hskr4life

Members
  • Content count

    3,715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by hskr4life

  1. 1. Mason-- Minn 2. McIntosh-- NW 3. Sanders-- Rutgers (He just needs some pieces around him) 4. Watson-- Neb 5. Mathias-- Pur I might add that I could honestly see any of the top 4 shuffled around.
  2. Since we all love polls at this time!
  3. 1st at MSG, 1st B1G Tournament, 1st Husker Conference Championship in said B1G Tournament?
  4. Every single player mentioned with 10 or more votes. I could see any one of these guys being a surprise guy.
  5. As will I! The point I was trying to make was that that'd be a lineup that I would have been ok with in the past, but what's impressive is what we would have on the bench had we been using that lineup.
  6. I left the Freshman off of this for a few reasons. One of which is that these are 4 players who I have seen mentioned at some point or another as either... A: Getting mop up minutes B: Not being good enough or C: Not being talented enough. I don't think any of the Freshman fall into those catergories at the present. MAYBE Nana.
  7. Options Options Options! I love it!! This is a lineup that I'd be ok with!! But to me, what's even more impressive... Taylor, Palmer, McVeigh, Gill, Copeland, and Okeke is our bench. When is the last time we've had this much depth? We can seriously play around with a lot of different lineups this time!
  8. If we started everyone who thinks they "Should be starting," we would have 10+ starters each game. Now I am liking our odds in the W/L column there, but that is not possible. We see these guys 20-30 times... maybe a little more... a YEAR. Coaches see them 20-30 times... probably more... a MONTH. Who starts isn't just based on * or Games.
  9. To be fair... we didn't have much option with BP. Love that guy, but if he were in Tai's situation as a freshman, I don't think he starts.
  10. Gosh man... now that is tough! Probably one of my favorite things about seeing that is that in years past, looking at those lineups, you would probably have thread titles like "If everyone had stayed..." or, "Team A from this year VS Team B from that year. Who ya got?" But no! These guys are all on one team. Wowza. I can't decide. Would it be a push!?!? I just don't know. I flipped a coin and had to go with white. TAILS NEVER FAILS!
  11. I'd take 50k to hang out with the Husker Basketball Team every year!
  12. I remember what some said about Tai Webster. How he was not ever going to be anything more than a role player. Yada Yada. Coming out of high school, would anyone have confidently said Patton was a first round pick? Guys change, guys improve, work ethics can go up and they can go down. I would say Okeke has a little more athleticism than Jordy does as the moment. If Okeke goes all in, he can get better and he will. If that means he is better than Jordy, then great! I will think nothing less of Jordy or his development if Okeke is a bit better than he is at the moment. I guess I just do not get the camp that says if Okeke is playing more than Jordy, it means that Jordy is no good. Though I tend to look at the positive side of things and be a little more optmistic when it comes to thinking about the future.
  13. 2/3 is better than 1/3 or 0/3. Honestly, I think that this ended up pretty good for us. Obviously it would have been nice to have all three back, but it'd also be nice to win a million bucks and I'm just happy coming home even from a casino.
  14. Should have added isn't worth it for power conference programs. There has always been kids who went to littler conferences. I should add that I believe it's worth it and the talent level in the state isn't as bad as some think.
  15. I would disagree with this because I compare Allen more to Watson than others who have transferred... if that is what you are referring to. I do not think Allen will see diminishing playing time as his career moves forward, and I also do not see him being played at a position where he wants something different or new. Now, knowing recent history, he will probably have a pretty short leash this year. Hopefully he can look past that if it does happen, because the kid has a bright future. That is the only way I could see him leaving, and I would hope he looks no further than Glynn if he was even thinking about it.
  16. There is a perception among some that Nebraska High School Basketball isn't worth recruiting. I think we are seeing this start to change, but it'll take a little bit of time I think.
  17. I can certainly see this. If you are picking the best "team," then there are only so many shots that can go around for one. I think I would still go with Terran, but I can certainly see your side as well. This actually made me second guess my picks for just a second.
  18. This year, or even next. We should** have two full years of a pretty solid team coming up!
  19. I said Copeland, but only if he is eligible this full year. If he is not, I would probably go with Allen for both. I agree with Jason, this would have been a starting 5 that we would have been giddy about some years. Remember the "smallest lineup in college basketball?" That team played hard though. Funny thing is, one of these players could redshirt, and we are missing 2-3 starters that aren't even listed. Man oh man do I love the talent upgrade. Now... can the wins follow? For the first time in a while, we *SHOULD* have two full years of a pretty solid lineup.
  20. My thoughts... Guards- Tai, Terran, and Glynn. With this group, you have play makers, drivers, and a little bit of shooting as well. I felt that this was a pretty good tag team of three. You also had some really good defenders, so two way players with this group. Also considered- Walker (Omitted because I thought the other 3 provided more), and White (Omitted because of defense... and I just have a general dislike for the guy, but mainly for defensive purposes). Posts- Shavon, Jordy, Brandon. I feel like this was the best three overall posts. Jordy was borderline, but he is really the first "true" post that we have had. He would be a good 6th man for this team of 6. I also took Shavon for his playmaking ability. Brandon I feel would have flourished with some other pieces around him, and therefore I took a shot with him. Also considered- Ed (Omitted because I think the other 3 proved just a little more and a little something different), Pitchford (Would have loved another big who could shoot, but he was just too streaky to provide consistent playmaking)
  21. OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD
  22. Is it just me, or does it look like Tim Miles has aged far beyond the years he's been here. Might be just me...
  23. We'll be hurting... certainly not better off... but I think we can still compete.
  24. My God... Roby could be a beast. He looks like one!
  25. I think many think he could earn a scholarship is one is left open. However, I do not think he was given one.