Jump to content

Postseason Tourney Talk


Recommended Posts

Conference standings after Saturday's games:

 

1. Missouri Valley: 4-1 (80%)

2. Big Ten: 9-3 (75%)

3. WCC: 2-1 (67%)

4. Big 12: 12-7 (63%)

5. Big East: 8-5 (62%)

6. ACC: 12-9 (57%)

7. SEC: 8-8 (50%)

8. Mountain West: 2-2 (50%)

9. America East: 1-1 (50%)

10. Big South: 1-1 (50%)

10. C-USA: 1-1 (50%)

10. MAC: 1-1 (50%)

10: SWAC: 1-1 (50%)

14: Atlantic 10: 2-3 (40%)

14. AAC: 2-3 (40%)

16. Atlantic Sun: 0-1 (0%)

16. Big Sky: 0-1 (0%)

16. Big West: 0-1 (0%)

16. Colonial: 0-1 (0%)

16. Horizon: 0-1 (0%)

16. Ivy: 0-1 (0%)

16. MAAC: 0-1 (0%)

16. MEAC: 0-1 (0%)

16. Northeast: 0-1 (0%)

16. Ohio Valley: 0-1 (0%)

16. Patriot: 0-1 (0%)

16. Southern: 0-1 (0%)

16. Southland: 0-1 (0%)

16. Summit: 0-1 (0%)

16. Sun Belt: 0-1 (0%)

16. WAC: 0-1 (0%)

32. Pac-12: 0-3 (0%)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 4 seeds from each conference:

 

1. Big Ten: 9-3 (75%) -- Michigan State, Purdue, Ohio State, Michigan

2. Big East: 7-3 (70%) -- Xavier, Villanova, Seton Hall, Creighton

3. Big 12: 9-4 (69%) -- Kansas, Texas Tech, West Virginia, TCU

4. ACC: 6-4 (60%) -- Virginia, Duke, Clemson, North Carolina

5. SEC: 5-4 (56%) -- Auburn, Tennessee, Florida, Kentucky

6. Pac-12: 0-3 (0%) -- Arizona, UCLA, Arizona State

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conference games involving Power 6 teams:

 

1. Big Ten: 9-3 (75%)

2. Big 12: 12-7 (63%)

3. Big East: 8-5 (62%)

4. ACC: 12-9 (57%)

5. SEC: 8-8 (50%)

6. Pac-12: 0-3 (0%)

 

Power 6 vs. Power 6 games only:


1. Big 12: 7-4 (64%)

2. Big Ten: 3-2 (60%)

3. Big East: 6-5 (55%)

4. ACC: 7-7 (50%)

5. SEC: 3-7 (30%)

6. Pac-12: 0-1 (0%)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OmahaHusker said:

Screw Michigan. They made it to the championship, but now I'm done with the rooting for the conference. It's post season, has no bearing on our season, and I'm personally tired of Wagner and this little run they're on. Go Cats

 

I was going to say that you should be rooting for Michigan so that Nebraska can get a cut of the revenue payout to the Big Ten conference if Michigan wins. But digging into it some more, it turns out that the payouts stop after the Final Four. So if that's who you're rooting for/against, have at it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AuroranHusker said:

 

This will be like Rockets vs Golden State. Both teams could launch 40 threes.

 

I definitely see Villanova similar to Golden State in their offensive ability and depth. I see Michigan as more of a Spurs emphasis of defensive prowess, which is likely the only way they win this game (assuming they also don't shoot as poorly as they did against Loyola).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HuskerFever said:

 

I definitely see Villanova similar to Golden State in their offensive ability and depth. I see Michigan as more of a Spurs emphasis of defensive prowess, which is likely the only way they win this game (assuming they also don't shoot as poorly as they did against Loyola).

 

I was going with the defensive wizards as 'Golden State' i.e. Michigan while the 'Rockets' are the Wildcats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...