's what makes last year so frustrating. 

[hskr4life]

Can we officially call the PAC 12 a 1 bid league finally?  My goodness that leaguebis terrible.

[khoock]

12 minutes ago, brfrad said:

Except last year we weren't allowed to look at the eye test.  It was all about the numbers.  That's what makes last year so frustrating. 

Agreed. I think we should have gotten in last year.

[HuskerFever]

10 minutes ago, hskr4life said:

Can we officially call the PAC 12 a 1 bid league finally?  My goodness that leaguebis terrible.

 

You mean permanently, right? Or at least a 5-year ban... 

 

NET Rankings (Pac-12 vs. Big East)

29: Washington / 21: Marquette

63: Arizona State / 27: Villanova

74: Oregon / 49: St. John's

75: Colorado / 54: Butler

80: Arizona / 56: Creighton

81: Oregon State / 65: Seton Hall

86: USC / 71: Georgetown

100: Utah / 77: Providence

102: Stanford / 83: Xavier

109: UCLA / 110: DePaul

173: Washington State

275: California