Jump to content

big red22

Members
  • Content count

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About big red22

  • Rank
    Junior

Recent Profile Visitors

348 profile views
  1. Go on record now.

    Morrow > Okeke Okeke > Jacobson Copeland > Morrow Copeland > Jacobson Palmer > Horne Palmer > Fuller Fun being the 1st Vote I went "If this was a trade, this would have been a really good trade on our end: gave up a little; got a LOT!"
  2. Next Years Starting 5

    Bingo!
  3. Next Years Starting 5

    So basically your saying players like Steph Curry, Kevin Durant, Dwayne Wade all were glue guys at their school? Glue guys are never the most gifted athletes, and you are pulling that out of your ***
  4. Next Years Starting 5

    Roby is 6'8 and can play point if needed, do I need to say more? He excels at all aspects of basketball. The only aspect of his game that needs work is his 3 point shooting. Which is something that can increase with a little practice. His form is correct as well. So to call a player that has traits less than 1% of the basketball population has a glue guy is completely ill informed. Mr. Padilla you know what a glue guy is right? A glue guy is a player like Grant Gibbs, I'm sure you've heard of him. Nebraska glue guys are players like Mike Peltz, Benny Parker and yes Evan Taylor. A glue guy is a player that lacks basketball athleticism but plays with energy and knowledge. Does that sound like Roby to you? The basis of the glue guy argument is on his 3pt shot percentage as a true freshman? Really? He is in the top 3 on our team in the following categories and he is a Sophomore Court Vision/Passing Athleticism Blocking Finishing at the Rim If I had to pick 4 players that I could keep on this team it would be Roby, Watson, Tshimanga and Copeland. I would never classify Roby as a glue guy, when he is one of the few players that actually has an NBA skill set on our team. It is an asinine comment, and was ill informed statement that needed to be called out for what it was
  5. Next Years Starting 5

    I see this is your 1st post, please stop posting any further! Roby is not a Glue guy and you are completely clueless by stating that.
  6. Next Years Starting 5

    I think this is close, but Roby will be the starting 3 or 4. Gill will get some of Palmer's and Allen's minutes, Starter - Roby 25 min (Added 3 of Allen's minutes) Rotation - Palmer 20 min (Gave 5 minutes to Gill) - Allen 10 min (Gave 5 minutes to Gill and 3 minutes to Roby) - Gill 10 min (5 of Palmer's minutes and 5 of Allen's minutes
  7. Developing story: NCAA fraud and corruption probe

    I was joking. Sorry my sarcasm is a bit off these days
  8. OT: What would you guys name this band?

    The Please Come Back Band with hits songs "Where did the common sense go?" and "It could be worse!"
  9. Big 10 Talent

    Look no one is disputing that there is a lot of grey area with our team, but "as far as talent goes a lot of schools wanted the players we have and that says something" I am not going to go very deep here, because I am just wasting my breath. There are poor starts for a LOT of Top guys, for a LOT of Top teams. It happens everywhere man! Here are some examples Kieta Bates-Diop = Top 50 (3pts) Kieta Bates-Diop Stats Charles Matthews = Top 50 (3pts) Charles Matthews Stats De'Ron Davis = Top 50 (3pts) De'Ron Davis Stats Leron Black = Top 50 (3pts) Leron Black Stats And there are plenty more
  10. Big 10 Talent

    Every school deals with the same things. School 1 loses a high rated player, because there was another high rated player that fit school 1's system better. School 2 picks up school 1's departed player, because they feel that school 1's system did not work as well as School 2's system will. The moral of the story here is no my list is not an exact science, but it paints a pretty good picture of where our teams talent is at.
  11. Big 10 Talent

    This is 100% correct
  12. Big 10 Talent

    Somebody understands what the initial post was hinting at!
  13. Big 10 Talent

    Let me repost this again "I didn't look up any of the Nebraska players, because I already knew their rankings before I made this list. I looked up every other team, because I did not know what they had. So making Allen Top 100 was not intentional and was not done to give us an edge. If I do something like this again I will make sure to see if our recruits ranking dropped after they signed." So to make the argument that I have a flawed methodology is false. I do not question any of the other 13 teams I listed (The 9 seasons you were hinting at). Even if I did miss a player, or botched their rating by a point or two it does not take away the purpose of the initial post! Like ConkintheCorner said you guys are nit picking just to be difficult.
  14. Big 10 Talent

    I didn't look up any of the Nebraska players, because I already knew their rankings before I made this list. I looked up every other team, because I did not know what they had. So making Allen Top 100 was not intentional and was not done to give us an edge. If I do something like this again I will make sure to see if our recruits ranking dropped after they signed.
×