Jump to content

Last 7 Games


cjbowbros

Last 7 Games  

70 members have voted

  1. 1. Seems like everyone thought the season could be over if we didn't win tonight and didn't like what they had seen the first few games. After tonight how would you describe your feeling towards the team's performance so far?

    • Not satisfied
    • Satisfied
    • Very satisfied
    • Unfathomably satisfied


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, noahjb24 said:

I can easily see us 12-1 heading into January

 

According to Pomeroy, there is a chance that happens:

 

Date Rk Opponent Result     Location Record Conf  
Tue Nov 6 38 346 Mississippi Valley St. W, 106-37 78   Home 1-0    
Sun Nov 11 35 296 Southeastern Louisiana W, 87-35 74   Home 2-0    
Wed Nov 14 33 54 Seton Hall W, 80-57 70   Home 3-0    
Mon Nov 19 29 187 Missouri St. W, 85-62 70   Neutral 4-0    
Tue Nov 20 23 11 Texas Tech L, 70-52 66   Neutral 4-1   a.gif
Sat Nov 24 32 238 Western Illinois W, 73-49 70   Home 5-1    
Mon Nov 26 31 29 Clemson W, 68-66 60   Away 6-1   a.gif
Sun Dec 2   95 Illinois W, 78-67 70 84% Home   ×  
Wed Dec 5   50 Minnesota W, 71-70 69 52% Away   × a.gif
Sat Dec 8   34 Creighton W, 75-71 70 67% Home     b.gif
Sun Dec 16   53 Oklahoma St. W, 72-68 69 64% Neutral     b.gif
Sat Dec 22   146 Cal St. Fullerton W, 78-63 70 91% Home      
Sat Dec 29   NR SW Minnesota St. W   100% Home    

 

But it's probably just a tad under 20% that it does happen.  However, I'm sure @HuskerActuary will (and should) correct my math on that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bugeaters1 said:

You can see who voted not satisfied. Just don't think that they will live up to the hype. I'm looking at the big picture here.

 

 

Interesting.  What through the first 7 games made you feel that way?  I mean we’ve laid one egg at a neutral site against a pretty good Tech team.  We also followed that up by winning a road game at Clemson.

 

6-1, beat 2/3 power conference teams we’ve played,  No close games against crap teams... just wondering what makes you think we can’t do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 49r said:

 

According to Pomeroy, there is a chance that happens:

 

Date Rk Opponent Result     Location Record Conf  
Tue Nov 6 38 346 Mississippi Valley St. W, 106-37 78   Home 1-0    
Sun Nov 11 35 296 Southeastern Louisiana W, 87-35 74   Home 2-0    
Wed Nov 14 33 54 Seton Hall W, 80-57 70   Home 3-0    
Mon Nov 19 29 187 Missouri St. W, 85-62 70   Neutral 4-0    
Tue Nov 20 23 11 Texas Tech L, 70-52 66   Neutral 4-1   a.gif
Sat Nov 24 32 238 Western Illinois W, 73-49 70   Home 5-1    
Mon Nov 26 31 29 Clemson W, 68-66 60   Away 6-1   a.gif
Sun Dec 2   95 Illinois W, 78-67 70 84% Home   ×  
Wed Dec 5   50 Minnesota W, 71-70 69 52% Away   × a.gif
Sat Dec 8   34 Creighton W, 75-71 70 67% Home     b.gif
Sun Dec 16   53 Oklahoma St. W, 72-68 69 64% Neutral     b.gif
Sat Dec 22   146 Cal St. Fullerton W, 78-63 70 91% Home      
Sat Dec 29   NR SW Minnesota St. W   100% Home    

 

But it's probably just a tad under 20% that it does happen.  However, I'm sure @HuskerActuary will (and should) correct my math on that.

 

 

Your math looks good ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, hhcdave said:

Since I was quoted in this post, let’s make this clear. I NEVER said tonight was must win and the season was over. 

 

I assumed this a loss and said if so, we HAD to beat Creighton and OSU. Which was true. I don’t think any rational person would disagree. 

Again I probably shouldn't have used that wording in the question. My bad.

But anyway I would disagree that we needed to beat Creighton and OSU if we lost this game. If you are saying to simply make the tournament which you could have a different goal in mind and that's fair. But if we beat OSU fall to Creighton and win every other game until the new year we would be 10-3 and 3-3 or 2-3 (depending on Seton Hall) against Q1 or Q2 opponents with 18 games left against solid opponents. We only had 3 Q1 or Q2 wins all season last year. If we just go 11-9  overall in conference we get 3 more Q1-2 wins easy and maybe that's enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, cjbowbros said:

Let me throw another one at you in my pre-season predictions I said that Copeland would be the most improved player after not being injured for an offseason. Through 7 games would you say that's been true so far this season?

He is in the running.  I also think Nana, Tanner and Glynn have all elevated their games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...